Forensic Files (1996–…): Season 13, Episode 10 - Window Watcher - full transcript

>> Narrator: UP NEXT, THE

PEEPING TOM GOES ONE STEP

FURTHER AND COMMITS AN

UNSPEAKABLE CRIME.

>> THE SCENARIO HERE,

THANKFULLY, IS NOT A SCENARIO WE

SEE VERY OFTEN.

>> THIS WAS SOMEONE THAT WAS AN

AVID WINDOW PEEPER AND BEEN

THERE BEFORE.

>> Narrator: FOR 20 YEARS, HE



ELUDES POLICE AND EVEN RETURNS

TO THE CRIME SCENE.

>> IN THE KITCHEN IS THE BRA.

THE GUY HAD MADE HIS WAY BACK TO

THE SCENE TO RELIVE IT.

>> Narrator: EVENTUALLY, HE GOES

ONE STEP TOO FAR.

>> IT'S ONE OF THOSE "AHA!"

MOMENTS THAT YOU GET.

>> WE ASSUMED IT'D BE A

14-YEAR-OLD KID.

>> Narrator: ON A STIFLING-HOT

NIGHT IN OKLAHOMA, GARY ELWOOD

WENT TO BED EARLY.



HIS GIRLFRIEND, JANET HAYNES,

STAYED UP FOR A WHILE AND WENT

TO BED LATER.

JUST AFTER MIDNIGHT, THEY HEARD

A NOISE COMING FROM THE LIVING

ROOM.

GARY WENT TO INVESTIGATE.

>> SHE HEARD HIM SCREAM FOR

HELP.

SHE HEARD NOISES.

SHE HEARD SOUNDS OF A STRUGGLE.

THIS, OF COURSE, BROUGHT HER TO

FULLY AWAKE ALMOST

INSTANTANEOUSLY.

>> Narrator: JANET RAN TO HELP,

BUT WITHOUT HER GLASSES COULDN'T

SEE CLEARLY.

>> SHE WAS ABLE TO TELL US THAT

HE WAS WEARING GLOVES AND HAD

UNDERWEAR ON.

>> Narrator: THE ASSAILANT

CHASED JANET BACK INTO THE

BEDROOM, WHERE SHE WAS

ASSAULTED.

>> HE WOULD TRY, OVER THE COURSE

OF THAT ATTACK, TO KNOCK HER

UNCONSCIOUS, TO SUFFOCATE HER TO

A POINT WHERE SHE WOULD LOSE

CONSCIOUSNESS.

>> SHE'D BLINK AND SAY, "YOU

DON'T HAVE TO KILL ME."

HE SAYS, "YES, I DO."

AND I THINK PRETTY MUCH SHE

MANAGED TO JUST TALK HIM OUT OF

THAT POSSIBILITY.

>> Narrator: AFTER SEVERAL

HOURS, THE ATTACKER LEFT.

THAT'S WHEN JANET DISCOVERED

GARY'S LIFELESS BODY.

NOW IN A STATE OF SHOCK, SHE

MANAGED TO CALL POLICE.

>> PLEASE HURRY!

>> SHE WAS ASKING ME, "IS HE

DEAD?

IS HE DEAD?

I KNOW HE'S DEAD.

HE'S DEAD."

>> Narrator: GARY ELWOOD HAD

BEEN STABBED TO DEATH.

POLICE FOUND HIS BODY NEAR THE

FRONT DOOR.

HE WAS ONLY 27 YEARS OLD.

>> GARY WAS EVIDENTLY SURPRISED

IN THE DINING AREA OF THE HOUSE,

WHICH WAS IN THE FRONT.

I NOTICED A CRACK IN THE

SHEETROCK ON THE WALL THAT WAS

OBVIOUSLY DONE BY THE FORCE OF

BEING DRIVEN INTO THE WALL.

IT WAS ALMOST AN OUTLINE OF HIS

BODY, WHERE HE CRASHED INTO THE

WALL.

>> Narrator: GARY WAS DIVORCED,

A SUCCESSFUL BUSINESSMAN WITH NO

KNOWN ENEMIES.

>> HE WAS A FIRST-CLASS GUY --

SMART, INTELLIGENT, KNEW EXACTLY

WHERE HE WAS GOING AND THE

THINGS THAT WERE IMPORTANT IN

LIFE.

