Tares Among the Wheat: Sequel to a Lamp in the Dark (2012) - full transcript
In the 19th century a revolution in biblical scholarship was prompted by the publication of a manuscript - Codex Sinaiticus - declared to be the oldest Bible ever found. Shortly after this discovery, deniers came forward against it. The controversy surrounding this manuscript is perhaps the most incredible untold chapter in Bible history. Witness the struggle between Bible believers and deniers.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
NARRATOR: For
nearly 2,000 years,
the world has been turned
upside down over what can only
be called the most
controversial book of all time.
To its critics, the Bible
is merely a combination
of myth and legend
mingled with history.
But for those who believe
in its sacred writings,
it is the inspired and
inherent word of God.
A divine record that not only
tells the way by which men get
to Heaven, but also warns of an
eternal judgment for those who
reject the light of
truth found within.
Jesus said, "And this is the
condemnation, that light is
come into the world, and men
loved darkness rather than
light, because their
deeds were evil."
[MUSIC PLAYING]
NARRATOR: After he was crucified
and raised from the dead,
the followers of Jesus Christ
went into all the world.
To the Jews first and
then to the Gentiles,
they preach that Jesus
is the true messiah
and that he suffered
for the sins of men
according to the writings
of the holy scripture.
-"To him give all
the prophets witness,
that through his name
whosoever believeth in him
shall receive
remission of sins."
NARRATOR: But Jesus himself
had said to his disciples,
"I send you forth as sheep,
in the midst of wolves."
The apostles also
warned believers
about seducing spirits
and doctrines of devils,
and of certain men
who would creep
into the church with
deception and lies.
-"But there were false
prophets also among the people,
even as there shall be
false teachers among you,
who privily shall bring
in damnable heresies,
even denying the Lord
that bought them,
and bring upon themselves
swift destruction."
[MUSIC PLAYING]
NARRATOR: Through the Middle
Ages many of the reformers
came to believe that
these warnings pertained
to the rise of the Roman church.
In the Book of Revelation
they saw the picture
of Rome's Apostasy presented
as an unfaithful woman
sitting atop a
seven headed beast.
"And upon her forehead
was a name written,
Mystery, Babylon the
Great, the Mother
of Harlots and
Abominations of the Earth.
And I saw the woman drunken
with the blood of the saints,
and with the blood of
the martyrs of Jesus."
But the Roman church did
not rise up overnight.
It came about one step at a time
through the early centuries.
DR. RONALD COOKE: If you look
at your early church history,
you had five patriarchates
that came into being.
Antioch, Jerusalem, Alexandria,
Constantinople, and Rome.
So you had five
main church centers
over the first couple
of hundred years.
But Alexandria
fell, and Jerusalem
and Antioch also fell, early on.
So you're left with
Constantinople and Rome.
So you had those
two but Rome gained
the ascendancy in the West.
DR. HENRY HUDSON:
There developed,
by the fourth, fifth, sixth
century, controversies
among all the bishops in various
parts of the world, especially
Europe and in the Middle East.
And whenever there
was a controversy,
some court had to decide
what the answer is.
DR. RONALD COOKE: And
many problems that arose,
early on theological
problems, would then
be sent to Rome to be
looked at and answers given.
NARRATOR: While the
New Testament church
had begun in ancient
Jerusalem and spread
throughout the Gentile world,
somehow the leadership of Rome
dominated as the chief
oracle in matters of debate.
DR. HENRY HUDSON:
Well, you've got
to remember the history of Rome.
The Roman Empire was a great
empire for hundreds of years.
And the popes became the
heirs to that kind of power.
NARRATOR: In the fifth century,
one of the most well known
doctors of the early
church, Augustine of Hippo,
would make reference
to a conflict that
arose between certain
African bishops.
Augustine wrote,
"In this matter,
two councils have already sent
letters to the Apostolic See
and from thence
rescripts have come back.
The cause is finished."
DR. HENRY HUDSON: What Augustine
was saying in that very
famous statement,
he was saying this.
If Rome makes a decision,
that settles it.
So they needed a court and
the prestige of the empire
was in the city of Rome
by Augustine's time.
And so that's all
he's saying, he
said, when we have an
issue, when we have
a difference of opinion,
let's turn to Rome.
NARRATOR: In the centuries that
followed, Augustine's statement
would be paraphrased
by the popes
and doctors of the Roman church.
His words were taken to
mean, "Rome has spoken,
the matter is closed."
In other words, if the Church
of Rome sets forth an opinion,
all other churches must obey.
Then, in the fifth
century, the ancient empire
suffered its decline and fell as
it was sacked by the barbarian
tribes that would reduce the
City of Seven Hills to ruin.
DR. RONALD COOKE:
Rome was overrun
by the Huns and Attila the Hun.
And so the whole system of
the empire was defeated.
And so the popes
then began to take
the place of the
ancient ceasars.
And so they came to take over
not only spiritual leadership
but also political leadership.
And so Rome from then on
grasped at more and more power.
And that's how the papacy
really came into being.
NARRATOR: While the papacy
did not spring up overnight,
and there were many events
that led to its development,
the date most often looked
to by Protestant historians
is 606 AD, when the Roman
emperor, Phocas, named Pope
Boniface the Third
the universal bishop
over all the Christian churches.
This is when the
papal power was said
to be officially
established in Rome.
ROGER OAKLAND: For a man to
say that he is the true leader
of all Christianity
is not only unbiblical
but it goes completely
against God's word
and it opens the door
for a control system
to be set up that can control
the world that Satan can use.
And so I would say
that this concept
of a pope from the beginning
was Satan's plan for man
to manipulate the church,
in the name of Christ,
but set up a system
of anti-Christ
or anti-Christian belief system.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Once the
papal system came into being,
and it was clear that it
represented an apostate system
that combined pagan
teachings and traditions
with worldly politics, all
under the mask of Christianity,
you had Christians then that
fell into two categories.
There were those who followed
after the teachings of the pope
and the Church of Rome.
And then you had those who
were known throughout history
as Bible believers, who kept
themselves separate from Rome
and were determined to base
their faith on the scriptures
alone, without any kind
of man-made doctrines
or sacred councils, which
they had in the Roman system.
NARRATOR: It was because they
rejected the pope's claims
of authority that many
Bible believers were
persecuted in the
early centuries.
English author Adrian Hilton
writes that "The Roman
pseudo-Christianity caused
many faithful believers
to flee into the mountains
of Europe and Asia Minor
to escape persecution and death.
And there they continued,
away from the world's view,
as the true Church of Christ.
DR. RONALD COOKE: These groups,
in many cases, opposed Rome.
They usually looked upon
Rome as the Antichrist.
They looked upon the
Mass as blasphemy.
They didn't believe in
the priesthood of Rome.
And many other of
the teachings of Rome
they repudiated and
claimed that they
went back to the early church.
Particularly the Waldensians,
or the Vallenses.
They claimed they
were the true Church
and they didn't
separate from Rome
but Rome separated from them.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: They were
Christians around who did not
always see eye to
eye with the pope
or the Roman Catholic Church.
In fact there were
a number of them.
INTERVIEWER (OFFSCREEN): Do you
believe these earlier groups,
the Waldenses and the
Albigenses were Christians?
DR. HENRY HUDSON: Yeah,
many of them were.
I've read their writings
and studied their history
and they were willing
to die for their faith.
DR. RONALD COOKE:
The Paulicians also
go back into Armenia and other
places, way back as early
as the fourth century.
They believe also they were
continuing the true Church
and opposed, they
opposed, everything
about the papal
church and looked
upon it as the Anti-Christ.
NARRATOR: The belief that these
earlier groups were in fact
Christians was
held by nearly all
of the reformers including men
like John Wickliffe, Martin
Luther, John Calvin,
and many others.
In fact, many Christians
are familiar with the idea
of America as a city on a hill.
Well that speech was originally
given by Governor John
Winthrop, who was
one of the founders
of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
And as he and the other
Puritans came to the New World,
he gave this speech
about America, or they
themselves, as a city on a hill.
But at the beginning
of that speech,
he makes reference
to the Waldenses
as an example of
Christian charity.
In his speech, Winthrop said,
"We are a company professing
ourselves fellow
members of Christ.
We ought to account ourselves
knit together by this bond
of love, and live in
the exercise of it.
This was notorious in the
practice of the Christians
in former times as is
testified of the Waldenses.
They used to love or any
of their own religion,
even before they were
acquainted with them."
Nevertheless, modern
histories continue
to report that these early
Bible believers were heretics
who believed in
occult doctrines.
INTERVIEWER (OFFSCREEN): What
do you say to people who present
those modern,
historic arguments?
DR. RONALD COOKE: Well, I
would say, first of all,
that a lot of our
history comes from Rome.
We have to recognize that.
It was old Gibbon who said
that when the wars are fought,
the victors tell the story.
I'm not getting
his words exactly,
but that's the gist
of what he says.
