Mystery Files (2010–…): Season 1, Episode 11 - The Man in the Iron Mask - full transcript

In 18th century France,

King Louis XIV, scared
his twin brother

will steal his crown,
sentenceshim to a terrible fate.

Louis clamps his brothershead
into an iron mask.

He could never take it offunder
threat of being murdered.

But historians
haveargued ever since if this ever

really happened.

And for over 300 years,
theprisoner's real identity

has been in doubt.

In a quest whichleads
to the darkest dungeons

of Imperial France,
and exploresmodern medical knowledge,



and ancient documents
to search for the truth,

we open the mystery filesfrom
the man in the iron mask.

The man in the iron mask

is a phantom figure, who
exists in the shadows

of French history.

From the tantalizingevidence
that still exists,

historians think two peoplehold
the key to the story.

By investigating thecareers
of these two men,

experts now believe theycan
piece together the man

in the iron mask's life.

One is his guard,
professional jailer Benigne

d'Auvergne de Saint-Mars.

The other is one of
France'smost celebrated authors.

He goes by the single
name, Voltaire,



and is the first person
toput the story into print.

Roger Pearson is an
historian and an expert

on classic French literature.

Voltaire, from an early age, is

a critic of the
establishment, and he

loves being anti-establishment.

And his voice is always that
ofthe anti-establishment figure.

He has his own
political agenda and he

pursued it throughout his life.

His mission, ultimately,

is to have the power ofthe
Bourbon dynasty curbed,

and France regulated
by a constitution.

At the age of 23,
Voltaire'shatred of the political system

intensifies when he
becomes a victim of it.

In 17th and 18th century France,

the infamous instrument
ofoppression was the Lettre de

Cache, signed by the
kingand then counter-signed

by somebody in authority.

This letter was sufficientto
allow you to go and get

the police to arrest somebody.

The Lettre de Cache was first

enforced in the 13th century.

400 years later, Louis
XIV, the king of France,

exploits the policy
to his full advantage,

inflicting punishments rangingfrom
short, sharp shocks

to life sentences for thosewho
fall out of his favor.

Julian Swann is a historian

specializing in the
French judicial system

of the 17th and 18th century.

In France, under Louis XIV,
there was a very effective

functioning system of justice.

But, like even in moremodern
political systems,

there's still theopportunity for the state

to act in its self-defense.

Individuals could be locked
away without any chance

of a fair trial.

Or, indeed, of even being
ableto be sure why they had been

locked away.

Voltaire's
crimeagainst the establishment

is writing poems satirizingthe
regent Philippe II.

The regent clearly thoughtthat
he had gone too far,

and a Lettre de
Cache was issued,

and Voltaire was put
inprison, put in the Bastille.

That was his major experience,
at firsthand, of injustice.

King LouisXIV's
capacity for cruelty

would no doubt be
in Voltaire's mind

as his Bastille prison
door slammed shut.

Just over 40 years earlier,

a high profile scandal
had rocked France,

provoking a wave of arrests.

The Affair of the Poisonsis
one of the great causes

celebres of the 17th century.

Initially it started off withthe
trial, a spectacular trial,

of Madame de Brinvilliers,
a marquise, a woman

of high social background.

In a powerstruggle,
she and her lover

poisoned not only her
disapproving father,

but her two brothers.

Widespread hysteria
broke out, as more

members of the ruling class
areimplicated in poisoning plots.

There is even an
allegedconspiracy to poison Louis,

himself.

A witch hunt rooted
out anyone suspected

of these fiendish activities.

For many people it
wouldresult in imprisonment,

and even death.

In the course of
theinvestigations into the affair,

more than 100 people
were arrested.

Perhaps at least 30 executed.

Eventually, the treatmentof the prisoners

generates unfavorable
scrutiny of France

from other European powers,
so the inquisition is halted.

Once the investigations intothe
Affair of the Poisons end,

the government finds itselfin
a very difficult position.

It had at least
65 individuals who

knew a great deal about
what had happened,

and they were just
toodangerous to be allowed out.

The king banishedthem
to different fortresses

around his kingdom.

The Marquis de Louvois
was Louis XIV's

Secretary of State for War.

He instructs that
the prisoners must be

stripped of their identities.

Not even the prison guards
areallowed to know their names.

They were chained
to walls in dungeons

and left to rot.

Some of whom would still bealive
more than 40 years later.

Fortunately, for Voltaire,

he is spared this extreme fate.

He is only incarcerated inthe
Bastille for under a year,

yet it is enough to have
a serious effect on him.

He was in for 11 months,
and it changed him.

It really did.

Especially as he feels he, too,

is now the victim of injustice.

