Ukraine on Fire (2016) - full transcript
Ukraine. Across its eastern border is Russia and to its west-Europe. For centuries, it has been at the center of a tug-of-war between powers seeking to control its rich lands and access to the Black Sea. 2014's Maidan Massacre triggered a bloody uprising that ousted president Viktor Yanukovych and painted Russia as the perpetrator by Western media. But was it? "Ukraine on Fire" by Igor Lopatonok provides a historical perspective for the deep divisions in the region which lead to the 2004 Orange Revolution, 2014 uprisings, and the violent overthrow of democratically elected Yanukovych. Covered by Western media as a people's revolution, it was in fact a coup d'état scripted and staged by nationalist groups and the U.S. State Department. Investigative journalist Robert Parry reveals how U.S.-funded political NGOs and media companies have emerged since the 80s replacing the CIA in promoting America's geopolitical agenda abroad.
the Maidan, Independence Square,
has turned into a full-scale war zone.
More clashes
in Ukraine's capital Kiev.
There is absolutely no doubt
that snipers are working here.
I counted 10 bodies.
Now on
the brink of civil war,
at least 70 dead so far,
and the death toll rising.
- What we saw here today was a revolution.
- We have invested over $5
billion to assist Ukraine
in these and other goals.
- NATO has expanded into 13 countries
up to the borders of Russia, 13 countries.
- The focus has to be
not allowing this crisis
to turn into a hot war
between Ukraine and Russia.
Ukraine, it's
an ancient and proud land
with a rich history,
filled with much beauty,
heroism and sacrifice.
Ukraine is a border land,
a place where east meets west.
This is the flag of Ukraine.
The blue represents the sky.
The gold, its seeming
endless fields of wheat.
Ukraine is a prize many have sought
and much blood was spilled
in the quest to possess it.
Ukraine has been the path
for the western powers
as they attempted to conquer the east
in World War I and World War II,
and every time, the Ukrainian people
ended up paying the highest price
for these grand games of power.
"History doesn't repeat
but it surely rhymes,"
said Mark Twain.
If one looks closely at
the history of Ukraine,
one will notice many rhymes.
Being surrounded by stronger powers,
Ukraine has needed a lot
of cunning to survive,
and the art they truly mastered with time
is the art of changing sides
In the middle of the 17th century,
Ukrainian leader Bogdan Khmelnitskiy
broke a truce agreement made with Poland,
siding with more powerful Russia.
Just over 50 years later,
as the Russian-Swedish war was raging
another Ukrainian leader Ivan Mazepa
broke the Union with Russia
when he switched sides,
joining forces with the Swedish invaders.
Many times Ukrainian history
was written by third parties.
Seeking to keep the gains
of a revolution at any cost,
Russia agreed to the
humiliating conditions
of the Brest-Litovsk treaty of 1918,
which turned Ukraine into
a German protectorate.
Another historical document
that changed the fate of Ukraine
was the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact of 1939,
one of many such agreements being signed
between European countries
and rising Germany.
Attempting to protect his nation
from the approaching Nazi threat,
Joseph Stalin negotiated a treaty
of non-aggression with Adolf Hitler.
While promising each other peace,
the Soviet and German foreign ministers,
Molotov and Ribbentrop, realigned
the map of eastern Europe,
splitting it into German and
Soviet spheres of influence.
No sooner had the
Molotov-Ribbentrop pact been signed,
then Poland was split.
And in September of 1939,
eastern Poland awoke to be
western Ukraine and a part
of the family of the Soviet
republics and the USSR.
But even this bold dividing
of land and nations only
delayed the inevitable.
Germany broke its promise to the USSR.
On June 22nd 1941,
Germany invaded the USSR,
launching Barbarossa, the
largest military operation
in world history.
Barbarossa was aiming
for Saint-Petersburg,
Moscow and Kiev, Ukraine,
three destinations of major significance.
Ukraine, with its rich
lands and resources,
was an important industrial
and economic source
for the USSR.
To cut it off from the Soviet Union
would strike a big blow indeed.
For most of the Soviet Union,
the Second World War was
about fighting the invaders of their land,
but it wasn't quite so simple for Ukraine.
The truth is Ukraine has
never been a united country.
When World War II broke out,
a large part of western
Ukraine's population
welcomed the German soldiers as liberators
from the recently forced
upon them Soviet rule
and openly collaborated with the Germans.
The real scale of
collaboration was not announced
for many decades after the war,
but we now know that whole divisions
and battalions were formed
by Ukrainian collaborators,
such as SS Galizien, Nachtigal
and Roland battallions.
Just in the beginning of the war,
more than 80,000 people
from Galicino region
voluntarily enrolled
into division SS Galizien
in a month and a half.
Notorious for their
extreme cruelty towards
the Polish, Jewish and Russian people
on the territory of Ukraine.
Members of these military
groups came mostly
from the Organization of
Ukrainian Nationalists, the OUN.
Founded in 1929, this
organization had an ultimate goal
of creating an ethnically
pure, independent Ukraine
and considered terror an acceptable tool
for achieving their ends.
Their official flag was black
and red, land and blood.
It will remain in Ukraine's
history long after the OUN
will cease to exist.
In early 1940, the most
radical nationalistic part
of the organization of
Ukrainian nationalists
got its own leader, Stepan Bandera.
Severely anti-Semitic and anti-communist,
he proclaimed an
independent Ukraine in 1941.
His German allies frowned
upon such an act of self-will
and it landed him in prison
for nearly all of the Second World War.
Not participating in
the events physically,
Bandera still managed to
successfully spread his ideology.
Many independent historians estimate
that the OUN militia exterminated
from 150,000 to 200,000 Jews
on the Ukrainian territory
occupied by the Germans
by the end of 1941.
(somber instrumental music)
The most notorious and outrageous massacre
took place September 29th and
30th, 1941 in Babi Yar, Kiev.
All kikes of the city of Kiev
and its vicinity must appear
on Monday, September 29th by
eight o'clock in the morning.
Bring documents, money and valuables,
and also warm clothing, linen, et cetera.
Any kikes who do not follow this order
and are found elsewhere will be shot.