CARED A LOT ABOUT PEOPLE.

>> Narrator: GARY AND JANET HAD

BEEN DATING FOR ONLY A SHORT

TIME, SO SHE DIDN'T KNOW WHETHER

GARY KNEW HIS KILLER.

>> HER EYESIGHT HAD SOME

LIMITATIONS, AND THE DARKNESS OF

THE ROOM CONTRIBUTED A GREAT

DEAL TO THAT, EVEN THOUGH SHE'D

SPENT A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF

TIME WITH HIM IN THE ROOM.

>> Narrator: SHE SAID THE

ATTACKER WAS IN HIS EARLY 20s,

HAD BLOND HAIR, WAS JUST UNDER

6 FEET TALL, AND HAD A SCRAGGLY

BEARD.

POLICE ACROSS OKLAHOMA WERE

LOOKING FOR A MAN WHO FIT THIS

DESCRIPTION.

BUT SOME MEMBERS OF THE POLICE

DEPARTMENT BEGAN TO QUESTION

JANET'S STORY.

>> WE ALWAYS QUESTIONED TO HOW A

GUY THAT MAYBE CARRYING HIS

CLOTHES AND STRIPPED DOWN TO HIS

UNDERWEAR, CARRYING A KNIFE AND

BLOOD ALL OVER HIM, WHERE'S HE

GONNA GO AND HOW'S HE GONNA GET

AWAY WITHOUT SOMEBODY NOTICING

IT?

>> ...FIRST ON THE SCENE TO A

GRUESOME MURDER.

>> I FOUND OUT THAT GARY HAD

BEEN MURDERED AS WE WERE

WATCHING THE EVENING NEWS.

THEY WOULD ASK ME, "IS THERE ANY

POSSIBILITY THAT GARY WAS

INVOLVED WITH DRUGS?"

AND THE ANSWER IS ABSOLUTELY NO.

>> Narrator: GARY ELWOOD WAS

BRUTALLY MURDERED BY SOMEONE WHO

BROKE INTO HIS HOME IN THE

MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT.

BUT THE MOTIVE DIDN'T APPEAR TO

BE ROBBERY.

NOTHING OF VALUE WAS MISSING,

AND THE VICTIM'S GIRLFRIEND,

JANET HAYNES, SURVIVED THE

ATTACK.

>> WHAT I FOUND FASCINATING

ABOUT THAT WAS THE FACT HE

DID NOT RESORT TO PHYSICAL

VIOLENCE TOWARD THE VICTIM.

HE WAS SIMPLY TRYING TO SUBDUE

HER.

HE DIDN'T BEAT HER.

HE DIDN'T USE PROFANITY TOWARD

HER.

HE DIDN'T ATTEMPT TO STAB HER,

EVEN THOUGH HE COULD HAVE VERY

EASILY DONE THAT.

>> Narrator: INVESTIGATORS

STARTED TO QUESTION WHETHER

JANET HAYNES MIGHT HAVE KNOWN

THE PERPETRATOR, OR PERHAPS THE

PERPETRATOR KNEW HER.

>> WE THOUGHT IT WAS POSSIBLE

THAT IT COULD HAVE BEEN AN

EX-BOYFRIEND OR AT LEAST SOMEONE

WHO HAD EITHER TRIED TO DATE HER

OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.

IT'S ALMOST LIKE HE'S TRYING TO

REMOVE THE OBJECT BETWEEN HIM

AND THE GIRL.

>> Narrator: YET ANOTHER UNUSUAL

DETAIL WAS JANET'S DESCRIPTION

OF THE KILLER.

SHE SAID HE WAS WEARING ONLY HIS

UNDERWEAR AND A PAIR OF GLOVES.

>> IT JUST DIDN'T RING RIGHT TO

ANY OF US.

WE REALLY WANTED TO JUST VERIFY

THAT SHE WAS BEING UP-AND-UP

WITH US.

>> Narrator: SO JANET WAS GIVEN

TWO EXTENSIVE POLYGRAPH

EXAMINATIONS, AND SHE PASSED

BOTH TIMES.

POLICE LOOK FOR EVIDENCE TO

CORROBORATE JANET'S STORY.

AT THE TIME, LUMINOL WAS JUST

BECOMING AVAILABLE.

SO INVESTIGATORS DECIDED TO TRY

IT.