While of course he
had been in a sense

in the wrong to complainabout
the regent in print, um,

he was nevertheless voicingwhat
many people actually

thought about the regent.

He was not doing
things that were

different from other
people, and yet he

had been singled out
in this way and had

been given no opportunityto make his case.

From this
pointVoltaire is even more intent

on sabotaging the system.

And just over 30 years
later, he immortalizes

the story which will become oneof
France's greatest mysteries.

In 1751, Voltaire publishesa
history of Louis' reign

entitled "The age of Louis XIV."

It contains the
first reference ever

printed of a masked prisoner.

"This prisoner wore
a mask, the chin piece

of which had steel springs
toallow him to eat with it on,

and the order was to
killhim if he took it off."

Voltaire's
book details the ordeal.

He describes how
the convict's head

is sealed in iron
for 40 years, as he

is moved from prison to prison.

"An unknown
prisoner was conveyed

with the utmost secrecy."

Voltaire
writes that the offender

is escorted by an
officer entrusted

to keep his identity a secret.

Benigne d'Auvergne
de Saint-Mars.

He is the other
character historians

believe could help solve
themystery of the iron mask.

Saint-Mars was a
respected prison

officer in 17th century France.

His career guarding
high security prisoners

and transporting them from
jailto jail is well-documented.

Historian Robin
Briggs is an expert

in 17th-century Frenchhistory,
and is investigating

the man in the iron
mask and the jailer

assigned to watch over him.

Saint-Mars begins
as a musketeer,

and in 1664 the real
D'Artagnanrecommends him as the jailer

of a disgraced
finance minister who

is being sent to thisremote
fortress of Pignerol,

in the Alps.

Today the
town is on Italian soil,

and known as Pinerolo.

It bears no mark of thebuilding
Saint-Mars governed.

But in the 17th
century, Pignerol prison

is one of the most austere
andremote in the French system.

Pignerol is a fortress townin
the foothills of the Alps.

There, you have a
castle which has

several towers in its walls.

And a couple of thosetowers
had been fixed up,

so they providedaccommodation
for prisoners.

There still exists, in a series

of correspondence
betweenSaint-Mars and his boss,

the Marquis de Louvois.

Louvois is in charge
of the fortresses,

and ultimately responsiblefor
the career of Saint-Mars,

who he regards as
one of his trustees.

Their contactlasts
from Saint-Mars' time

at Pignerol until of
Louvois' death in 1691,

a key period when
prisoners are being held

in a series of different jails.

After Pignerol, around
from 1681 to 1687,

Saint-Mars is governor
of another mountain

prison, Exiles.

The journey from Pignerol
toExiles is only about 25 miles.

It would have been
quite a rough journey

through these mountains.

The fortress at Exiles dominates

the surrounding countryside.

Now, it is a museum.

But its presence today
isas daunting as back then.

This is a fairlydesolate part of the world.

Saint-Mars himself
didn't know whether he

would ever get another
promotionor be moved from there.

While for the prisoners,
itmust have seemed that this was

the place where
they would be locked

up for the rest of their lives.

A very depressing
prospect, I would have

thought, for all these parties.

More importantly,
a letter Louvois

writes to Saint-Mars on the2nd
of March 1682, corroborates

the cruel policy of
keeping the unfortunate

prisoners completely nameless.

The government likes
tooperate a policy of terror,

I think, by keepingeverything
as dark as it can.

"Since it is importantthat
the prisoners at Exiles,

who at Pignerol were called'the
prisoners of the lower

tower, ' have no
contact with anyone,

the king has ordered me
tocommand you to have them

guarded with such care
andstrictness that you can answer

to his majesty for them
beingunable to speak with anyone,

not only from outside,
but even amongst

the garrison of Exiles."

Historians have discovered

that whilst at Exiles,
Saint-Mars only

has two prisoners
with him, both of whom

he had bought from Pignerol.

We know that one of
theprisoners dies at Exiles,

and the other one is
taken to the Ile St.

Marguerite by Saint-Mars.

And therefore, this
must be the surviving

prisoner from Pigerol.

The island
of St. Marguerite

lies in the Mediterraneansea with a view

of the modern city of Cannes.

The Fort Royal,
where theprisoner is incarcerated,

overshadows the small island.

The garrison is now
a tourist attraction,

and the waters surroundingit
welcome a steady stream

of holidaymakers.

Visitors can
still see the cell where

he spends 11 solitary years.

This is not the end of
themysterious prisoner's torment.

His final destination is
theinfamous Bastille in Paris.

Voltaire confirms that
the masked prisoner

is transported by Saint-Mars.