33,771 Jews were killed
in this two day operation
of the Nazis and Ukrainian militia.
Another outrageous
massacre was carried out
by the Ukrainian insurgent
army and the Bandera faction
of the Organization of
Ukrainian Nationalists
in German occupied Polish
Wolyn and eastern Galicia
in 1943 and 1944.
This genocide of Poles
was led by Mykola Lebed.
35,000 to 60,000 in Wolyn
and 25,000 to 40,000
in eastern Galicia fell victim
to this massive ethnic
cleansing operation.
Sensing the inevitable
loss of the German troops,
the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists
gave up on their former ally
and began fighting equally
against Germans and Soviet forces.
In January 1943, USSR troops
started pushing the Nazis back,
liberating one part of
Ukraine after another.
Western Ukraine was the
last Ukrainian region held
by the Germans, finally being
liberated in October of 1944.
Bandera's bands continued
to wage their guerrilla war
against the Soviet regime,
carrying out bloody raids
on Ukrainian villages and towns
and leaving behind chaos and casualties.
This war went on till
the middle of the 1950s
when the last collaborators
were either detained
or fled the country.
On May 7th, 1945, Germany
unconditionally surrendered
to the Allies.
Ukraine remained a part
of the Soviet Union.
The peace after the Second
World War was short-lived.
The United States and the Soviet Union,
nations who allied together,
along with England to defeat the Nazis,
tragically became foes
as the Cold War began.
The era of political and military tension
between the US and the USSR
lasted for nearly 45 years,
keeping humanity under the
constant threat of nuclear war.
In this battle, the United
States never lost sight
of Ukraine's importance.
US intelligence kept a close eye
on Ukrainian nationalist organizations
as a possible source
of counter-intelligence
against the Soviet Union.
CIA documents that just
recently have been declassified
show strong ties between US intelligence
and Ukrainian nationalists since 1946.
From the CIA agency report,
it is clear that they were not mistaken
about the nature of Ukrainian
nationalist organizations
or their leader, Stepan Bandera himself.
According to an OSS
report of September 1945,
Bandera had earned a fierce reputation
for conducting a reign of
terror during World War II.
After the Second World War,
Bandera and other Ukrainian Nazi leaders
fled to Europe where the
CIA helped them hide.
The CIA later informed
the Immigration and Naturalization Service
that it had concealed Stepan Bandera
and other Ukrainians from Soviets.
The operations involving
Ukrainians continued
for many years.
The Nuremberg trials of 1945 and 1946
brought the political,
economic and military leaders
of fascist Germany to justice
and revealed to the world
the monstrous face of Nazism
and the crimes they committed.
But the Ukrainian Nazis
were spared the same fate
and some were even granted
indulgences by the CIA.
By 1954, the agency excused
the illegal activities
of the OUN's security branch
in the name of Cold War necessity.
In 1949, Mykola Lebed, the man responsible
for the massacres in Wolyn was
moved to the United States,
where he died in 1989 without
ever being investigated
or pursued as a war criminal.
The CIA moved to protect
Ukrainian nationalist leader,
Mykola Lebed, from criminal investigation
by Immigration and
Naturalization Service in 1952.
Perhaps Bandera lost his use to the US
or maybe KGB agents outsmarted the CIA,
but in 1959, Stepan Bandera,
the leader of the Ukrainian nationalists,
was killed in Munich,
where he was hiding under
the name of Stefan Popel.
It would be fair to say that
Bandera became a major symbol
of Ukrainian nationalism by sheer chance
for he wasn't neither its only
nor its most powerful one.
Dmytro dontsov was the father
of the far right totalitarian
doctrine in Ukraine.
Andriy Melnyk the leader of
another fraction of the OUN.
Roman Shukhevych was the general
of the Ukrainian insurgent army,
and others contributed
greatly to the movement.
Bandera's dangerous ideology,
suppressed by the communist authorities
but supported by external
forces, never really died.
The seeds of Ukrainian
nationalism were passed
from generation to generation.
Unfortunately, it was
just a matter of time
before they would once again blossom.
In 1954, Ukraine's territory
was expanded even more
when Nikita Khrushchev,
the leader of the USSR
and an Ukrainian himself
generously gave the
Crimean region to Ukraine.
Historians would argue about
the legitimacy of this transfer
for many years to come.
And 60 years after Khrushchev's gift,
dramatic new events would
take place in Crimea
- The eyes of the world are on Ukraine
as the crisis in Crimea continues.
Dozens of heavily armed men
seized government buildings in Crimea.
- Should Ukraine just shrug its shoulders
and say, okay, Crimea is lost?
And the old arguments
would heat up once again.
The Cold War would heat
up and cool down by turns
while both rivals
were obsessively building
up military capacity.
The turning point took place
when the new era, Perestroika
came to the USSR with its new
leader, Mikhail Gorbachev,
in the middle of the 1980s.
Perestroika meant restructuring
towards liberalization
and democratization.
It certainly had a positive impact
on the international situation.
- Astonishing news from East Germany,
where the East German authorities
have said, in essence,
that the Berlin wall doesn't
mean anything anymore
But inside
the USSR, the weakening
of Kremlin control had
different consequences.
In Ukraine, a nationalistic
political organization,
Narodniy Rukh, or People's Movement
emerged in 1989 due to this new openness.
They advocated
for independence of Ukraine
from the USSR and became an incubator
for leaders of Ukrainian neo-Nazism.
In 1991, one of them, Oleh
Tyahnybok, founded Svoboda,
an openly radical nationalistic party
preaching the good old
principles of Bandera.
Purge Ukraine
from Jews and Russians,
Ukraine for Ukrainians, and so on.
His statements got him the fifth place
in the Simon Wiesenthal Center
Top 10 Anti-Semitic World
Leader rankings of 2012.
But also, sadly,
attracted numerous followers.
Dmitri Yarosh founded another
extreme right organization
Trizub or Trident in 1994.
In April 2013, Yarosh became an assistant
to a member of parliament
from the opposition party Udar
Later that same year,
he would become the leader
of the most radical Ukrainian
Nazi group, the Right Sector.