>> THEIR REACTION WAS "WHOO,"

'CAUSE THEY WERE AMAZED AT WHAT

IT WAS REVEALING AT THAT TIME.

AND FROM THAT SCENE, IT GOT THE

NICKNAME LOCALLY HERE OF "WHOO

JUICE" BECAUSE IT WAS SUCH A

WEIRD FEELING TO BE WATCHING

WHAT'S GOING ON, AND WE REALIZED

WHAT GREAT POTENTIAL THIS

LUMINOL HAS.

>> Narrator: THE LUMINOL WAS

FURTHER PROOF THAT EVERYTHING

JANET TOLD INVESTIGATORS WAS

TRUE.

>> ALL OF THE SUDDEN, YOU START

SEEING FOOTPRINTS APPEARING IN

THE DARK.

THAT'S ALMOST LIKE YOU'RE

WALKING IN THE FOOTSTEPS OF THE

PERSON.

AND THE HAIR STANDS UP ON THE

BACK OF YOUR NECK BECAUSE AT

THAT MOMENT, YOU'RE SEEING THE

ACTUAL DIRECTION THAT THIS

ASSAILANT HAD WALKED.

>> Narrator: AND INVESTIGATORS

FOUND OTHER EVIDENCE TO

CORROBORATE JANET'S STORY.

THE SCREEN IN THE DINING-ROOM

WINDOW HAD BEEN CUT, THE LIKELY

POINT OF ENTRY.

UNDER THE MASTER-BEDROOM WINDOW,

IN THE SOFT DIRT, WERE SOME BARE

FOOTPRINTS FROM AN INDIVIDUAL

WITH A SIZE-11 FOOT.

AND INVESTIGATORS DISCOVERED A

FAINT FABRIC IMPRESSION IN THE

DIRT UNDERNEATH THE WINDOW.

>> IT'S PRETTY GOOD DETECTIVE

WORK, I THINK, IF YOU COULD TELL

THAT THEY SEE A BUTTOCKS IMPRINT

ON THE GROUND BENEATH THE

WINDOW.

IT LOOKED AS THOUGH THAT PERSON

HAD SPENT QUITE A LOT OF TIME

UNDER THAT WINDOW.

>> Narrator: FROM THAT WINDOW,

THE KILLER HAD A CLEAR SIGHT

LINE INTO THE BATHROOM.

JANET TOLD INVESTIGATORS SHE

TOOK A SHOWER BEFORE SHE WENT TO

BED.

TO INVESTIGATORS, THIS TOLD A

STORY.

>> PERPETRATOR IN THIS

PARTICULAR CASE WAS A WINDOW

PEEPER.

WINDOW PEEPERS LOOK FOR VICTIMS

OF OPPORTUNITY, AND ONCE HE

DISCOVERED THAT THERE WAS, IN

FACT, A WOMAN INSIDE THAT

RESIDENCE, THAT'S WHERE HE

DECIDED TO COMMIT HIS CRIME THAT

PARTICULAR NIGHT.

>> Narrator: BECAUSE THE KILLER

ENTERED THE HOUSE WEARING ONLY

HIS UNDERWEAR AND A PAIR OF

GLOVES, FBI PROFILERS BELIEVED

HIS TARGET WAS JANET, NOT GARY.

AND HE MUST HAVE BELIEVED SHE

WAS ALONE.

>> IT WAS OUR OPINION THAT THE

TARGET IN THIS CRIME, THE

PRIMARY TARGET IN THIS CRIME,

WAS JANET.

HE WANTED TO RAPE HER.

THAT'S THE REASON, THE PRIMARY

MOTIVE FOR ENTERING THAT

RESIDENCE TO BEGIN WITH.

>> Narrator: HAZELWOOD BELIEVES

THE PERPETRATOR HAD NEVER KILLED

BEFORE.

>> IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE, WE

FELT IT WAS PANIC STABBING.

HE HAD NOT EXPECTED TO ENCOUNTER

GARY AT THAT PARTICULAR POINT.

>> Narrator: THE FBI CREATED AN

ENTIRE PROFILE OF THE PERSON

THEY BELIEVE PERPETRATED THIS

CRIME.

>> WE ESTIMATED HIS AGE TO BE

BETWEEN, I BELIEVE, 22 AND 27.

HIS EDUCATION -- WE SAID HE HAD

GRADUATED FROM HIGH SCHOOL.