He says, in other words, it is
the victors who tell the story.
So if you're a defeated
Christian small group,
then you are--
your story is told
from the standpoint of
those who conquered you.
And Pelican, the
modern American scholar
says, and there is no other way,
many times, to tell the story.
NARRATOR: The common charge
against the Waldenses
and Albigenses is that these
groups held to unorthodox ideas
about God and that they
were guilty of what
was called the Manichean heresy.
DR. RONALD COOKE: The Manicheans
believed, they were dualists,
they believed in a God of
good and a God of evil.
And that was one of the
great heresies of the church.
NARRATOR: In time,
the word Manichean
came to be a general
term for heresy
but did not necessarily mean
that a person actually believed
the doctrines of the Manicheans.
When Martin Luther begin the
Reformation, the Synod of Sens
accused him of
being a Manichean.
In fact, modern
historian SJ Barnett
writes that, "During and
after the Reformation,
Catholic propagandists
hoped to undermine
the legitimacy of Protestantism.
Catholic apologists usually
designated Luther and Calvin
as Manichean heretics from the
third century dualist heresy."
DR. RONALD COOKE: When they
couldn't find anything wrong
with a so-called
heretic, they would
charge them with Manicheanism.
Because that was always
punishable by death.
So if I couldn't find
out that you were
a heretic in some other way,
then I would just charge you
as being a Manichean and that
way I could put you to death
and I didn't have to prove
a whole lot of other things
against you.
So that was one of
the tactics of Rome--
was to charge whatever
groups were being charged
with whatever heresies they
were being investigated
for-- to charge them with
Manicheanism so that their case
could be made easier and they
could be shown to be true
heretics.
So you cannot take a lot of
the information that we get.
You have to certainly
investigate it thoroughly
to find out what
these groups believed.
ROGER OAKLAND: They
refused to acknowledge
the dogmas, or the ideas or
the doctrines that were being
promoted by men, that
weren't biblical.
And so they took a
biblical position
and because of their biblical
position, they were persecuted.
NARRATOR: As we said earlier,
most of the reformers
believed that the charges of
heresy against these earlier
groups were falsely
created by Rome
to justify her persecutions.
Yet most Protestant historians
believe that the Waldenses
and the Albigenses were
forerunners of the Reformation.
19th century historian
William Jones
wrote, "That to justify the
Wldenses and Albigenses is
indeed to defend the
Reformation and Reformers.
They having so long before
us, with an exemplary courage,
labored to preserve
the Christian religion
in its ancient purity
which the Church of Rome
all this while has
endeavored to abolish."
To be more specific, it
would be more accurate to say
that the popes have
endeavored to abolish biblical
Christianity in favor
of a religious system
of their own making.
And because of
this, they have seen
the Bible as their chief enemy.
And this is the reason
why they outlawed it
from being read by
the common people.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Throughout history, they
gave different pronouncements
saying that you can't
give these holy
things to the swine.
And they used that scripture--
it's completely bogus-- pearls
before swine doesn't
have anything
to do with giving the
life-giving scripture
to the people, but the
Roman Catholic Church just
looked at the common man
as pigs who could not
possibly understand
the scriptures.
NARRATOR: Because of this,
Martin Luther, and eventually
the rest of the reformers, came
to believe that the pope was
the fulfillment of biblical
warnings concerning
the greatest enemy of Christ.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: If you make
a study of the life of Luther,
you'll find that there was a
very slow transition from 1517,
when he nailed the 95 Theses
to the door, to about the year
1520.
So that's only a
matter of three years.
But from someone who thought
he was being faithful
to the church-- even
though it was the Roman
church-- to the time
he gets to 1520,
and there's a bull which
actually excommunicates him,
he turns and he actually
says that I am convinced now
that the pope sitting on
the throne there in Rome
is the Antichrist.
Because he was so contrary--
his power and teaching
so contrary-- to the basic
truths of the gospel.
NARRATOR: Luther and many others
preached the gospel of grace
and brought forth the
Protestant Reformation.
But their chief obstacle
was the conflict
between the biblical teaching
of salvation by faith in Christ
as a free gift from God versus
Rome's teaching of a work
salvation based on the rituals
of the Catholic church.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: The
Roman church was teaching,
had been teaching, for five
hundred years or longer,
that a man is
saved by his works.
And then, some of the
contemporary scholars
say you're wrong.
Because the medieval
theologians did
believe that the
power, or the-- they
called it the potentia
absoluta-- the potent power,
the absolute power
of God can save
a soul by grace through faith.
Yeah, they did say that.
But then they said,
yeah but there's
the potentia ordinata of God.
And you'll say,
well, what is that?
Well, while God could do
that because he's absolutely
sovereign, that's not
the method he ordained.
The method he ordained was
the church and the ordinances,
or the sacraments.
And through the sacraments,
if a man-- the terms are very
clear-- you have
to factura en quad
se est. That's Latin
for a man has to do,
within himself, what he has
to do to prepare himself
for what's called the
merit of congruity.
And when he does
that, then God comes
in with a merit of condignity.
So it's a very, very
complicated process.
And that's still believed today.
And yet it goes back
to the middle ages.
Because you're building up a
storehouse of merit, and that's
the whole system.
INTERVIEWER (OFFSCREEN): Is that
basically works righteousness?
DR. HENRY HUDSON: Yeah,
that's exactly what it is.
NARRATOR: While
such debates might
seem tedious in
the modern world,
to the people of the Middle Ages
the understanding of salvation
was quite literally a
matter of life and death.
Centuries later, and the
doctrine of work salvation
through sacraments and rituals
continues in the Church of Rome
today, where more than
one billion Catholics
follow the teachings
of the pope.
DR. RONALD COOKE: To deceive
one billion people about
their eternal destiny, I think
you cannot get a greater lie
than that, nor a greater
misrepresentation
of the scripture.
When it says Christ has purged
our sins when he sat down
at the right hand of
the majesty on high--
and in the Latin vulgate,
that is purgatorium--
it's the very same root from
which they get purgatory.
But the Bible teaches
nothing about purgatory.
The Bible teaches that
Christ has purged our sins
and taken our sins in
his own body on the tree
that we might go free
and be pardoned and not
have to go to some
purgatorial fires
to get our sins purged away.
So it's a blasphemy against
the cross-work of Christ
and the resurrection of
Christ that assures us
that our sins have been
forgiven and that we stand
justified before God
through the cross-work,
death and resurrection
of Christ.
NARRATOR: To oppose
the papal teaching,
the reformers declared that
salvation was by God's grace
alone, through faith
alone, in Christ alone.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: Where
John Fox and the reformers,
they rediscovered-- beginning
with Martin Luther--
the just shall live by faith.
NARRATOR: And to
prove their doctrine,
they were determined to make
the Bible available to all men.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Martin Luther
took Erasmus' 1519, a
Greek New Testament,
and he translated his
September Bible, 1522.
And they were sold
as quick as they
could come off the
printing press.
And people began
reading it and realized
that Rome was telling them lies.
And they begin
trusting Jesus Christ.
Hence, you had the start of the
Reformation in Germany there.
NARRATOR: From Germany, Luther's
teaching spread to England
and would influence William
Tyndale, the man whose mission
would be to ensure that
even a common plow boy could
read the word of God.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
started reading the word of God.
He had a desire for the
people to have the word of God
and so the Reformation
just breaks out.
And Roman Catholicism,
the Catholics, they
can't put a lid on it.
Because once the people get the
Bible in their own language,
the Bible says you
shall know the truth
and the truth will
make you free.
And people started getting
this huge burden of sin
off of their shoulders.
I think of Thomas Bilney.
Thomas Bilney thought he was
the Judas of his generation.
And so he thought he
would do something
that was worthy of betrayal.
And so he went out
and secretly bought
an Erasmus New Testament.
And he opened it
to 1 Timothy, where
Paul says he's the
chiefest of sinners
and that Christ came into
the world to die for them.
He says if God can forgive
Paul, he can forgive me.
He was gloriously saved.
And let me just tell you,
he went to confession.
And he goes and
confesses to Latimer.
Tells Latimer, father
Latimer, he tells him,
father, I've sinned.
I went and bought this
Greek New Testament
and I read about how
Jesus Christ forgives sins
and I've trusted Jesus
Christ as my personal Savior.
And Latimer says,
in his own words,
reading "Fox's Book of Martyrs,"
I learned more that day,
from that confession of Thomas
Bilney that I had learned
in 20 years of
studying the scripture.
It happened to be that
Hugh Latimer comes
to know Jesus Christ
as his personal Savior.
So as the word of God gets
out, Chris, it's like a fire.
It goes and people read
it, and they're set free.
And I'll tell you, Bilney says
it was sweeter than eating
fresh honey out of
the honeycomb as he's
talking about the scriptures.
Even it's said of
William Tyndale,
he was a man who was singularly
addicted to the scriptures.