Andriy Parubiy would soon
appearing leading a whole army
of ultra-nationalist warriors
and the torch marches would once again
light up the streets of Ukrainian cities.
The world drastically
changed in August 1991
when the USSR de-facto ceased to exist.
The global political map
welcomed many newcomers,
Ukraine one of them.
In modern history,
it was the first time
Ukraine was truly independent
and all on its own.
- The red flag came down
over the Kremlin tonight
as president Gorbachev resigned
and brought to an end seven decades
of communist rule in the Soviet Union.
The years after
the disintegration of the USSR
became known as crazy '90s
in all the post-Soviet territories.
- He's leaving behind
15 independent states
which share only a disastrous economy
and an uncertain future.
After having been
under a government-controlled economy,
the free market dramatically
changed the rules of the game.
New businesses emerged instantly
and the first oligarchs
were born overnight.
The former country with no class division
suddenly became stratified,
the chosen few became rich
while the rest had to fight to survive
The people's
growing discontent
made Ukraine more
vulnerable to outside forces
and a new kind of warfare was launched,
one not known before,
the color revolutions.
Demonstrators
clash with police,
hundreds of thousands protesting
the results of the election
and calling for a new vote.
Ukraine has
had two color revolutions
in its 24 years of its independence.
In 2004, crowds of people
descended upon Kiev,
marking the start of
the Orange Revolution.
At that time, Ukraine became
once again a battlefield
of two forces, the Russian
and western governments.
The culmination of this
conflict took place
during the presidential
elections in November of 2004.
The two major candidates,
Western-backed Viktor Yushchenko
and Russian-leaning Viktor Yanukovich
almost equally shared
the votes of Ukrainians.
By the way, calling Viktor
Yushchenko western-backed
is not an exaggeration.
His wife, Kateryna Yushchenko,
is a former US state department official
and worked in the white house
during the Reagan administration.
The division was along geographic lines.
Traditionally Russian eastern Ukraine
voted for Yanukovich,
while western Ukraine chosen Yushchenko.
By the announced results,
Viktor Yushchenko lost
to Viktor Yanukovich
but thousands of people
didn't agree with it
and they came to the
central square of Kiev
on the 22nd of November.
The situation received wide news coverage.
The country's
election commission
ignored reports of fraud,
declaring Kremlin-backed
Viktor Yanukovich the winner.
International politicians
such as former General Secretary
of NATO, Javier Solana,
became frequent guests in Kiev,
initiating negotiations
between the parties.
The results of
the negotiations, however,
were often reached only on paper.
Thus, Yushchenko never told his supporters
to stop blocking the government
buildings in central Kiev.
Therefore these non-violent
and very orange protests
lasted for a month, during which time
the previous election
results were annulled,
marred by massive corruption,
and new elections were announced
An important nuance, just 3 months before,
Viktor Yushchenko became a victim
to a mysterious and
still unsolved poisoning
but it didn't prevent him from
winning in the new election.
Though as we shall soon see,
there was much more than
just the people's will
that led to this victory.
This peaceful revolution and its leader
were warmly welcomed by
the international community
but the euphoria didn't last long.
Yushchenko's government
completely failed with reforms
and lost its chance to
establish democracy,
instead descending into in-fighting.
Viktor Yushchenko was not
reelected for a second term
but at the end of his presidency,
he had time to make one last gift
to his supporters from western Ukraine
The hero status
of Stepan Bandera was short-lived.
In 2010, Viktor Yanukovich
was elected president.
This time the international
community had no doubts
about the legitimacy of the elections.
In January 2011, Viktor Yanukovich
repealed the hero title of Bandera.
Almost four years into
his presidency, though,
another revolution shook Ukraine.
Unfortunately, this one
was anything but peaceful.
(speaking in foreign language)
- Mr. Yanukovich, I am an American.
I'm an outsider to this situation
and it's very complicated
but I would like, as a filmmaker,
just to jump into the action
and go to those moments in November 2013.
You're president of the Ukraine,
you've been president for
three years at this point.
The country is in a bad
economic shape, very bad.
You have a trade agreement with Russia
and now you're seeking to
make a better agreement
with the EU, with the European Union,
and you're negotiating.
Can you bring me to that moment
and what you were thinking?
Violent clashes erupted
in the Ukrainian capital, Kiev
as more than 100,000 people protested
against government decision
to delay an association deal with the EU.
- Vitaliy, you were the
Minister of Interior Affairs
for the Ukraine during this period
and you were Chief of Police,
essentially of the country.
Can you tell me your
version of what happened
from November protests
through February protests?
Arseniy Yatsenuk,
leader of the opposition party Fatherland,
Oleh Tyahnybok, leader of
the opposition nationalist
far right radical party Svoboda,
Vitali Klitschko, leader of
the opposition party Udar.
Both EU and
Ukrainian officials said
on Thursday, the suspension
of talks on closer ties
could be revived after
the two-day meeting,
but officials said the deal
was off the table for now.
Pro-EU protests
on the streets of Kiev
enter their second day.
The crowd of around 1,000
protesters were joined
by the leader of the opposition,
the reigning world boxing
champion, Vitali Klitschko.
He called on the demonstrators
to maintain pressure on the government
after it decided not to sign a
major trade deal with the EU.
- You go back to Kiev the next day
after the meeting with Merkel
and protests are up, am I right?
Can you take me through that period?
Robert Parry
is a longtime investigative journalist
based in Washington DC,
best known for his major disclosures
about the Iran-Contra scandal in 1980s.
He is the founder of Consortiumnews,
where he has reported extensively
on the crisis in Ukraine
and the forces behind the unrest.
- An NGO is a
non-governmental organization.
Now many NGOs are quite legitimate.
They represent good causes,
maybe they help people
in a country feed or
deal with water problems
or deal with various
kinds of social problems.
But there are some NGOs
that have become funded
by government entities
and serve more the
purpose of that government
rather than trying to serve the people
that they are ostensibly working for.
One thing we saw in the 1980s,
at that point the Central
Intelligence Agency
had been largely discredited
because of the scandals that
had been exposed in the 1970s.