HE LIVED WITHIN WALKING DISTANCE

OF WHERE THE CRIME HAD BEEN

COMMITTED.

>> Narrator: HAZELWOOD PREDICTED

THAT THE KILLER WOULD BE SO

TRAUMATIZED THAT HIS WEIGHT

WOULD FLUCTUATE, AND HE WOULD

LOOK FOR A LEGITIMATE REASON TO

LEAVE THE AREA.

>> THIS WAS A FRIGHTENING

EXPERIENCE FOR THIS PERSON

BECAUSE IN OUR OPINION HE HAD

NEVER KILLED BEFORE, AND HE DID

NOT INTEND TO KILL WHEN HE WENT

INTO THAT RESIDENCE.

>> Narrator: BUT IF THE KILLER

HAD LEFT TOWN, HOW WOULD POLICE

FIND HIM?

>> Narrator: POLICE BELIEVED

THAT GARY ELWOOD'S KILLER WAS

SOMEONE WHO LIVED NEAR THE CRIME

SCENE, WAS A WINDOW PEEPER IN

HIS EARLY TO MID-20s, AND WOULD

LEAVE THE AREA AFTER THE CRIME.

INSIDE THE CRIME SCENE,

INVESTIGATORS FOUND SOME FOOT

IMPRESSIONS IN BLOOD.

ONE HAD PLENTY OF RIDGE DETAIL.

>> YOUR FEET AND YOUR HANDS HAVE

UNIQUE FINGERPRINTS.

THE DERMAL PATTERNS ON YOUR FEET

ARE UNIQUE TO YOU, JUST AS YOUR

FINGERPRINTS ARE UNIQUE TO YOU

ON YOUR HANDS.

>> Narrator: ALL POLICE NEEDED

NOW WAS A SUSPECT.

>> I WENT FROM DOOR TO DOOR.

"HAVE YOU LIVED HERE?

HOW LONG HAVE YOU LIVED HERE?

WHO DO YOU KNOW IN THE

NEIGHBORHOOD?

WHO DO YOU ASSOCIATE WITH IN THE

NEIGHBORHOOD?"

>> Narrator: THEY FOUND ONE

PROMISING LEAD -- 18-YEAR-OLD

BILL WINTERS, WHO LIVED TWO

BLOCKS AWAY FROM THE CRIME

SCENE.

>> HIS PARENTS HAD MOVED OUT OF

STATE AND LEFT HIM ALONE IN THAT

HOUSE.

HE WASN'T A BIG GUY.

HE WOULD HAVE BEEN JUST THE

RIGHT SIZE TO GET THROUGH THE

HOLE IN THE SCREEN.

>> Narrator: AS THE PROFILE

PREDICTED, SHORTLY AFTER THE

MURDER, WINTERS LEFT TOWN TO

LIVE WITH HIS PARENTS IN

MISSOURI.

DURING POLICE QUESTIONING,

WINTERS DENIED ANY INVOLVEMENT

IN GARY ELWOOD'S MURDER AND

WILLINGLY PROVIDED A PRINT OF

HIS RIGHT FOOT.

IT DID NOT MATCH THE BLOODY

PRINT FOUND IN THE VICTIM'S

HOME.

>> I WAS EXTREMELY FRUSTRATED.

NOT ONLY IS ALL THE WEIGHT ON

YOUR SHOULDERS BECAUSE THIS IS

YOUR UNSOLVED CASE, BUT IT ALSO

WEIGHS ON THE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

TOO.

IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT YOU

CAN'T AFFORD TO LET GO OF.

>> Narrator: THREE YEARS PASSED.

THEN, AN INMATE AT THE LOCAL

JAIL CONTACTED POLICE ABOUT HIS

FORMER ROOMMATE, BOB JOHNSON.

>> SOMEONE WHO CAME FORWARD AND

CLAIMED THAT THEIR ROOMMATE AT

THAT TIME, IN '86, JOHNSON, HAD

COME HOME BLOODIED AND SAID THAT

HE HAD KILLED SOMEBODY.

>> Narrator: JOHNSON'S MUG SHOT

LOOKED REMARKABLY LIKE THE

COMPOSITE DRAWING OF THE

SUSPECT.

HE DIDN'T FIT THE FBI PROFILE,

BUT HIS BACKGROUND MADE HIM A

LIKELY SUSPECT.