NARRATOR: Like William Tyndale,
Thomas Bilney and Hugh Latimer
would both be condemned
by the Church of Rome
and were burned at the stake for
their faith in the word of God.
Nevertheless, their
sacrifice was not in vain,
as their deaths and
those of many others,
inspired countless souls
across Europe to turn from Rome
and embrace the true gospel.
VOICE OFFSCREEN: And they were
burning the saints of God.
Thank God the the gospel
burned with mighty fire.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
cast kept them
opressed and surpressed
and it kept them under
a bondage of guilt.
And Jesus Christ through the
scriptures sets them free.
The Holy Spirit used the holy
word of God to set them free.
NARRATOR: But this
freedom would not
be proclaimed
without consequence.
The Church of Rome responded
with its own counter attack.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: To understand
what the Vatican did next,
we have to realize
the tremendous impact
that the Reformation had.
Protestant historian JA Wylie
wrote that the Reformation had
transformed whole
countries all over Europe
and it would ultimately
change the world.
NARRATOR: Wylie wrote that,
"Advancing over all opposition,
this great religious revival,
not yet half a century old
had acquired a strength and
a breadth truly amazing.
From the little Saxon
town of Wittenburg,
it had spread itself
out, comprehending
the powerful kingdoms of
Saxony, Pomerania, Poland,
Bohemia, Hungary,
and Transylvania.
The Reformation had been
welcomed by Norway, Sweden,
Denmark, Holland,
and the Netherlands.
Its career had been one of
unimpeded, continuous victory.
The South and West of
France were Protestant,
and the supremacy
of the Reformation
seemed all but certain.
Of the countries
of Western Europe,
only two, Italy and Spain,
now remained with the pope."
DR. RONALD COOKE:
They didn't take
Martin Luther
seriously at first.
Nor did they take his
movement very seriously.
But as it began to
spread, they realized
they had a real fight on
their hands, so to speak.
NARRATOR: In 1540,
the pope commissioned
a former Spanish soldier,
named Ignatius Loyola,
to form a military
company of priests
within the Catholic church.
Their chief purpose was to
launch a Counter Reformation,
to destroy the work
of the reformers,
and bring the
Protestant churches back
under the authority of the pope.
They were named the Society of
Jesus, or as their enemies call
them, the Jesuits.
DR. RONALD COOKE: Malachi
Catholic writer, would
practically call them
the storm troopers
of the papacy.
Their idea was to defeat the
Protestant churches there
that were going on
throughout Europe
at the time of the Reformation.
And then to continue that
work in education, the forming
of universities,
colleges, seminaries,
all across America
and across Europe.
So the Jesuits really have been
engaged in just about every
kind of activity known to man,
educational, and subversive,
intrigue.
And many people have said they
were linked to assassinations.
So the Counter Reformation
involved wars, sieges,
everything under the sun, to
try to defeat Protestantism.
NARRATOR: But the key point
of contention was the Bible.
It was how the reformers
understood the scripture
and preached to the
population at large that
was the greatest threat to Rome.
-They're dangerous.
They're dangerous
to everything we
believe as the Catholic church.
And we've got to do
something to stop it.
NARRATOR: With the
printing press,
the Bible was being
translated and duplicated
at unprecedented rates
throughout Europe.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
There was a rash
of Bible translation
and Bible publication.
And it all came to
a screeching halt
after the King James
version of the Bible.
Virtually all translation stops.
There was such a
flurry from 1526
until 1611.
It was so meticulously
done by people
who believed that God
had inspired his word.
NARRATOR: The King
James translation
would in time be considered
the crowning achievement
of the Protestant Reformation
and would come to symbolize all
that the martyrs had
suffered for the word of God.
But because of its association
with the reform, something
the Vatican saw as
an act of rebellion
against her authority,
the King James version
would come to be hated by Rome.
DR. ALAN O'REILLY: That is
the fruit of the Reformation
that the Jesuits want
to destroy above all.
Because until they do that,
they cannot be sure of getting
the entire world, and
especially England,
back under the
thrall of the popary.
NARRATOR: In 1825, the Jesuits,
meeting in Chieri, Italy,
declared their intention to
seize control of the Bible
as part of their
centuries-old plan
to bring all the world
under the power of Rome.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: If you
study the Jesuits in history,
you discover that they operate
more like an intelligence
community, like the CIA or MI6,
rather than a religious order.
And they are primarily
the supporters
of what is called papist
or Romanist doctorine.
And this is the belief that Rome
should govern the whole world.
It does not necessarily
apply to all Catholics,
because many Catholics
don't agree with it.
But papist doctrine is
essentially the belief
that because the pope
is the Vicar of Christ,
and he stands in the
place of Christ himself,
and because Christ
is the King of Kings,
therefore, the pope should have
the authority to reign over
all the kings and
princes on planet Earth.
And it is this doctrine
that led to nearly
all the wars of old Europe.
NARRATOR: Even in the
late 19th century,
Rome's plan for
world dominion was
known and documented
among English churchmen.
In 1888, a meeting of the
Protestant missions in London
=ed that "the missionary
program of the Vatican,
doubt it who may, embraces
the conversion of Britain
and the United States of
America, and through them,
the subjugation of
the whole world."
NARRATOR: To
accomplish their aims,
the Jesuits deemed it necessary
to take control of the Bible.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Because the
Bible exposes all of the lies
and the false doctrines
of the papacy,
it has always been
hated by Rome.
And they've admitted repeatedly
that the teaching of scripture
contradicts the teaching--
the official teaching--
of the Roman Catholic Church.
And so once you realize
that's the real conflict.
It's between the
authority of the pope
versus the authority
of the Bible.
And at that point
the Jesuit doctrines
begin to make a lot more sense.
NARRATOR: In modern times,
the Jesuit view of the Bible
was exposed by
Doctor Ian Paisley,
the former first minister of
Northern Ireland, who has spent
decades fighting against Rome's
influence in his own country.
-We're not responsible
for the violence.
The violence comes from
the Roman Catholic Church.
NARRATOR: Calling himself
a historic Protestant,
Paisley has continually
protested the authority
of the pope, both politically
and theologically.
-Ulster will not fall to him.
-I want you to see this wafer
after it is consecrated.
The church of Rome teaches, that
it is the actual body, bones,
blood, sinews and
deity of Jesus Christ.
[CROWD APPLAUSE]
-The Lord Jesus Christ
offered on the cross one
full, complete, and never to
be repeated sacrifice for sins.
And God does not
come down from Heaven
at the whim of a
bachelor priest.
[CROWD APPLAUSE]
NARRATOR: In more recent
years, Paisley spoke openly
on European radio exposing
a document that reveals
the Jesuit's view
of the Bible versus
the authority of the pope.
DR. IAN PAISLEY: Bishop
Wordsworth, an eminent Church
of England divine, uncovers
the secrecy of the Jesuits
in the exposure of a
document, used by them
in their early days
to compel Protestants
to submit to Mother Church.
Roman Catholic
Confession publicly
prescribed and
proposed to protestants
on their admission to the
Roman Catholic Church.
We confess that we've
been brought from heresy,
to the true saving
Roman Catholic faith.
By the singular care of
our supreme governors,
and by the diligance
and aid of our masters,
the fathers of all
the Order of Jesuits.
And we desire to certify this by
our vows to the world at large.
We confess that whatever
new thing the Pope ordains,
whether it be in scripture
or not in scripture,
and whatever he commands
is divine and therefore
ought to be held by lay
people in greater esteem
than the precepts
of the living God.
We confess that the
reading of holy scripture
is the origin of
heresy, and schism
and the source of blasphemy.
We confess that holy
scripture is imperfect,
and a dead letter until it
is explained by the Supreme
Pontiff, and allowed by him
to be read by the laity.
We confess and assert that the
pope is our most holy father,
is to be obeyed on all
things, without any exception,
and that such heretics
as contravene his orders,
are not only to
be burnt but to be
delivered body
and soul to Hell."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Since the Middle Ages,
that Jesuit's core agenda
has had to do with compelling
their followers to renounce
the authority of the Bible
in favor of the
authority of the pope.
Then in the 19th century,
their movement gained momentum
and through their
textual critics
they insisted that the
Bible was a flawed book.
And they set about
trying to prove
all the flaws they
could to the world.
And at the same
time, they officially
declared through
Vatican Council one
that the pope was infallible.
So their message was clear.
Don't trust the
Bible, trust the pope.
The Bible's a flawed book,
the pope is infallible.
And so this brought everything
full circle to the conflict
that had been raging
for hundreds of years
throughout the Middle Ages.
And that's ultimately what
their meeting in Chieri, Italy
was all about.
NARRATOR: The information
discussed by Jesuit leaders
in Chieri was published
in 1848 by a former Jesuit
initiate named Jacopo Leone.
His book was titled
The Jesuit Conspiracy,
The Secret Plan of the Order.