For 15 years,
the CIA had secretly financed
overseas activities of the
National Students Associations,
but then there came to
light a fantastic web
of CIA penetrations.
- So when the Reagan
administration came in,
there was this concept that
instead of having the CIA
which traditionally would go
into these different target countries
funding their media, funding NGOs,
funding different political operations,
that was essentially farmed
out to a new organization
called the National
Endowment for Democracy,
which was created in 1983.
And it would do pretty much
what the agency used to do.
It would go into one of these countries
and it would support
various political groups,
train activists, deal with
journalists, business groups
and try to advance US
foreign policy interests,
sometimes against the interests
of the host government,
the target government.
And beyond that, they received financial
and other logistical help
from the National Endowment for Democracy
and other US agencies that
helped them training activists,
working with journalists
to get their side
presented more favorably.
They work on things like
how do you get traction,
how do you get things to go viral,
how do you then use that to
generate support for your cause.
And support was generated.
Mustafa Nayem, a founder of one
of Ukraine's new media outlets
Hromadske. tv knew very well
how to make something go viral.
It was his notorious Facebook post
on November 21st, 2013
that brought the first crowds to Maidan.
"If you
don't read the newspaper,
you are uninformed.
If you read the newspaper, you
are misinformed," Mark Twain.
To deliver your message efficiently enough
in the modern world with so
many different technologies
and means of communications,
you must embrace them all.
As the disturbing events
of Euromaidan started
on November 21st, 2013,
three new TV channels went on the air
and suddenly became
stunningly popular in Ukraine.
Spilno. tv, November 21st,
Hromadske. tv, November 22nd
and Espreso. tv, November 24th.
Directly from opposition protests,
these channels went viral,
supporting the protests and
encouraging more and more people
to come to Maidan.
November 30th of 2013
became the first turning
point of Euromaidan
and one of its most reported
and mysterious events.
After riot police
attacked peaceful protesters with clubs...
It happened early in the morning hours.
Eyewitnesses that were there say
that the police did use truncheons.
Coincidentally,
Serhiy Lyovochkin
is a close associate
to many US politicians.
The security service
of Ukraine had evidence
that on that night,
Lyovochkin was in contact
with the opposition leader Yatsenyuk
where they discussed
the clearing of Maidan
on the pretext of installing
the annual Christmas tree.
News media reported
that the riot police cruelly
attacked the students
peacefully sleeping in their tents
but scenes from the event seem
to tell a different story.
It appears that the protesters
were waiting for the police.
Additionally, there were
dozens of journalists
and cameramen from all the
new public TV news outlets
prepared to covered the events.
And most ominously, group
of well trained young men
arrived to Maidan almost simultaneously
with the riot police.
They infiltrated the crowd
and began provocations
with insults, stones and torches
- The Right Sector in Ukraine
represents a part of
the Ukrainian population
that has often favored fairly
extreme right-wing positions.
They had militias
that came especially
during the Maidan protests.
There were groups that were
being shipped into Kiev
where they would provide
the muscle, in effect,
for the demonstrations.
So the demonstrations went
from being relatively
peaceful political protests
to being increasingly violent.
The first
step in any detective work
is to establish a motive.
It is now said that Serhiy Lyovochkin
is held in high esteem by
his powerful US friends.
Outraged by what was reported in the news,
the Ukrainian people came
out in force on the next day
to vent their anger
with the police actions.
- The violence started to take off when?
As veiled and masked
as the color revolutions can be,
an attentive viewer can
see a subtle patterns
and similarities revealing
their true nature.
To make crowds act as one obedient group,
they have to be united
at the unconscious level.
The masterminds of color
revolutions know this well
and have perfected the art.
Symbolism is one of
the most powerful tools
to achieve this end.
Revolutionary political organizations
with surprisingly similar names
and even more similar logos
have appeared time and again
almost as omens marking the
countries that would be hit
by the color plague next.
They are often described
as being aware and active,
when they're actually trained and radical.
They are the ones who take the first shot,
literal and metaphorical
to transform the peaceful protests
into full-blown coup d'etats.
Their fingerprints can be found everywhere
on the map of color revolutions.
Using all the experience
of past generations,
simple but effective tools
like catchy singalongs
and chanting are employed.
Well known
for exciting the crowd
and creating the group identity,
they depersonalize individuals
and make them easier to manipulate.
Incidentally,
one such organization,
Hromadske. tv, received generous donations
from the Dutch and US embassies
as well as from the
Renaissance Foundation,
an NGO founded by George Soros.
- I've set up a foundation in Ukraine
before Ukraine became
independent of Russia
and the foundation has
been functioning ever since
and it played a important
part in events now.
"I like criticism,
"but it must be my way,” Mark Twain.
- Did you see any evidence
of US involvement?
Did you feel a presence from the US?
- We will be back here, on this square,
to celebrate with you a Ukraine
that stands together with Europe
and stands with the United States.
- Well, members of congress
were visiting Ukraine
during that period.
Most famously, Congressman John McCain.
So some of the people who were
challenging their government,
their elected government at that point,
were being told by the senior US official,
a person who ran for president,
and a top official in the US Congress
that the US was with them.
- I'm senator John McCain
and it's always a pleasure
to be back in Ukraine
- Senator McCain was, in
a sense, giving the people
in the Maidan a feeling
that they had the backing
of the most powerful country on Earth.
- This is about the future
you want for your country.
This is about the future you deserve.
- Who was your highest level
contact at the US government
in this period?
- And the US Ambassador?
- In early February of 2014
as the Maidan crisis was
getting more violent,
there was a phone call
that was intercepted.
It was a call between the
Assistant Secretary of State
for European Affairs, Victoria Nuland,
and the US Ambassador to
Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt.
- Questions of credibility
are being raised
after a private chat
between two top US diplomats
was leaked online.
I think Yats is the guy
who's got the economic experience,
the governing experience.
What he needs is Klitsch
and Tyahnybok on the outside
I just think Klitsch going in,
he's going to be at that
level working for Yatsenyuk,
it's just not going to work.
Yeah, no,
I think that's right.
Okay, good, do you want us to
try to set up a call with him
as the next step?