>> HIS EX-WIFE TOLD THE

INVESTIGATORS THAT MR. JOHNSON

HAD A SIGNIFICANT DRUG PROBLEM,

AND HE WAS CONDUCTING THOSE

BURGLARIES TO HELP SUPPORT THAT

HABIT.

>> Narrator: JANET HAYNES

IDENTIFIED JOHNSON IN A PHOTO

LINEUP.

>> SHE PUT THE FINGER ON

JOHNSON.

SO I'M SURE AT THAT POINT EDMOND

INVESTIGATORS CLEARLY THOUGHT

THEY HAD THEIR MAN.

>> Narrator: BY THIS TIME, DNA

TESTING WAS STANDARD PRACTICE.

SO JOHNSON'S DNA WAS COMPARED TO

SEMEN FROM JANET HAYNES'

RAPE-TEST KIT.

AND HIS FOOTPRINTS WERE COMPARED

TO THE BLOODY FOOTPRINTS AT THE

CRIME SCENE.

>> IT WAS JUST A MATTER OF DAYS

THAT WE GOT THOSE RESULTS BACK

AND CONCLUSIVELY EXCLUDED HIM AS

A SUSPECT OF THIS HOMICIDE.

IT WAS NOT HIS FOOTPRINT.

IT WAS NOT HIS DNA TYPE THAT WAS

LEFT BEHIND.

>> Narrator: THE CASE WENT COLD

AGAIN.

INVESTIGATORS NEVER GAVE UP, BUT

THEY WERE RUNNING OUT OF IDEAS.

THREE YEARS LATER, ON A HUNCH,

THEY REVISITED THE SCENE OF THE

CRIME, NOT EVEN SURE WHAT THEY

WERE LOOKING FOR.

>> WE GO BACK INTO THE HOUSE,

AND WE'RE JUST LOOKING AROUND,

BECAUSE IT SAT THERE FOR SEVERAL

YEARS VACANT.

>> Narrator: WAS THERE ANYTHING

THEY MISSED?

SOMETHING THEY HADN'T THOUGH OF?

AND THEN THEY FOUND A POTENTIAL

CLUE.

>> RIGHT ON THE FLOOR IN THE

KITCHEN AREA IS THE BRA.

>> Narrator: IT DIDN'T LOOK NEW,

BUT IT WASN'T THERE THE LAST

TIME THEY WERE INSIDE THE HOME,

SHORTLY AFTER THE MURDER.

WAS IT POSSIBLE THAT THIS

BELONGED TO JANET HAYNES?

>> I VERIFIED THE BRA BELONGED

TO HER.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT IS

CHARACTERISTIC OF A LOT OF

RAPISTS IS THAT THEY WILL TAKE A

TROPHY.

AND ONE OF THE TROPHIES THAT WE

FELT THAT HE TOOK, IN TIME, WAS

THE FEMALE'S BRA.

SO I BELIEVE THAT THE GUY HAD

MADE HIS WAY BACK TO THE SCENE

TO RELIVE IT.

>> Narrator: BUT IF THE KILLER

HAD BEEN BACK IN THE

NEIGHBORHOOD, IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN

ONLY FOR A VISIT.

>> THIS GUY HAS SOME DIRECT TIES

TO THAT NEIGHBORHOOD SOMEHOW,

SOME WAY -- EITHER RELATIVES IN

THE NEIGHBORHOOD, OR HE HAD

LIVED THERE.

>> Narrator: OVER THE NEXT

18 YEARS, POLICE CHECK DOZENS

OF SUSPECTS FROM SEVEN DIFFERENT

STATES.

NONE PANNED OUT.

THEN, IN THE SPRING OF 2004, TV

VIEWERS IN EDMOND, OKLAHOMA, SAW

THIS STORY.

>> SCOTT EGGLESTON SAYS HE KNEW

SOMEONE HAD BEEN WATCHING HIS

FAMILY FOR MONTHS, EVEN TAKING

PHOTOS THROUGH A CRACK IN THE

BLINDS.

>> WE ASSUMED IT'D BE A

14-YEAR-OLD KID.

>> Narrator: BUT IT WASN'T A

KID.

IT WAS A GROWN MAN.

>> THE FATHER CAME AROUND THE

HOUSE AND FOUND A SUSPECT

DRESSED COMPLETELY IN BLACK.