In it, he claimed to have
overheard the plans of Jesuit
leaders and was compelled to
write down the information
and publish it as a warning
to the rest of the world.
Leone wrote specifically
of how the Jesuits
intended to take
control of the Bible.
Allegedly, they said "Then
the Bible, that serpent which,
with head erect and
eyes flashing fire,
threatens us with its venom,
shall be changed again
into a rod, as soon as
we are able to seize it.
Oh then, mysterious rod!
We will not again suffer thee
to escape from our hands.
For you know too well, that
for three centuries past,
this cruel asp has
left us no repose.
You well know with what
folds it entwines us,
and with what
fangs it gnaws us."
According to Leone,
one of the Jesuits
openly admitted that
the scriptures do not
support the Roman
Catholic faith.
Speaking of the Bible he said,
"If I may tell you openly
what I think of this book,
it is not at all for us.
It is against us.
I do not wonder at the
invincible obstinancy
it engenders in all those who
regard its verses as inspired.
In the simplicity
of youth, I fully
expected on opening the
New Testament to find there
the authority of a superior
chief in the Church.
The worship of the Virgin,
the mass, purgatory, relics.
But in every page, I found
my expectations disappointed.
At last, after having read,
at least six times over,
that little book, I was forced
to acknowledge to myself
that it actually
sets forth a system
of religion,
altogether different."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: What this
Jesuit priest acknowledged all
the way back in the 19th
century is the same thing
that the reformers acknowledge.
They noticed that the
teachings of the Bible
and the teachings of the pope
were dramatically different.
The difference is that
the reformers chose
to follow the Bible,
while the Jesuits chose
to fight against it on
behalf of the traditions
and power of the
Catholic church.
NARRATOR: The view of that
Jesuits toward the Bible
could be likened to that of
the ancient Pharisees 2000
years ago, who opposed Christ.
As Jesus said of
them, "Full well,
ye reject the commandment
of God that ye
may keep your own tradition."
And again, he
said, "In vain they
do worship me,
teaching for doctrines
the commandments of men.
At their meeting
and Chieri in 1825,
the Jesuits
discussed the methods
to be used in their ongoing
Counter Reformation,
and their plan for the
subversion of the Bible.
They said specifically
that "A few breaches made
in Protestantism-- whether
these conversions proceed
from genuine motives, or
whether they be determined
by advantageous offers,
which shall not be spared
if the person be
worth the trouble--
we ought, by every
possible means,
to secure the aid
of modern thinkers.
If they can be induced to
write at all in our favor,
let us pay them well either
in money or in laudation."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The Jesuits,
since the Middle Ages,
have been known
for seducing people
outside the Catholic
church-- even members
of Protestant churches--
And making deals
with them to help
the cause of Rome.
And this was especially
revealed in the 19th century,
during what was called the
Oxford Movement in England.
And it was in the
wake of this movement
that the Vatican
really pushed to try
and take control of the Bible.
And that's why it's so
important to understand what
the Oxford Movement
was all about.
DR. ALAN O'REILLY: In 1833,
the Oxford Movement started.
It's perhaps not
without significance
that we're not only looking
at what Rome is doing,
we have to consider that
the lord himself will bring
judgment on a nation
that foresakes
him and foresakes
the word of God.
The Oxford Movement
was an attempt,
effectively, to Romanise
the Church of England
and to get the Church of England
away from the scriptures--
from the King James
Bible-- and back
to the ritualistic
practices of Rome.
Now, it was done in
a very subtle manner
and it really typified
the Jesuit approach
of Bishop Olatom which is,
above all, not too much zeal.
And it tried to portray the
true position of the Church
of England as a sort of a
middle of the road organization.
But at the same time, it
did promote what it called
a high view of the sacraments.
So that, although it professed
to be against what it regarded
as extreme Protestants--
sad to say,
Bible believing evangelicals--
and also what it regarded
as extreme Romanism--
say, the persecutions
by Catholocism.
The Inquisition, perhaps--
nevertheless it
sought gradually,
by publications of what were
called Tracts for Our Times,
to give a favorable view to
things like the Roman mass.
NARRATOR: In 1898, a man
named Walter Walsh published
a book titled The Secret
History of the Oxford Movement.
In it, he writes about the
activities of the Jesuits
in England.
He recorded the testimony of
a former Catholic priest who
told him, "In England, there
are a greater number of Jesuits
than in Italy.
There are Jesuits in
all classes of society.
In Parliament, among
the English clergy,
among the Protestant laity,
even in the higher stations."
He went on to say, "I could not
comprehend how a Jesuit could
be a Protestant, or how or
Protestant could be a Jesuit.
But my confessor
silenced my scruples
by telling me that Saint
Paul became as a Jew
that he might save the Jews.
It was no wonder therefore, if
a Jesuit should feign himself
a Protestant for the
conversion of Protestants."
Within less than 20 years
after the Oxford Movement,
another movement began in the
world of biblical scholarship
that would almost
completely transform
the understanding of the Bible.
This transformation
would be affected
by men who were of the
Protestant profession,
but strangely worked in
cooperation with Rome.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
NARRATOR: Prior to
the 19th century,
Protestant scholars
depended on a collection
of Greek manuscripts
that had come into Europe
after the fall of
Constantinople in 1453.
Collectively, these manuscripts
would form the foundation
of the New Testament Greek
used by the reformers.
By men like William
Tyndale, Martin Luther,
the Geneva Bible translators,
and the translation team
for the King James
version of 1611.
These Greek manuscripts
were collated
first by Erasmus of Rotterdam.
Erasmus would lay the foundation
for the traditional text
and further the belief
that the scripture
should be read by all people.
ALEXANDRE VANAUTGAERDEN:
To translate to French,
to English, to
German at this time.
Because it was very
important for Erasmus
that everybody can read the
Bible in his own speaking.
He produced five editions
of his translation
in 1516, 1519, 1522,
1529, and 1535.
All the editions were
published in Basil.
-The Erasmus 1522, it
was really revolutionary
because here we have in
this column-- and just
the beautiful artwork--
but in this column,
you have the Greek.
And what Erasmus did that really
blew people out of the water,
most people could not read Greek
back then, but many of them
could read Latin.
Scholars could read Latin.
He took the Greek and he
translated it into Latin.
And so many people had their
eyes open because they started
reading Erasmus' new translation
of the Latin from the Greek
and they found out that it was
completely different than what
they had in the Latin vulgate
of the Roman Catholic Church.
Then you'll see here,
MDXXII, that is 1522.
VOICE OFFSCREEN:
So this is Erasmus'
second or third edition?
-This is Erasmus' third edition.
It is the Foundation
for Textus Receptus'.
Then we come to Luke.
Again, the Latin and the Greek
that Erasmus had translated.
We can go all the way
back to the apocalypse,
so this is actually the Acts
of the Apostles right here.
But it, of course, goes all the
way through-- page after page
after page-- there we go,
the apocalypse, Revelation.
NARRATOR: The work
begun by Erasmus
would be later continued
by Robert Stephanus, whose
1550 Greek addition would be
used for the Geneva Bible.
In time, his work
would be furthered
by the famed calvinus
scholar, Theodore Beza.
Beza's 1598 Greek New
Testament was chiefly
used for the King
James version of 1611.
But it would be some years
later that the Elsevier brothers
in Holland would publish
the work even further
and give the reformer's
Greek its official name.
In the introduction
of their 1633 addition
they wrote, "What you have
here is the text which is now
received by all
in which, we give
nothing changed or corrupted."
Hence, the Greek of the
Protestant Reformation
would become known as Textus
Receptus, the received texts.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So that
becomes the standard Greek
for Protestant scholars,
and remained so
for nearly 300 years.
NARRATOR: But in
the 19th century,
a German scholar named
Constantin von Tischendorf
would publish what would
become known as the most
ancient Biblical
manuscript ever recovered.
His discovery would turn the
world of Bible scholarship
upside down, convincing
many that his manuscript
was a lost version of the Bible.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
You have to go back
before that, with
German higher criticism.
And they developed a theory,
called the Recension Theory,
and in this Recension
Theory, they
say that the Bible was lost.
NARRATOR: The Recension Theory
was introduced by a man named
Johann Semler in
the 18th century.
One of his disciples,
Jakob Griesbach,
would popularize his theory
among German intellectuals.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Both
Semler and Griesbach
held to unorthodox views of
Christianity, to say the least.
Semler is known as the
father of German rationalism,
and he clearly
influenced Griesbach.
Rationalism in Germany is very
much like the Enlightenment
in France, where they rejected
the idea of the divinity
of Christ because they rejected
the supernatural elements
of the Bible.
The virgin birth, Christ
being raised from the dead,
him ascending, and so on.
All of that to
them in France, it
was unreasonable because
of the reason movement.
Well, in Germany
it was irrational,
hence the term rationalism.
So they believed it was
irrational to believe
those things, so
they rejected them.
And this was the view of
both Semler and Griesbach.