- Sullivan's come back to me,
VFR saying you need Biden
and I said probably tomorrow
for an atta-boy and to
get the deets to stick.
So Biden's willing.
- Okay.
- So you had this remarkable phone call
where you have these two senior officials
of the US government
apparently talking about coup
or how they were planning
to restructure the government of Ukraine.
- Fuck the EU.
- No, exactly.
- I'm not saying the whole
US government feels that way.
There is division on this,
but the neoconservative
element wants very much
to change the strategic
dynamic in the eastern Europe.
The neocons are very smart people
and they've been at this for a long time.
They came in around the
issue of propaganda.
They studied how to create hot buttons
for the American people.
They had this experience
when they were getting the
American people to get excited
about Central America back in the 1980s.
- Sandinista regular
army, their ground force
is being equipped now
with Russian artillery.
- And they've been applying
those same strategies ever since.
They remain very dedicated
to achieving their goals.
They still want to get rid
of certain governments.
They want a regime change
in Syria, for instance.
Regime change in Iran.
They're very skilled at this
and they have a lot of allies
now inside the news media,
inside the government,
and that means that they can do a lot
to control the narrative of any story.
- I think in america these days
we have somehow told ourselves
that there are a lot of ways
of dealing with these problems
other than hard power.
Viadimir Putin cares about hard power.
- The neoconservatives
can now demonize a leader
of a country.
That sells with the american people.
So you don't just argue a
policy, you attack the leader.
So the neoconservatives
became very skilled
at picking out leaders,
finding their ugly traits,
and then highlighting them.
Yanukovich, you might say
was a rather clunky political leader,
but you make him into a devil.
He's totally corrupt and he's evil
and he wants to kill people in the Maidan,
these wonderful
white-hatted demonstrators.
You've got a black hat versus white hat.
And you keep repeating that basic scenario
and it works with American people.
- You got to realize
what Viadimir Putin is.
He's an old KGB colonel that wants
to restore the Russian empire
- You make them into demons
and the American people find that,
the way they can understand the world.
Once that happens, it's very
difficult for journalists
or anyone else to say,
hold it, that guy, he's
got more of a gray hat
than a white hat or a black hat.
And if you say that, you're
suddenly a Yanukovich apologist
or you're a Putin apologist
and then the attacks come
onto the person saying it,
the journalist, the academic or whoever.
Any good
director will tell you
that tempo and rhythm are
the most essential components
to hold an audience's attention.
It can also be
called a method of betrayal
when the allies and followers
are relentlessly thrown
into the revolutionary flame.
The idea is simple.
When the preparation work is done,
the trigger just needs to be pulled
to set the machine into full motion.
The murder of politician Rafik Hariri
led the Cedar Revolution.
Looking back at the mysterious poisoning
of Viktor Yushchenko
right before the Orange
Revolution of 2004,
we now see that he became
the sacred victim himself.
Most political analysts believe
that compassion of the
Ukrainian people at that moment
tilted the scales, giving
him the presidency.
The number of victims among protesters
during Euromaidan totalled over 100.
They are called the Heavenly Hundred.
All the sacred victims were
immediately mythologized.
The beating of students
on November 30th, 2013
was the obvious trigger of Euromaidan.
Those who sent trained
provocateurs to the square
very well realized that peaceful
protesters were the ones
who would get hurt the most.
It's hard to keep protests
going for months on end.
Tensions subside and people
inevitably get tired.
Holidays are also a big danger
for revolutionary masterminds.
People want to be home with
their families and friends,
and one needs to get
inventive to keep people
in a cold tent city.
On Christmas day of
2013, tabloid journalist
and political wannabe, Tetiana Chornovol
was chosen to become the tool
to whip the protests on Maidan back up.
- A civic activist and journalist
known for investigating corruption
amongst senior officials
was beaten outside Ukraine's
capital on Christmas.
Her heroic
deeds as a reported
looked more like petty crimes.
Trespassing on the presidential residence
of Viktor Yanukovich,
leading a rioting crowd
to seize the Kiev City
administration building,
breaking into a car of the
security service of Ukraine.
It looked like Tetiana was
more interested in making news
than reporting it, and
gaining name recognition
that could be turned into votes
for her struggling political career
in the opposition party Fatherland.
She gave the world media a
Christmas present in 2013
when she was cruelly beaten
by unknown assailants on the road.
Despite the fact that in just three days
all the suspects were
arrested and confessed
to beating Tetiana during
a road rage incident,
world media kept insisting
upon the political background
of that crime.
Instantaneously, Tetiana
became a heroic martyr
uniting people around her image.
- The beating, coming amid
political turmoil in Ukraine,
this has drawn a protest.
Euromaidan
was once again center stage
and Tetiana in less than two
months after the assault,
she was already healthy enough
to attack the office of Party of Regions,
the party of Viktor Yanukovich.
One of the staff members,
65-year-old IT specialist,
Viadimir Zaharov
was killed during the attack
So, where is Tetiana now?
Well, she finally got
her position of power
in the new government.
One month later the time for
another act in the play came.
Armenian Ukrainian
protester Sergei Nigoyan
was one of the first to arrive on Maidan.
He wasn't radical or violent
but instead, naive and full of hope.
Watching Sergei read a patriotic poem
is like watching a casting tape
for the role of a sacred victim.
Unfortunately,
Sergei got the part.
Betrayed by his brothers in arms,
this video would eventually go viral
after Sergei was killed
early in the morning
of January 22nd, 2014.
The circumstances of his death
remain unknown to this day
even though the whole area
of protest was heavily
filmed at that time.
There were no records or witnesses
to help the investigation
and his body was moved immediately
from the scene of the crime.
Sergei became the first
killed martyr of Euromaidan.
And in a heartbeat,
the police officers were
appointed as his killers.
Almost two years later,
the official investigation
would still deliver no results.
Now it is widely believed
Nigoyan's murder was staged
by provocateurs to escalate the conflict.
God speaks to people with
the language of signs.
On January 26, 2014, Pope
Francis prayed for Ukraine,
addressing thousands of
people at St. Peter's Square
in Vatican City.
After the prayer, two
white doves were released
from the papal window and
were immediately attacked
by a crow and seagull.