HE HAD ARRANGED AN OUTFIT THAT

WAS LIKE A TURTLENECK, WHERE HE

COULD PULL IT UP OVER HIS FACE,

AND HE HAD JUST CUT OUT HOLES

FOR HIS EYES AND A HOLE FOR HIS

MOUTH SO HE COULD BREATHE.

>> Narrator: AND THE MAN WAS

BAREFOOT.

>> I GOT A LITTLE ADRENALINE

RUSH, AND I SAID, "WHERE ARE

WE?"

I CAME STRAIGHT BACK TO THE

STATION, PULLED OUT A MAP, AND

REALIZED THAT I WAS DIRECTLY

STRAIGHT ACROSS WHERE GARY HAD

BEEN KILLED ALMOST 18 YEARS AGO.

>> Narrator: WAS THIS THE MAN

WHO KILLED GARY ELWOOD AND

SEXUALLY ASSAULTED JANET HAYNES

ALMOST 20 YEARS EARLIER?

>> HE PULLED UP HIS TURTLENECK

TO COVER HIS FACE.

JUST STARTED WALKING...

>> Narrator: WHEN POLICE

ARRESTED 40-YEAR-OLD

JONATHAN GRAHAM FOR PEEPING INTO

THE WINDOW OF A TEENAGE GIRL,

THEY SUSPECTED HE WAS MORE THAN

JUST A VOYEUR.

IN HIS POSSESSION WERE ITEMS

FOR A MORE VIOLENT CRIME.

>> A BAG WAS FOUND WITH SEVERAL

DIFFERENT KINDS OF KNIVES, THREE

PAIR OF HANDCUFFS, FLEX CUFFS,

CONDOMS, SEX LUBRICANTS, SEX

TOYS, LOCK-PICKING TOOL,

BANDANNA, BLACK CLOTHING, WHICH,

IN OUR BUSINESS, THAT'S A RAPE

KIT.

>> Narrator: POLICE NOW

SUSPECTED GRAHAM WAS RESPONSIBLE

FOR THE MURDER OF GARY ELWOOD

AND THE SEXUAL ASSAULT OF

JANET HAYNES, CRIMES THAT

OCCURRED 18 YEARS EARLIER IN THE

VERY SAME NEIGHBORHOOD.

AT THE TIME OF GARY ELWOOD'S

MURDER, GRAHAM WAS LIVING WITH

HIS PARENTS JUST A COUPLE OF

BLOCKS FROM ELWOOD'S HOME, AND

THAT'S WHERE HE WAS LIVING NOW,

AFTER A BRIEF STINT IN THE ARMY.

WITH A WARRANT, POLICE SEARCHED

GRAHAM'S HOME.

ON HIS COMPUTER, THEY FOUND

CHILD PORNOGRAPHY AND PICTURES

OF WOMEN HE'D SECRETLY

PHOTOGRAPHED.

INVESTIGATORS TOOK AN INKED

PRINT OF GRAHAM'S FEET.

>> I REMEMBER I WAS JUST SITTING

THERE, THINKING ABOUT THAT, JUST

"YEAH, I HOPE THIS ONE WORKS

OUT."

>> Narrator: ANALYST JIM STOKES

SEARCHED FOR CORRESPONDING RIDGE

DETAIL ON THE CRIME-SCENE

FOOTPRINT AND THE ONE TAKEN FROM

JONATHAN GRAHAM.

>> I WAS ABLE TO ISOLATE AN AREA

ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE FOOT, THAT

BEING IT WAS A RIGHT-FOOT

IMPRESSION.

SO IT WOULD BE THE RIGHT SIDE OF

THE FOOT ABOUT MIDWAY DOWN.

>> Narrator: STOKES CALLED

INVESTIGATORS WITH THE NEWS.

>> I WAS REALLY QUITE

SURPRISED -- AND EXCITED.

>> YEAH, THAT WAS A PRETTY COOL

DAY.

>> THERE WAS A LOT OF CHEERING

ON THE PHONE, SO...

I STILL REMEMBER THE SCREAM IN

MY EAR.

>> Narrator: FINALLY, GRAHAM'S

DNA PROFILE MATCHED THE

BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE FROM

JANET HAYNES' RAPE-TEST KIT.

>> IT WAS LIKE THE WEIGHT OF THE

WORLD BEING LIFTED OFF YOUR

SHOULDERS.