He is ultimately promotedto
be governor of the Bastille

in 1698, which is when
theman in the mask makes his

appearance in the Bastille,
because Saint-Mars brings him

from the Ile St. Marguerite.

Yet in all the
lettersbetween the jailer, Saint-Mars,

and his superior, Louvois,
thereis not one mention of a mask.

At first, this seems to be
atodds with Voltaire's story.

But further investigationreveals a source

from the records
of the Bastille,

that endorses his account.

The storming of the
Bastille in 1789

brought about its
utter destruction.

Today all that remains ofthe
fortress that once loomed

threateningly over
Paris are a few stones

that were recovered oncethe
French Revolution had

died down.

The building itself
may have disappeared,

but some of its
records have survived.

TheBibliotheque de L'Arsenal

is part of the National
Library in Paris.

It holds many of the
documents that chronicle

the Bastille's murkypast,
including the diary

of one of its officers.

Well, Etienne de Junca is
alieutenant of the Bastille, who

was expected to guard andto
look over the prisoners

during their incarceration.

He is present
whenSaint-Mars arrives from St.

Marguerite with the prisoner.

De Junca keeps a
journal of everything

that happens in the
Bastilleduring his time there.

It's a daily record that allows

him to keep track of events.

Who's in the prison, why theyare
there, and when they leave.

In its pages
is the first eyewitness

reference to Saint-Mars'
prisoner being masked.

"On Thursday, September 18,at
3 o'clock in the afternoon,

the new governor
of the Bastille,

Monsieur de Saint-Mars,
made his official

entry into this prison.

He comes from the islandsof St. Marguerite,

And St. Honorat and hasbrought
with him in a letter

an old prisoner who he had
in custody in Pignerol,

and whom he kept alwaysmasked,
and whose name has not

been given to me, or recorded."

Here,
we have thefirst irrefutable evidence

that this namelessconvict is indeed masked,

and has been with Saint-Mars
throughout the majority

of his career as
a prison official.

This is the fate that intriguedand
terrified readers when

first published by Voltaire.

But using modern medicalknowledge
to test the story

throws up surprising results.

Musculoskeletal
surgeon, Mike Edwards,

reveals the likely
effects of being

cooped up decade afterdecade
in a solid iron mask.

Based on the story that a mancan
be encased in an iron mask

for 30 years, never
removing it, how likely

is it that he would survive?

In my opinion and on the
balance of probability

he wouldn't survive.

With the aid
of computer graphics,

Mike unravels what
wouldactually take place inside.

To understand what'shappening
beneath the mask,

it's best at this stage we
takethe mask away from the face.

Beneath the mask
there's an environment

that is warm, moist, and fatty.

Horrible for the
person in the mask,

but nirvana for bugs
suchas fungus and bacteria.

If the skin is damaged,
it opensa portal to the bloodstream.

Bacteria on the
outside are no problem.

Bacteria on the inside
are a big problem.

And the skin would break easily

when it rubs against the mask.

Once the bacteria get
into the bloodstream,

they multiply and precipitatea
very dangerous situation

known as a septicemia.

The bacteriatrigger
a chain reaction.

One by one the
organs in the body

begin to shut down as thebrain
steals blood from them.

The first place this
goes is in the skin.

The second is in the kidneys,
in the liver, the lungs,

and eventually the heart.

But when the heart goes,
that's the end of the line.

Julian Swann hascome
to the Chateau of Loches,

in the Loire Valley in
France to investigate

the conditions 17th
centuryprisoners were subjected to.

This is one of the
greatprisons of state in France

and it had initially beenused
by the French kings going

right back into medieval times.

But it was still
very much typical

of a French state prisonat
the time of Louis XIV.

Torture is common practice.

There were a number
of torture devices

that were used regularly aspart
of the judicial procedure.

One of the most infamous

is today euphemistically
called "water boarding."

The arms are tied togetherand
pulled up over the head.

Both feet are then drawn tightand
fastened to a solid object,

usually a wall.

And then they would be stretched

so they were at an
angle such as that,

with boards placed
underneath them.

What would happen
then, is they'd

have a linen mask
put over their face,

and they would take
a cow's horn which

would be put it in the mouth.

And then the
unfortunate individual

would have water poured
intothem, as much as 16 liters.

They would
haveexperienced excruciating pain,

and suffered the
agonizingsensation of drowning.

[GASPING

Grim reminders ofhow
unfortunate prisoners are

restrained are still evident.

In Loches, ordinary prisonerswere
chained to the walls.

Chains like this were
put around their neck.

And can you imagine how
difficult it would be?

They'd find it almostimpossible
to get comfortable

or even to lie down.