Those who understand the language
could easily read the
meaning of this omen.
Soon, great forces, the
seagull and the crow,
would be tearing apart two
Slavic nations, the white doves.
This omen gave hope to
the Ukrainian people,
saying that by God's will,
the doves would be saved
but it also predicted severe
hardship and many victims.
The events which could
enter into the history
of the color revolutions
as the most massive human sacrifice yet
arrived right on
schedule, one month later.
For weeks,
this European capital
has been the scene of a violent uprising.
Today, the bloodiest day yet.
The protesters are pushing up
towards the government district.
Armed here with Molotov cocktails,
but we saw handguns and shotguns too.
There are casualties on both sides.
- She just said that there
are six dead people up there.
Not just injured, dead.
They said they've been hit by snipers.
And here again
we meet our old acquaintance
from Narodniy Rukh, Andriy Parubiy,
who was at the peak of his glory
as a self-proclaimed commandant of Maidan,
which basically means the leader
of the radical opposition.
The protesters
were filmed leading a long line
of riot police away.
It's not clear where
they were taking them.
67 officers are currently
reported to be missing.
- 14 policemen dead and 43 wounded?
Earlier from
inside the protest camp,
the opposition leader Vitali Klitschko
urged his supporters to stay put.
Each of you here should stay
strong in spirit, he said,
because we're not going anywhere.
Like in 2004,
during the Orange Revolution,
the international leaders
felt it necessary to intervene
and bring both sides to
the negotiating table.
Laurent Fabius,
Frank-Walter Steinmeier,
Radoslaw Sikorski.
The Ukrainian
president and the leaders
of the anti-government protests there
have agreed on a truce.
The truce was to give talks
between President Yanukovich
and the opposition a chance.
Just like in 2004,
the opposition or at
least its radical faction,
the Right Sector, headed by Dmitri Yarosh
had no intention of fulfilling
his part of the bargain
- The opposition leaders left saying
they may have found a
way to end the bloodshed,
but they wanted to take the conclusions
from their meeting to the people.
It was soon apparent that
the people were not happy.
At the same time,
Kiev was saying its last goodbyes
to the victims of the massacre.
It was also welcoming those who
came to power at their cost.
Ukraine's
parliament has voted
for new speaker of the assembly
to become interim president.
Oleksandr Turchynov called on lawmakers
to form an interim government by Tuesday.
These latest developments
follow the dismissal
of President Viktor
Yanukovich on Saturday.
- And they removed Yanukovich
not following the constitutional
procedures for impeachment.
The parliament
of Ukraine consists
of 450 deputies.
The constitution of Ukraine requires
at least a 3/4 majority to vote.
In other words, 338 votes
in favor of the impeachment,
but only 328 deputies voted yes.
- The US state department
almost immediately said
this was a legitimate government
and that was a part of this
effort to get regime change.
Instead of trying to find some way
to revive the February 21st agreement
or maybe you could bring back Yanukovich
in some titular way,
that became not a possibility anymore.
Then you had eastern Ukraine resisting,
you had Crimea wanting to break away,
and things rapidly escalate.
Voters will decide Sunday
whether they'll leave
Ukraine and join Russia.
The campaign with the slogan,
together with Russia, has
the backing of Moscow.
- The Crimea situation, the referendum,
is also happening during
this period very quickly.
Crimean authorities,
sensing the mood of the populace,
fully supported Viktor
Yanukovich's decision
to postpone the 2013 European
Union association deal,
and side deeper ties to Russia.
As the events in Kiev took their course,
Crimean authorities issued a declaration,
putting into words the
fears of its people:
"based on the will of the
Crimeans who elected us,
"we declare that we will not give Crimea
"to extremists and neo-Nazis
"seeking to seize power in Ukraine
"at the cost of the blood of
the country and its citizens.”
After the regime change in Kiev,
rumors began spreading in Crimea
that the new authorities
would be merciless
to those that oppose them.
This led to the
pro-Russian demonstrations
rejecting the new government in Kiev.
On February 27th, the government buildings
in the capital of Crimea were seized
by pro-Russian protesters.
The current Crimean
government was dismissed
and the new leader, Sergey Aksionov,
was assigned as the leader
of the Crimean autonomous republic.
On March 16th,
the Crimean referendum was held
and the people voted to leave Ukraine
and enter the Russian federation.
The situation
in Crimea is being presented
as a Russian invasion,
and again, nobody who
looks at this seriously
and look at the poll numbers.
Some of the poll numbers done
by the US government agencies themselves
showing that people of Crimea
prefer being part of Russia.
In the US news media, it
has all been presented
as the Russians invaded,
they then staged a sham election.
With people with guns at their backs,
somehow they faked the ballot
boxes to get 96% approval
for rejoining Russia.
- The idea of referendum in Crimea
is just quite simply unconstitutional.
- But it does raise questions
on whether this vote
really is free and fair,
especially given the
heavy military presence
in Crimea right now, Errol.
- So that's how it's been
sold to the American people.
The reality is very different.
- The atmosphere here
is certainly electric.
Thousands of people have gathered
in the capital Crimean city of Simferopol.
All of this following a
referendum held last Sunday
in which the majority of people
here overwhelmingly voted
in support of being reunited with Russia.
Russia, Russia.
- What is described in the
west as a Russian invasion
of Crimea is in fact the presence
of Russian soldiers in Crimea.
Can you clarify that?
As long as
1804, Sevastopol's naval base
became the main military
port of the Russian empire
on the Black Sea.
During the Second World War,
the heroic defense of
Sevastopol lasted almost a year
and took hundreds of thousands of lives.
Therefore, the naval base
in Crimea has a legacy
of historical pride for the
Russian Black Sea fleet,
as well as being of huge
strategic importance.
- Those of us alive back then remember
when there were Soviet
missiles put into Cuba,
how frightened Americans
were and how angry
and how we almost went to
a nuclear confrontation
over having weapons of that
kind of destruction placed
that close to the United States.
If the United
States considers Cuba
to be in its backyard,
then Crimea lays at Russia's doorstep.
- The consequences of a
US seizure of that base,
or a NATO base?