IT WAS JUST -- YOU CAN'T

DESCRIBE IT.

>> Narrator: THE FBI PROFILE HAD

BEEN REMARKABLY ACCURATE IN

PREDICTING THE PERPETRATOR'S

AGE, EDUCATION, AND WHERE HE

LIVED.

GRAHAM ALSO ADMITTED HE LOST

WEIGHT AFTER THE MURDER AND

JOINED THE ARMY, WHERE HE WORKED

IN MILITARY INTELLIGENCE.

AFTER HE WAS DISCHARGED, HE

RETURNED TO OKLAHOMA.

>> I GUESS THAT WAS HIS BEST

SITUATION, TO MOVE BACK INTO AN

AREA THAT HE WAS FAMILIAR WITH,

THE SAME, OLD NEIGHBORHOOD THAT

HE ONCE LIVED IN A DECADE-PLUS

AGO.

>> Narrator: BUT WHY WOULD

GRAHAM RETURN TO THE SAME

NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE HE KILLED

GARY ELWOOD DECADES EARLIER AND

COMMIT THE SAME CRIME OF WINDOW

PEEPING, KNOWING THAT IF HE GOT

CAUGHT, HE'D IMMEDIATELY BE A

SUSPECT IN ELWOOD'S MURDER?

>> AND THE ANSWER IS SIMPLY THAT

HE WAS A WINDOW PEEPER, AND HE

WAS DRIVEN TO COMMIT THOSE TYPES

OF CRIMES.

THAT'S WHAT WAS EXCITING TO HIM.

AND I BELIEVE THAT HE FELT HE

WOULD NOT BE CAUGHT.

WHY?

BECAUSE HE WAS SO PROFICIENT AT

WHAT HE HAD BEEN DOING OVER ALL

THOSE YEARS.

>> Narrator: PROSECUTORS BELIEVE

THAT GRAHAM STOOD OUTSIDE

GARY ELWOOD'S HOME ON THE NIGHT

OF THE CRIME AND WATCHED WHILE

JANET HAYNES TOOK A SHOWER.

GRAHAM THOUGHT JANET WAS THERE

ALONE, SINCE HE COULDN'T SEE

GARY FROM HIS VANTAGE POINT.

AFTER JANET WENT TO BED,

PROSECUTORS THINK GRAHAM REMOVED

HIS CLOTHES AND SHOES OUTSIDE,

THEN ENTERED THE HOUSE BY

CUTTING THE WINDOW SCREEN.

HE MADE ENOUGH NOISE THAT HE

WOKE GARY, WHO WENT TO

INVESTIGATE.

THE TWO FOUGHT.

THEN, GRAHAM STABBED GARY TO

DEATH AND FOR THE NEXT FEW HOURS

TERRORIZED JANET.

GRAHAM LEFT CLEAR FOOTPRINTS IN

GARY'S BLOOD, WHICH LATER TIED

HIM TO THE SCENE, ALONG WITH THE

DNA EVIDENCE.

FACING A POSSIBLE DEATH

SENTENCE, JONATHAN GRAHAM PLED

GUILTY TO FIRST-DEGREE MURDER

AND RAPE.

Play one of the best new FPS shooters,
search Steam for PROJECT WARLOCK

GRAHAM HAD NO WAY OF KNOWING

THAT 20 YEARS LATER, TECHNOLOGY

WOULD EVENTUALLY CATCH UP WITH

HIM.

>> THE FORENSIC SCIENCE BEHIND

THIS INVESTIGATION IS WHAT

SEALED JONATHAN GRAHAM'S GUILT,

EVEN WITHOUT EVER STEPPING A

FOOT IN COURT.

>> OVER MY CAREER, I'VE SEEN

SOME AMAZING THINGS, AND THAT,

COUPLED WITH GOOD DETECTIVE

WORK, THERE'S JUST NO END TO

WHAT WE CAN DO.

>> WE HERE IN SCIENCE, IN

FORENSICS, WE'RE HERE FOR THE

TRUTH.

WE'RE NOT HERE FOR THE

PROSECUTION.

WE'RE NOT HERE FOR THE DEFENSE.

WE'RE HERE FOR THE TRUTH.

>> HE WILL SPEND THE REST OF HIS

LIFE IN THE STATE PENITENTIARY.