So Semler and
Griesbach were two men
who essentially
rejected the gospel.
And the rationalism
that they were known for
took hold in Germany and Germany
then became the epicenter
for higher criticism
against the Bible.
NARRATOR: The concentration
of activity in Germany
is believed to have been the
working of the Jesuits, whose
aim was to destroy the
confidence of Protestants
in the inerrancy of scripture.
This was acknowledged by
Doctor Ian Paisley, who
had this to say about the
ongoing war waged by Rome
and the Jesuits
against the Bible.
DR. IAN PAISLEY: "And
it's not the word of man,
it's the word of God.
Now, of course, Rome
used to burn the Bibles.
She used to burn the people
that translated them.
She used to burn the
people that read them.
But that didn't succeed.
So, she decided
upon another scheme.
That she would place
her Jesuit priests
in the training of
Protestant ministers.
And so, into the universities
of Germany, Rome set at work
the whole structure of
unbelieving higher criticism.
And she had in the
universities men
who sought to destroy
belief in the Bible.
And we became cursed with what
was known as higher criticism.
And young men had their
faith in the Bible
destroyed in the universities
and in the training colleges.
And so, the men that
came out to be ordained
didn't believe the book.
They didn't believe the
creeds of the church.
They didn't believe in the
historic Christian faith.
And they set to work
to destroy the faith."
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: With that
spirit of textual criticism
and non-belief in the
inspiration of the word of God,
looking at the Bible just like
any other book, scholars--
and even quote,
Christian scholars--
began to follow that line.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Textual
criticism in the proper sense
is not necessarily a bad thing.
DR. D.A. WAITE:
Textual criticism
is a word that is used to
assess the value of one
great manuscript over another.
That's what it is.
It's the bringing of
manuscripts together,
and then showing which
is the one to go with
and which is the
one not to go with.
NARRATOR: The practice
of textual criticism
began in the Middle
Ages and grew out
of the conflicts between Rome
and the Protestant Reformation.
It is most often traced
to a 17th century scholar,
named Richard Simon.
DR. H.D. WILLIAMS:
He is the one who
is alleged to have really
begun this whole process.
He's called the father
of textual criticism.
He was a French Roman
Catholic priest.
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
In the world today,
textual criticism can mean
several different things,
depending on who's
using that term
and how it's being applied.
You have textual criticism
in the ordinary sense, which
is simply a process of going
through ancient manuscripts,
collating them, and trying
to remove any errors,
and trying to figure out
what the original text was
and what it should be.
Then you have what is known
as higher criticism, which
is where you give a historical
analysis of the manuscripts.
And then you begin to question
whether or not Moses could have
really written the
book of Genesis,
or whether Peter could have
written the apostles ascribed
to him, and you begin to
question the authorship
and the historical
nature of the Bible.
And this was the
process that is usually
traced to Richard Simon.
NARRATOR: Simon entered
the priesthood in 1670.
He was initially educated
by Jesuit priests
and then later at the
Sorbonne in Paris.
He would go on to enter the
Congregation of the Oratory.
The purpose of the
Oratory was said
to be "to interpose a
barrier to the continuous and
disquieting progress
of Protestantism."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
All of the orders
that Simon was involved
with-- whether the Jesuits,
or the Sorbonne in Paris,
and then the Oratory--
they were all involved
in variant forms
of the Counter Reformation.
They were all looking
for different ways
to try and overthrow
the Protestant movement.
NARRATOR: Yet Simon's focus
was guided by the Jesuits
from the beginning.
It was they who laid the
foundation for Simon's work
through one of their
original members,
Alfonso Salmeron, who had joined
with Ignatius Loyola in 1534.
We read that, "Salmeron paved
the way for Richard Simon.
The Jesuits introduced into
Catholic reading of the Bible
the parameters of
time, place, context
and semantic structures."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The idea of
applying principles of time
and context don't necessarily
sound like a bad thing
until you realize how
they were being used
as weapons to try and
undermine the Bible.
One example was a book that
was written by another Roman
Catholic named Isaac La
Peyrere during the same area.
And he had written a book
called Men Before Adam
in 1655, in which he argued that
supposedly new information--
scientific data that had
come to light from Greenland,
and China, and so on-- proved
that men lived on the Earth
as far back as 50,000 BC.
Thus throwing into jeopardy the
traditional date for creation
in Genesis, which goes
back to about 4,000 BC.
NARRATOR: We read that "La
Peyrere deployed the hypothesis
of men before Adam in order
to attack the Calvinist
Method of interpreting
scripture according
to the literal sense."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: And so the
idea of higher criticism,
which grew out of this movement
and is also called historic
criticism, the idea behind it
is to arrange certain dates
in history around the Bible in
such a way to make it appear
that the Bible is not a
historically accurate book
and therefore cannot
possibly be the inspired
inerrant word of God.
That's the whole point of it.
NARRATOR: La Peyrere's work
would have a powerful influence
over Richard Simon,
who would further
the assault against
reform teaching.
We read that, "Simon
sharpened historical criticism
into a weapon that could
be used in the attack
on Protestantism's
most fundamental error,
the doctrine of Sola Scriptura."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Sola Scriptura was
one of the mottos
of the reformation
and it means, only
the scripture.
And it's the idea that the
Christian faith should be based
on the teachings of the Bible
alone without any interference
with the doctrines
or teachings of men.
And it's in contrast to the
Roman Catholic teaching, which
says that church tradition
should govern the understanding
of the Bible even
if the two disagree.
NARRATOR: In defense
of his Catholic faith,
Richard Simon wrote that, "The
great changes that have taken
place in the
manuscripts of the Bible
since the first originals
were lost completely
destroy the principle
of the Protestants.
If tradition is not
joined to scripture
there is hardly
anything in religion
that one can
confidently affirm."
But the Bible says of itself
that the scriptures alone
are sufficient for the spiritual
needs of all believers.
The apostle Paul wrote that,
"all scripture is given
by inspiration of God and
is profitable for doctrine,
for reproof, for correction, for
instruction in righteousness,
that the man of
God may be perfect,
thoroughly furnished
unto all good works."
Furthermore, God promises that
he will preserve his words
eternally and that
they cannot be lost.
The Psalmist writes, "Thy word
is true from the beginning,
and every one of thy righteous
judgments endureth forever."
Jesus said, "The scriptures
cannot be broken"
and "Heaven and earth
shall pass away,
but my words shall
not pass away.
For all flesh is grass,
and all the glory
of man as the
flower of the grass.
The grass withereth, and the
flower thereof falleth away
but the Word of the
Lord endureth forever."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
you can define the conflict
between Catholicism
and Protestantism as a
conflict between the authority
of the pope versus the
authority of the Bible.
And this is the whole
reason why the Bible came
to be known as the paper
pope of Protestantism.
That was the name given
to it by the Catholics.
And these arguments
against the Bible
were especially active
in the 19th century,
during the same era that
Constantin von Tischendorf went
searching for his ancient texts.
NARRATOR: The hostility of
Catholics toward the Protestant
Bible was written of by 19th
century historian John Dowling
in his book, The Burning of the
Bibles, where he documented how
Catholics in Champlain, New York
were burning bibles in America
back in 1843.
The beliefs of Catholics during
the 19th and early 20th century
can be shown by the teaching
of Cardinal James Gibbons,
pictured here with President
Theodore Roosevelt.
Gibbons was the
Archbishop of Baltimore
and in his book,
Faith of Our Fathers,
he wrote, "Now the
scriptures alone
do not contain all the truths
which a Christian is bound
to believe because
they do not contain
all the truths necessary
for salvation."
A similar view had been espoused
in England by Cardinal John
Henry Newman,
perhaps the leading
Catholic apologist
of the 19th century.
Speaking of the Bible he said,
"Surely the sacred volume
was never intended to
teach us our creed.
And from the first, it has
been the error of heretics
to attempt of themselves a
work to which they are unequal,
the eliciting of a
systematic doctrine
from the scattered
notices of truth
which Scripture contains."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Essentially
what Newman is saying
is that the error of
the heretics, so-called,
was that they followed the
example of the ancient Boreans,
who searched the
scriptures daily
to test the things
that they were hearing.
And this is something
that the Church of Rome
has always discouraged.
NARRATOR: One of
Newman's contemporaries
was a renowned priest named
Thomas Edward Bridget, who
said that true faith was
"a surrender of the mind,
to a living authority,
known to be divine.
Not a puzzle over
documents, with the doubt
about correct interpretation."
Even the modern Catholic
Encyclopedia openly
declares that "The supremacy
of the Bible as source of faith
is unhistorical, illogical,
fatal to the virtue of faith,
and destructive of unity."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So we see
that Rome's view of the Bible
has not changed in 1,000 years.
The reformers in
their day were trying
to recover the ancient
scripture in such a way
that they could have
a full understanding
of the word of God.
But in contrast,
the Church of Rome
went about looking for
weaknesses in the text
so that the Protestant
doctrine of Sola Scriptura
could be overthrown.