- If we're attacked, we
would certainly respond.
- I am concerned about
the expansion of NATO.
NATO has expanded into 13 countries
up to the borders of Russia, 13 countries.
In early spring of 2014,
eastern Ukraine was also
buzzing with protests
against the new authorities in Kiev.
This region, with a
population close to Russia
geographically and culturally,
feared that the newly
formed ultra-right leanings
of the newly formed government
would bring neo-nationalism
to their lands,
and they had their reasons.
The status of the Russian
language in Ukraine
has been a stumbling block for many years.
Implementing Russian
as the second state language
was one of the main campaign promises
of President Viktor Yanukovich.
In 2012, the
Yanukovich government passed a law
making it the second official language
in the southern and
eastern parts of Ukraine,
the areas where the
Russian-speaking population
makes up a majority.
Ukrainian nationalist groups
initiated massive
protests opposing the law.
An observing viewer might see
some familiar faces there.
On February 23rd, 2014,
the very next day after the regime change,
the new government voted for an annulment
of the official status
of the Russian language,
and even though later
this decision was vetoed
by the acting president
Oleksandr Turchynov,
it still sent a message,
and a powerful one.
This alarmed the Russian-speaking
cities of eastern Ukraine
and people took to the streets
to show their disagreement.
In response, the pro-Maidan groups
conducted their own demonstrations.
When the two parties would
meet, it was always tense
and eventually it lead to tragedy.
One person died and over
50 people were wounded
in clashes during a pro-Russian march
protesting the new government in Kiev.
On April 6th, the Crimean
scenario began repeating
in eastern Ukraine,
where protesters seized
government buildings.
And the next day, April 7th,
they proclaimed Donetsk,
people's republic.
Kiev replied by announcing the beginning
of an anti-terrorist
operation in eastern Ukraine.
By that time, the international
media was screaming
about a Russian invasion in Ukraine.
- Russia could now be on the
verge of invading Ukraine.
But strong words
stayed only in the media.
The Ukrainian authorities
never announced a war-like situation.
Why?
"IMF cannot give money
to countries engaged
in ongoing war," Petro Poroshenko.
Too much money
was already invested in Ukraine
to stop half way.
We've
invested over $5 billion
to assist Ukraine in these and other goals
that will ensure a secure and prosperous
and democratic Ukraine.
Obviously, the
funds had to keep coming
and the conflict had to keep going,
getting more and more bloody and deadly.
As parties from both sides
were using more sophisticated
and lethal weapons.
The world seemed too busy
welcoming this new democracy in Kiev
to notice what was being done
as it spread its wings over the country.
Many in southern Ukraine
had been viewing the
revolution with concern
And an
anti-Maidan movement formed
in the city of Odessa
in early January 2014.
The protesters set up their camp in front
of the Trade Union house,
a building which would
soon become a monument
to a massacre of its own.
It's difficult to overestimate
the importance of Odessa.
It is strategically
located on the Black Sea
and it's Ukraine's largest seaport.
It's not surprising that
Ukraine's new authorities
were watching the
situation unfolding there
with growing alarm.
More and more of Odessa's people
were joining the anti-Maidan movement
at the same time as events
in eastern Ukraine were heating up.
The new Ukrainian government
didn't have the power
to wage war on too many fronts.
If Odessa were to join
the growing uprising
in the eastern regions,
it would seriously
complicate the situation.
This rebellion had to be
extinguished immediately
and at any cost, and that cost was high.
On May 2nd, 2014, soccer fans flocked
to the center of Odessa city
for the Ukrainian championship match.
Surprisingly, a great number of these fans
who descended into Odessa
just the night before
also turned out to be fighters
from the Maidan self-defense units,
along with members of
radical organizations
from all parts of Ukraine.
These fans, masked, armed,
and shouting nationalistic mottos
began disturbances in
the center of the city
as they marched to the
anti-Maidan tent encampments
where they attacked.
The anti-Maidan protesters sought shelter
in the Trade Union
house, but it was a trap.
Maidan supporters started
throwing Molotov cocktails
into the building until
it was engulfed in flames.
People burnt to death
inside or trying to escape,
jumped from the windows.
Although the fire station
was less than a mile away,
it took almost half an hour
for firefighters to arrive.
When they finally did,
the damage had been done.
But here is an intriguing fact.
Just a few days before
those dreadful events,
a messenger from Maidan, Andriy Parubiy,
made a visit to Odessa.
It's an interesting coincidence
that some of people he met with in Odessa
were seen at the scene that fateful day.
But not everyone was mourning.
On the popular political
talkshow Shuster Live,
the news about the people
burnt alive in Odessa
was welcomed with a
long round of applause.
On its Facebook page,
the Right Sector announced
the events of May 2nd
a proud moment of national history.
An official investigation
into this sad event
has been going on now for nearly two years
and it's yet to reach a conclusion.
But it seems the experts had
all the information they needed
from the very beginning.
It looks like Odessa
really is a very important
piece of real estate,
as it was honored with a
very special new governor,
appointed on May 30th of 2015.
Mikheil Saakhashvili, an old
friend of the United States,
and born and raised
in Ukraine's neighboring country Georgia.
- A little hoedown there in Georgia.
A quick look at his biography
gives one an understanding
that he's been groomed
for a special mission.
Mr. Saakashvili
received a US state department scholarship
and he worked for a New York law firm
which represented the organization Kmara,
a group that appeared earlier
when we learned about
the color revolutions.
- We are dealing with
democratic bloodless revolution.
This is
the Revolution of Roses
and this is Mikheil
Saakashvili with Kmara,
busy overthrowing the
legitimately elected president,
Edward Shevarnadze.
- Remove the government by peaceful means.
That's classic, really European.
I'm proud of it.
Soon after the
Rose Revolution blossomed fully,
Georgia announced its
intentions to join NATO
and plant fresh NATO military bases
in the fertile soil
right on Russia's border.
- Never ever will we give
our freedom and independence.
Never ever will we give
any piece of our territory.
Saakashvili's
mission was accomplished
at least with his friends in NATO.
The Georgian populace wasn't
quite as happy, though.