And for years on
end, they might find

themselves in this situation.

Yet, whilst evidenceof
these terrible treatments

are still visible,
there isnone of anyone being tormented

with a mask made of iron.

Yet, both de Junca,
thelieutenant at the Bastille,

and Voltaire,
claim thatit was a real punishment.

In November, 1703,
de Junca again

recalls the masked prisoner,
when he describes his death.

"On Monday the 19th
of November, 1703,

the unknown prisoner
whomMonsieur de Saint-Mars had

brought with him from theislands of St.
Marguerite,

and had kept for a long
time, died at about

10 o'clock in the evening."

However,
an exacttranslation of the text

reveals that the
prisoner is in fact--

"--always masked with
a black, velvet mask."

The clinical investigation

shows how it would bevirtually
impossible to survive

in a mask made of metal,
soperhaps there never was one.

Even though this is not
theonly incident of prisoners

whose faces are hidden.

What we have with this storyof
the man in the iron mask is,

I think, is a set of
dramatic improvisations

and additions to a
rathersimple original story.

Which is that of somebody,
who having become

a criminal of state,
for obscure reasons

which we can only guess at,
isthen trapped in this system.

In theirobsession
for utter secrecy,

the authorities would
mask prisoners in public

to ensure identities are
kept completely hidden.

Maybe Saint-Mars' convict
isjust another victim condemned

and subsequently
lost in the system,

like so many other
unfortunatesouls during this period

in French history.

We have other people in masks.

It's all part of a generalsystem
in which once you become

a state prisoner
you can just vanish,

and there's no reason whyanybody
should know who you are

or where you are once
you're being held in it.

Whilst to have been disguised,

he is probably
someone of high rank,

his sentence appears
not to be unique.

The quest to understand
how a common practice,

unremarkable at the time,
becomes this exceptional tale

of terror, leads
back to the author

who first wrote aboutit,
Voltaire, the man who

wants to end Louis' tyranny.

Voltaire continues
toinfuriate the authorities

with his risky writing,
makingit increasingly dangerous

for him to remain in France.

So he very cleverly moved
justacross the border from Geneva

into what is, in fact, France.

And he buys this very
large, ruined kind

of semi-fortress, really,
and completely rebuilds it.

And that is then his
Chateau de Ferney.

So he's found, geographically,
the ideal position.

It's in France,
so he's notbothered by the Genevans,

but it's close enough to
Geneva that if he were

to hear of any police peoplecoming
from Paris to get him,

he could simply slip across
theborder into Geneva and be safe.

Voltaire lives in his hideaway

until the year he dies.

Safe from capture heresumes
his subversive work.

And once it found that, then he

could, in fact,
start saying things

that he wanted to say before.

And it is whilsthe
is out of harm's way

that he further
embellishes his story.

In a work entitled
"Questionson the Encyclopedia,"

Voltaire implies that
the man in the iron mask

is none other than
Louis' brother.

The accusation is
designed to bring

King Louis and his Bourbondynasty
into more disrepute.

Yet, experts question the
truthbehind Voltaire's plot line.

The idea that the man in
themask is Louis XIV's brother

seems impossible,
because a royal birth

is such a public event
in 17th century France.

The queen is surrounded
by dozens of people,

and even after the
birth there would still

be a substantial number
of people around her.

And therefore, the
secret couldn't possibly

have been kept had there
been a second birth.

So this coreelement
of Voltaire's story

appears to be fabricated.

He simply makes up these
scandalous allegations.

It is just another part
of his greater plan.

He may precisely be usingthis
story for his own ends,

and the ends clearly would
beto undermine the legitimacy

of the Bourbon monarchy.

A deliberate
attempt to perpetuate

the myth of the man
in the iron mask,

and draw attention to
KingLouis' sadistic behavior.

The masked prisoneris
a powerful symbol of how

brutal the system can be,
andone which Voltaire no doubt

realizes will undermine
the king and capture

the imagination of his readers.

In February, 1778,
Voltairecomes home to Paris

after nearly 25 years and
istreated as a returning hero.

Historians claim that
Voltaire'santagonistic propaganda

provokes public animositytowards
their despotic leaders.

And although he doesn't
live to witness it,

he helps trigger theFrench
Revolution of 1789.

I think in a way Voltaireis
the person who begins

to tear the Bastille down.

That's to say, that the Bastilleis
a symbol of this oppression,

which of course,
was eventually torn

down in the revolution itself.

The unjust and oppressive

Bourbon monarchs are deposedand
replaced by the republic.

And the uprising
ends the tyranny

of the Lettres desCaches, which are finally

abolished once and for all.