That's the difference.
DR. H.D. WILLIAMS: They were
losing people very rapidly
because of the text
that was preserved
by the priesthood of believers.
Because they were losing people
from the Roman Catholic See,
from their authority.
They had to do something
to counter that influence.
NARRATOR: But while they
were fighting against Sola
Scriptura, they were at the
same time arguing in defense
of the Latin Vulgate, which had
been declared by the Council
of Trent to be the only true,
authoritative scripture.
DR. ALAN O'REILLY: And
they also condemned
Luther's conclusion
that Jerome's Vulgate
was a corrupt Bible--
which we know it is--
and they further
condemned Luther's
conclusion that to
produce a pure Bible,
either German or English
or any other language,
you did have to go
back to what today we
would call the traditional text.
That is, for example, the Greek
text of the New Testament,
which is found in
the vast majority
of surviving Greek manuscripts.
NARRATOR: In their introduction
to the Douay-Rheims Bible,
the Jesuit scholars wrote,
"Se see that by all means,
the old vulgar Latin translation
is approved, good, and better
than the Greek text itself and
that there is no cause why it
should give place to any other
text, copies, or readings."
16th century Anglican
scholar, William Whitaker
said that "The Papists contend
that their Latin text is
authentic of itself,
and ought not
to be tried by the
text of the originals."
Meanwhile, Protestant
scholar Francis Turretin
summed up the debate this way.
He said, "The question is
whether the original text,
in Hebrew or in Greek, has
been so corrupted either
by the carelessness of copyists,
or by the malice of the Jews
and heretics that it
can no longer be held
as the judge by which all
versions are to be judged.
The Roman Catholics
affirm this, we deny it."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
So Rome's position,
according to Turretin, was
that the Greek and the Hebrew
manuscripts had been
so corrupted over time
that they could not be trusted.
And therefore you shouldn't use
those manuscripts to correct
the Latin Vulgate, which is
what Erasmus had done back
right before the
Reformation began.
And that was their main issue.
NARRATOR: We also read that
"In the preface of the Douay,
Roman Catholics contended
that the Latin Vulgate was
translated from the
Hebrew and Greek texts
when they were more pure.
Therefore, many contended
that the Vulgate version
was dictated by the Holy
Spirit, was consequently
of divine authority, and
more to be regarded than even
the original Hebrew
and Greek texts."
Hence, the Jesuit
scholars at Reims
concluded that the Latin
Vulgate is not only better
than all other
Latin translations
but than the Greek
text itself in those
places where they disagree.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So
against Sola Scriptura were
operating on two fronts.
The first part was to discredit
the Greek and the Hebrew
manuscripts as being so full
of corruptions and errors
that they could not be trusted,
thus proving that the Latin
Vogate alone is
the superior text.
And step two, to argue
that because the Bible is
so difficult to interpret, it
is necessary to rely on church
tradition and the infallible
teachings of the pope.
So this is the
academic environment
that had developed for
several hundred years
before Tischendorf
shows up in 1844.
Now, Tischendorf had embraced
the rescention theory,
this idea that the Bible was
lost and needed to be found.
Then you add to that, you
had Catholic scholars,
like Cardinal
Wiseman, who argued
that the truest
representation of the Bible
would be found in
the Latin Vulgate.
And all of these elements came
together in the 19th century
and this is what
inspired Tischendorf
to take his famous journey.
NARRATOR: Tischendorf's
efforts were clearly
aimed against the
traditional Greek text.
In 1866, he would write that "We
have at last hit upon a better
plan which is to set aside this
Textus Receptus altogether,
and to construct a fresh text."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The curious
thing about that quote
is that when
Tischendorf says, we
have hit upon a better plan,
who does he mean by we?
It sounds as though he was
working with somebody else
but he doesn't exactly say who.
NARRATOR: For years
prior to his journey,
Tischendorf had been influenced
by a prominent Catholic scholar
named Nicholas Cardinal Wiseman.
Cardinal Weisman
developed a theory
that old Latin texts had been
developed in North Africa
by the second century.
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Wiseman's assertion
seems to have been an attempt
to try and prove that the Latin
Vulgate was closer to
the original manuscripts
than any known Greek
manuscript at that time.
And it was this theory
that made Tischendorf
partial to the Latin Vulgate.
NARRATOR: We read that,
"In 1842, while in Paris,
Tischendorf prepared an
edition of the New Testament,
intended for the
use of Catholics,
giving the Latin
Vulgate in a Greek text.
Rendered as far as
possible conformable
to it, in parallel columns."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
So what Tischendorf
did is he developed a
Greek manuscript that
would conform to
the Latin Vulgate.
He essentially reversed the
work of Erasmus of Rotterdam
from 300 years earlier.
Remember, Erasmus had
collated the Greek manuscripts
and then published the
first ever parallel Bible,
with the Greek in one column
and the Latin in the other.
And he used the Greek to
correct the errors in the Latin.
Well, now, hundreds
of years later,
Tischendorf reverses
the process.
He does a parallel Bible,
but he does it the other way.
He uses the Latin to
correct the Greek.
And he did this work for
the Catholic archbishop
of Paris, Archbishop Affre.
And so it shows his
relationship with the Catholic
Church at this time.
It's also worth mentioning that
one of Tischendorf's critics
said that Tischendorf only
understood Greek through Latin.
NARRATOR: Tischendorf would
make his great discovery in 1844
when he arrived at St.
Catherine's Monastery,
at the base of what is
called Mount Sinai in Egypt.
But before he arrived,
he took a journey to Rome
and was received at the Vatican.
In his memoirs, Tischendorf
wrote, "I here pass over
in silence, the interesting
details of my travels.
My audience with the Pope,
Gregory XVI, in May, 1843.
my intercourse with
Cardinal Mezzofanti,
that surprising and
celebrated linguist."
Mezzofanti was famous
for his ability
to speak more than 50
languages fluently.
Tischendorf wrote that,
"Mezzofanti honored me
with some Greek verses
composed in my praise."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Tischendorf was well
favored by Rome, which
is odd considering
his status as a
Protestant scholar.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: I can
never quite figure that out.
Why a Protestant
scholar, or one who
claimed to be a
Protestant scholar,
would be meeting with the
pope over the situation.
There's a lot of
unanswered questions.
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
goes to meet in a private
audience with the pope.
It's like going to meet the
president, or a prime minister,
or someone of that position.
And then we have this famous
Catholic cardinal, Mezzofanti,
writing him a poem in
Greek to praise him
as this great scholar and so on.
It's all very strange.
But Tischendorf was
welcomed into Rome
by some of the leading Catholic
authorities at that time.
In fact, in his
memoirs, he reveals
that it was Archbishop
Affre of Paris for whom he
had prepared the parallel Bible.
That gave him his
recommendation to the Vatican.
And then he was received
by Pope Gregory.
NARRATOR: Tischendorf
wrote, "Gregory XVI,
after a prolonged
audience granted to me
took an ardent interest
in my undertaking."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Pope Gregory's
interest in Tischendorf
is curious.
Especially when you consider
that it was the same Pope
Gregory that openly condemned
the Protestant Bible
societies of that time.
NARRATOR: In 1843, American
author John Dowling,
wrote that "The present
Pope, Gregory XVI,
and his predecessor
Pope Leo XII,
denounced all Bible societies
declaring that by the Bible's
they distributed they
converted the Gospel of Christ
into a human gospel.
Or, what is still worse,
the gospel of the devil."
In his encyclical against
the Bible societies,
Pope Gregory wrote "We
have taken great pains
to remind the faithful of
the ancient laws concerning
vernacular translations
of the scriptures."
The pope's wording is suspicious
because it was the ancient laws
of the Roman church that
had Bible believers burned
at the stake for reading or
handling the word of God.
But could this have
been what Pope Gregory
was referring to in his writing?
Several years after
Tischendorf's private audience
at the Vatican, it was
discovered that the Inquisition
had continued underground
in the ancient city.
Charles Spurgeon,
known to millions
as the prince of preachers,
documented the manner
of torture that
had been reported
once the papal
dungeons were revealed.
From Spurgeon's publication,
The Sword and the Trowel,
we read that "They invented
ovens, or furnaces, which being
made red-hot, they lowered
the condemned into them,
bound hand and foot,
and immediately
closed over them the
mouth of the furnace.
This barbarous punishment and
was substituted for the burning
pile and in 1849,
these furnaces at Rome
were laid open to
the public view
in the dungeons of the
Holy Roman Inquisition,
near the great church
of the Vatican,
still containing
the calcined bones."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: What's
disturbing is that these things
were revealed in 1849, just
six years after Tischendorf
visited the pope.
And it was only revealed because
the great general, Garibaldi,
and his revolutionaries,
captured Rome that year
and opened the papal dungeons.
But then you have a
quote from W.C. Brownlee
that was published in 1843,
the same year Tischendorf
was at the Vatican.