In 2007, they took to the
streets to voice discontent
and Mr. Saakashvili responded with force.
The people's discontent was grew.
Saakashvili's party lost
parliamentary elections
and the opposition took control.
He said this means
that the parliamentary majority
should set up a new government
and me as a president,
according to our constitution.
Mikheil decided not to wait
for the results of the
president's election
and fled the country in October 2013.
In 2014, Saakashvili refused
summons to appear in court
as a witness in several criminal cases.
Later that same year,
he was accused of misuse
of power and embezzlement.
Saakashvili wound up in the US
and soon his friends in Washington
found him a new assignment.
Mikheil actively supported Maidan
and very soon was rewarded
with a high position
in the new Ukrainian government,
first as a the president's counselor,
and then as the governor of Odessa.
The day before taking this position,
he renounced his citizenship to Georgia,
the country of his birth, and
became a Ukrainian citizen.
As they say,
the battle is worth the blood
both literally and figuratively.
Geoffrey Pyatt,
the US Ambassador to Ukraine
paid a visit to Saakashvili just a month
after he took office in Odessa.
- And as long as the Odessa administration
is delivering results on Ukraine,
you're going to see a steady flow
of embassy and Washington
visitors coming here.
The meeting was fruitful
and Geoffrey, generous.
No matter how well Saakashvili's job goes,
it looks like he shouldn't be worried
about his own finances.
On his Facebook page, he
posted an official document
showing that the new governor of Odessa
gets a pretty penny from
Washington, almost $200,000 a year.
For comparison, the governor
of Maine gets $70,000 a year.
So if Odessa became a new US state,
it would be at the top of the list.
Mr. Saakashvili should feel right at home
in his newly adopted country.
He is best of friends
with fellow color revolutionary
leader, Viktor Yushchenko,
who is the godfather of his son.
A war, once launched,
doesn't choose its victims.
- We are just learning at this
hour that Malaysian Airlines
has now confirmed that it has lost contact
with one of its planes.
- The plane was indeed
shot down by a missile
while flying at a high
altitude over eastern Ukraine
near the Russian border.
298, revised number of souls
on board, all feared dead.
- It was a murder, it was a crime.
There's been this odd nonchalance
about pursuing the answers.
There was a report, a very limited report
put out a few months after the event.
But since then, they said
the next report will be
on the first anniversary of the event.
But you deal with a criminal investigation
before it becomes a cold case,
so there's been this curious element
of why is there not greater
pressure from both the media
and the Western governments
to answer these questions.
But even without any answers,
the fingers were pointed immediately.
- That's not an accident.
That is happening because
of Russian support.
Evidence indicates that
the plane was shot down
by a surface-to-air missile
that was launched from the
area that is controlled
by Russian-backed separatists
inside of Ukraine.
The Malaysian
Boeing wasn't the first plane
to play a significant part
in American-Russian relationships.
On September 1st 1983,
Korean Airlines flight 007
from New York to Seoul via
Anchorage was shot down
by a Soviet interceptor
aircraft over territory
of the USSR in the Sea of Japan.
- There was absolutely no justification,
either legal or moral,
for what the Soviets did.
The tragedy
of the Korean Boeing
was considered a perfect occasion
to demonstrate the NATO military power
within dangerous proximity to the Soviets.
On November 2nd, 1983,
NATO launched Able Archer,
a 10-day command post exercise
simulating a conflict escalation
culminating in a nuclear attack.
It was followed
by placing Pershing II
nuclear missiles in Europe.
What Reagan didn't take into consideration
was the paranoid
overreaction of the Soviets.
A recently declassified US
intelligence report shows that
for the first time since
the Cuban missile crisis
the world was that close to nuclear war.
Just like in 1983, the
Malaysian Boeing crash
was leveraged against the enemy.
A new wave of sanctions hit Russia
immediately after the tragedy.
- The United States is
imposing new sanctions
in key sectors of the Russian economy.
Almost a year
and three months later,
the Dutch Safety Board published a report.
- Ladies and gentlemen,
Flight MH17 crash was caused
because of a 9M314M warhead
detonated outside the airplane
off the left side of the cockpit.
The report didn't blame
any specific group or person
and estimated a very wide
area of 320 kilometers
as the zone from which
the missile was fired.
At the same time,
the Russian producer of
Buk missiles, Almaz-Antey,
conducted its own
independent investigation.
During the experiment,
they blew up retired
airliner with a Buk missile
and came to the conclusion
that the Malaysian plane was brought down
by the older type of missiles,
not used by Russia anymore
but still in the possession of Ukraine.
The company claims that
the missile was launched
from the territory controlled
by the Ukrainian military.
One would expect that
these controversial results
would again stir up public
interest in the investigation,
but the tragedy of Malaysian flight MH17
had already played its role
in the big geopolitical game.
Therefore, it was soon forgotten.
The goal was achieved.
After the third wave of
sanctions hit Russia,
the tensions between the
two countries skyrocketed,
so the question presents itself:
are we truly witnessing the
beginning of Cold War 2.0?
And if so, what are our chances
to survive it this time?
In 1947, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists
introduced the Doomsday Clock.
It represents a countdown to
global nuclear annihilation.
In 1953, during the
height of the Cold War,
it came its closest to midnight
as the superpowers were creating
massive nuclear arsenals.
This is the story
of America's ever-expanding
atomic weapons program.
As the world began
to grasp the insane danger
of nuclear warfare and took measures
to control the arms race,
the situation steadily improved.
In 1991, the Doomsday Clock was its
at furthest from midnight, 17 minutes.
That time of hope was short-lived, though,
as the world has become
more and more unstable.
But in 2015, the Bulletin
of Atomic Scientists
moved the clock to just
three minutes to midnight.
- Today, unchecked climate
change and a nuclear arms race
resulting from modernization
of huge arsenals
pose extraordinary and undeniable threats
to the continued existence of humanity.
The United States and Russia
have embarked on massive programs
to modernize their nuclear arsenals,
undermining the existing
nuclear weapons treaties.
The clock ticks now at just
three minutes to midnight
because international leaders are failing
to perform their most important duty:
ensuring and preserving
the health and vitality
of human civilization.