And Brownlee says,
"The Inquisition--
the infernal
inquisition," he says,
"even at this day is in
full operation in Rome
under the patronage of
Pope Gregory Sixteenth."
The same pope that Constantin
von Tischendorf met with.
So while Tischendorf was in Rome
with his cardinal writing him
poetry to praise
him and so on, there
were people-- some of them
quite probably Christians--
who were still being
tortured for heresy
in the underground
inquisition nearby.
And they were being roasted
alive in these ovens
right next door to the Vatican.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Yes, the inquisition--
actually not just in Italy
but in other places--
went well into the 1800's.
NARRATOR: Discoveries of the
Inquisition during this era
were also exposed by
Doctor H. Grattan Guinness,
in the convent of Santo
Domingo, Mexico in 1861.
He published these photographs
of the remains of victims who
had been walled up
and buried alive.
The expressions of
their torment still
recorded in their countenance.
Charles Spurgeon wrote
that "The Inquisition
was the masterpiece of
infernal craft and malice.
There is a deep and indelible
sentence of damnation written
upon the apostate church for its
more than infernal cruelties.
And the curse is
registered in heaven.
Nor can any pretenses
to present liberality
reverse the condemnation.
Its infmay is engraven
in the rock forever."
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Rome did many,
many, many evil
and hateful things.
NARRATOR: Yet somehow,
during this era,
the Protestant Tischendorf
was not only accepted by Rome
but received special
treatment from the Vatican
and her priests.
Tischendorf's cooperation
with the Vatican
was a dramatic departure from
the resistance maintained
by other Protestant
ministers of that era.
Grattan Guinness called Rome
the masterpiece of Satan
and maintained that she had
never repented of her crimes.
In 1873, Charles Spurgeon wrote
that "The superstition of Rome
is the worst of all the evils
which have befallen our race.
May the Lord arise and
sweep it down to the hell
from whence it arose."
Spurgeon was so convicted
against the papacy that he once
declared "Popery is
abhorred of the Lord,
and they who help it wear
the mark of the Beast."
Yet in Rome, Tishcendorf was
not only welcomed by the pope,
but by two of the leading
cardinals at that time.
The first was the well known
linguistic, Mezzofanti,
while the other was a Jesuit
named Cardinal Angelo Mai.
During the 19th century, Mai
was the cardinal librarian
for the Vatican library and
was credited with recovering
many ancient manuscripts that
pertain to church history.
It was said that "There
is not a single century
of the Christian era, from
the second to the seventeenth,
from which he has not
produced important
and previously unknown works.
He had transcribed all with his
own hand entirely by himself."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: This quote
about be Jesuit Cardinal Mai
is very interesting
because it shows
us the nature of the times.
And so you've got
Cardinal Mai there,
who very much like Tischendorf--
Tischendorf is out journeying,
trying to gather all of
these ancient manuscripts--
at the same time,
Cardinal Mai is going
through old Vatican records
and he's producing all
of these works that nobody
had ever seen before,
that have to do with the
history of the Church.
Now what's disturbing
about this,
is that the collective
efforts of both Cardinal
Mai and Tischendorf would
end up dramatically changing
the academic world's view of the
Bible from that time forward.
During the same time that
Tischendorf was discovering
the first manuscript that would
change everyone's perception
about the Greek
text, Cardinal Mai
was in Rome working on
the other manuscript that
would accomplish the same thing.
And that was the Vatican's
version of the Bible,
a codex vaticanus, which today
is considered supreme over
all of the other Greek
biblical manuscripts
anywhere in the world.
VOICE OFFSCREEN: What we have
here is the Vatican manuscript,
also called Codex
B. I have it opened
to a very important section.
And you can see the
Vatican's seal here,
this is an exact facsimile.
NARRATOR: But before
Vaticanus would emerge
to dominate the world
of Biblical scholarship
the travels of Constantine
von Tischendorf
would yield the fruits
of his great ambition.
In his memoirs, he wrote
"It was in April, 1844
that I embarked at
Leghorn for Egypt.
The desire which I felt to
discover some precious remains
of any manuscripts, more
especially Biblical, of a date,
which would carry us back to
the early times of Christianity,
was realized beyond
my expectations.
It was at the foot
of Mount Sinai,
in the convent of
Saint Catherine
that I discovered the
pearl all my researches."
Tischendorf tells of how he
discovered this manuscript
in a trash basket
inside the convent.
The monks had been using its
pages as fuel for the fire.
He wrote "I perceived in
the middle of the great hall
a large and wide basket,
full of old parchments.
And the librarian told me that
two heaps of papers like this
had been already
committed to the flames.
What was my surprise to find
a mid this heap of papers,
a considerable number of sheets
of a copy of the Old Testament
in Greek, which
seemed to me to be one
of the most ancient
that I had ever seen."
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: He's
visiting the monastery in 1844.
And he is under the
patronage, sponsorship,
of Frederick Augustus,
kind of Saxony.
And while he's there, he
discovers an old manuscript
in a rubbish basket
and they were basically
using it as tinder
to start fires.
NARRATOR: According to his own
testimony, once he recogniz
the manuscript for
its ancient value,
Tischendorf responded
quickly and was
able to rescue many of the
pages from being burned.
He wrote "The authorities of the
convent allowed me to possess
myself of a third
of these parchments
as they were destined
for the fire.
But I could not
get them to yield
up possession of the remainder.
The too lively satisfaction
which I had displayed,
had arroused their
suspicions as to the value
of this manuscript."
In total, Tischendorf
recovered some 43 pages.
When he returned
from his journey,
he chose to publish the
pages, but secretly.
He wrote "I did not divulge
the name of the place
where I had found it in
the hopes of returning
and recovering the rest
of the manuscript."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So Tischendorf
published his Old Testament
portion of the Sinai
Codex, but he continued
to believe that
the New Testament
portion of the manuscript
was probably still
somewhere inside St.
Catharine's monastery.
Then he says he
returned again in 1853
and didn't find anything.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: So he
finally goes back in 1859.
He's able to get,
well, the remainder.
NARRATOR: It was during
Tischendorf's third journey
to St. Catharine's
monastery in 1859
that he made his most
famous discovery.
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Tischendorf says
that he was taking a walk
with a Steward of the convent
and that they returned to
his room at some point.
They were talking
about the Septuagint
and he says I, too,
have read a Septuagint,
meaning a Greek version
of the Old Testament.
So then he pulls out this bulky
manuscript, that was supposedly
wrapped in red cloth, and
shows it to Tischendorf.
NARRATOR: Tischendorf wrote,
"I unrolled the cover,
and discovered to my
great surprise not only
those very fragments
which, 15 years before,
I had taken out of
the basket, but also,
other parts of the Old Testament
and the New Testament complete.
I knew that I held
in my hand the most
precious Biblical
treasure in existence.
A document, whose
age and importance
exceeded that of all the
manuscripts which I had ever
examined during 20 years
of study on the subject."
Tischendorf would
transcribe and eventually
publish the manuscript under
the name Codex Sinaiticus.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: In
relationship to the Sinaiticus
manuscript, it's republished
by Kirsa Blake in the 1800's.
In the Old Testament portion
you can see what appears to be,
even, burn marks on some of
the leaves that were recovered.
VOICE OFFSCREEN:
like he pulled that right
out of the fire, doesn't it?
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Yeah, it does.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Yeah, it does.
See?
See?
VOICE OFFSCREEN: So this
certainly confirms his story,
or it seems to.
That they were throwing
these pages into the flames.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Well they were using it
like we use newspaper
to start a fire.
This was old, it
was brittle, so it
made good to start a fire
there in the cool mornings
and evenings at the monastery.
[APPLAUSE]
[LAUGHTER]
-I'm very thankful,
and grateful,
for this wonderful privilege.
NARRATOR: Once Sinaiticus
was fully published,
Tischendorf became a
world famous scholar,
practically overnight.
Nearly all the courts of
Europe showered honors
and distinctions on him
for his great discovery.
So much so, said his
son-in-law, that they
could not all fit
on one man's chest.
Oxford and Cambridge
universities
honored him with
their highest degrees.
In the midst of all this,
a copy of Sinaiticus
was sent to the pope
who wrote Tischendorf
an autographed letter
congratulating him.
Tischendorf even
mentioned how an old man
of distinguished learning
had said "I would rather
have discovered this Sinaitic
manuscript than the Koh i noor
of the Queen of England."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The Koh i noor
was the famed diamond of India
that was in possession
of the English throne.
And it's interesting
because that's
exactly how Tischendorf
described his manuscript.
As a diamond, he says,
in his possession.
And for him, it was.
NARRATOR: Because of
the Codex Sinaiticus,
Constantin von
Tischendorf would go on
to become one of the most famous
men of the academic world,
and perhaps the most celebrated
palaeographer of all time.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: And it's
an interesting contrast.
On the one hand, you've
got the reformers,
who are being persecuted and
killed by the Church of Rome
because of their faith
in the word of God.
Well on the other hand,
you've got Tischendorf, who's
being lauded by the pope
and celebrated like a prince
upon the earth
for his discovery.
NARRATOR: In the
the scripture says, concerning
the Great Harlot Mystery,
Babylon, that "By thy sorceries
were all nations deceived."
As part of their
Counter Reformation,
the Jesuits created
many fraudulent
and forged documents.
When they could not persuade
others by ordinary means
they would literally
create historic evidence
to support their claims.
Sometimes they dug up
old bones, pretending
that they belonged
to some saint.
And sometimes they
created fake documents.
19th century British
historian, Thomas Carlyle,
said that "Jesuitism
has poisoned
the wellsprings of truth
in the whole world."
Yet long before the
Jesuit order was formed,
Rome herself had
an ancient practice
of fraud and deception.
VOICE OFFSCREEN:
What was the purpose
of creating all these forgeries?
DR. HENRY HUDSON: Well, I
think it was enabling the pope,
the claims-- the papal claims--
to having absolute power.
Anything that could
buttress those claims.
And that's why they came in.
NARRATOR: Perhaps the
most famous forgery
in Rome's long history was
the donation of Constantine,
a document alleging that the
emperor Constantine the Great
gave all the lands of
the Western Roman Empire
to the pope as the
vicar of the Son of God.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: The donation
of Constantine, according
to Renaissance scholars who
first began to expose some
of these documents-- Lawrence
Lavallo for example--
tells us that that
document could not have
been written in
the fourth century.
NARRATOR: Today it is agreed
by Catholic and Protestant
scholars alike that the
donation was a forgery.
Most likely created between the
eighth and ninth century AD.
Developed alongside the
donation, where the Decretals
of Isidore, also known
as the False Decretals.
This elaborate forgery
involved a series of letters
from early figures
in Church history.
From Clement, in
the first century,
to Gregory the Great in the
sixth and seventh century.
The letters filled
more than 700 pages
and were cleverly interwoven
with real historic documents
to give them credibility.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The diabolical
genius of the False Decretals
is that it was truth
mixed with lies.
And it was very
elaborately done.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: If you're
going to the 11th century
when you have Gratian and his
compilation of the cannons,
you'll discover that in
support of papal power,
out of something
like 330 quotations,
313 of those
sources of authority
come from those false,
distorted documents.
DR. RONALD COOKE: The
Jesuits held them back,
but they finally came to view
that many of these documents
were forgeries and
they were forged
specifically to give Rome power.
And so that they would be
looked upon as the true Church
and as the seat of the
papacy and that this
was what the church
had written about
and what the church
supported when
in fact they were all forged.
NARRATOR: The
Decretals of Isidore
became the cornerstone of canon
law during the Middle Ages.
They would be used to deceive
the church for more than 600
years until they were
finally exposed by Calvinous
scholar, David Blondell in 1628.
But the false Decretals and
the donation of Constantine
are said to be just two of the
countless forgeries created
by Rome.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: They're
all basically the same.
They're the same as the Dictatus
Papae of Gregory VII, in which
they are claims made
about papl power.
NARRATOR: Pope Gregory
VII was perhaps
the most notorious
forger ever admitted
to by Catholic historians.
In the 11th century, he
drafted his Dictatus,
or list, of papal privileges.
Among his 27 points, he
declared the following.
"The pope can be judged
by no one on earth.
The Roman church
has never erred,
nor can it err, until
the end of time.
The pope alone can dethrone
emperors and kings,
and absolve their
subjects from allegiance."
And, "All princes are
obliged to kiss his feet."
To support these
ideas, Gregory relied
upon the forged
documents of the past,
but chose to go even farther
and create his own history
for the church and the world.
In the book Vicars of Christ,
former Jesuit priest Peter de
Rosa writes of Pope Gregory
VII and his school of forgers.
He says, "For seven
centuries, the Greeks
had called Rome the
home of forgeries.
Whenever they tried
talking with Rome,
the popes brought
out forged documents
which the Greeks,
naturally, had never seen."
De Rosa says "Gregory went
way beyond the Donation
of Constantine.
He had a whole school of forgers
under his very nose turning out
document after document, with
the papal seal of approval
to cater for his every need.
"Pope Gregory might
require justification
for some action against
a prince or bishop.
Very well, these
prelates literally
produced the
appropriate document.
No need for research, it was
all done on the premises.
Many earlier documents
were touched up,
to make them say the opposite
of what they said originally.
Some of these earlier documents
were themselves forgeries.
This instant method
of inventing history
was marvelously successful,
especially as the forgeries
were at once inserted
into canon law.
Thus was accomplished
the quietest and longest
lasting of all revolutions.
It was all done on paper.
DR. RONALD COOKE: They
propagated deceptions early on.
And I believe those
deceptions continue
right up into the 20th century.
NARRATOR: Evidence that
Rome continued her forgeries
into modern times
can be shown in
the late 19th and
early 20th centuries.
In 1873, Charles
Spurgeon documented
how the relic department
of the Vatican
had been exposed for
manufacturing false relics
and presenting them as the
bones of various saints of old.
We read that "so far back as
1828, this trade was going on.
With pieces of bones of sheep,
and hares, or of human bones
taken from the
catacombs, but such as
were probably those of pagans.
Certainly not of
saints and martyrs,
whose names they
affixed to them."
Spurgeon went on to say
that "The Jesuits play
a prominent part in
these transactions,
as they do in most
Catholic affairs."
Then, in the 20th century, it
appears that Jesuit deception
played a role in
the 1912 discovery
of the Piltdown Man, which
was declared to be the missing
link that would prove
Darwin's Theory of Evolution.
But 40 years after
its discovery,
Piltdown was proven
to be a hoax.
The chief culprit
in the deception
was said to be Charles
Dawson, an amateur British
archaeologist who
sought fame and glory.
Yet Dawson did not work alone.
His helper was a Jesuit priest
named Teilhard de Chardin.
In 1980, Harvard Professor
Stephen Jay Gould
would publish his belief
that Teilhard himself was
a co-conspirator
with Dawson, who
helped him create
the Piltdown hoax.
Yet another Jesuit trained
priest, named George Lemaitre,
would further these
ideas and develop
the Big Bang theory in 1931.
It might be said that no
doctrine has been more
devastating to
faith in the Bible
than Darwin's
Theory of Evolution.
But was it only coincidence
that Charles Darwin himself
published Origin of the
Species in 1859, the same year
that Tischendorf discovered
Codex Sinaiticus?
Just as La Peyrere's theory
about men before Adam
worked together with Richard
Simon's historic criticism,
so Darwin's theory of evolution
would work alongside Codex
Sinaiticus to destroy the
faith of countless millions
in the scripture as the inspired
and inerrant word of God.
It's important to consider that
from the period of 1828 to 1912
it can be shown that the
Vatican and her Jesuit priests
were involved in
fakery and forgery.
This is significant because
this time frame includes
the same period that Tischendorf
was working with Rome.
After Tischendorf revealed
his Codex Sinaiticus
he was hailed as a great
scholar and greeted
with laudation across Europe.
-(LAUGHING) Oh,
cheers my good friend.
NARRATOR: But shortly after
the work was published
it was challenged by a
prominent expert in paleography.
His name was
Constantine Simonides.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Constantine
Simonides is undoubtedly
the forgotten link in the
history of Codex Sinaiticus.
And it's because he waged
an open and a public debate
against Tischendorf
for about four years,
arguing that Codex Sinaiticus
was not an ancient manuscript.
And the more you
study Simonides you
realize that he was a very
important figure at that time.
NARRATOR: Alexander
Von Humboldt declared
that Simonides was an enigma.
Others believed
his understanding
of ancient languages
to be ingenious.
A 19th century
publication said of him
"Dr. Simonides is
a Greek by birth
and he speaks and writes
the classic language
of his forefathers with
fluency, purity, and elegance."
From his uncle, "Simonides
thoroughly acquired
the art of paleography and
became so great a proficient
therein that few surpass him
either in the practice of it,
or in the diagnosis
of manuscripts."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Simonides had quite
a reputation in
the 19th century.
On the one hand, he was
a respected paleographer.
But on the other hand, he had
kind of a cloak and dagger
history and was looked upon as
sort of a Greek Indiana Jones.
Involved not only with
ancient manuscripts
but also fighting battles
as a Greek patriot
against the Ottoman
Turkish empire.
Which is an important part
of understanding who he was.
-Come, my brother, we shall
avenge the blood of our fathers
on this Turkish invader.
Let us be strong in our
weakness and with God's help,
we shall prevail.
[CHEERING CROWD]
[GUN SHOT]
NARRATOR: One of the
newspapers of the time
reported that "the
escapades of Mr. Simonides
extend over nearly 20 years.
In Alexandria, he contrived
to quarrel with some Arabs.
Pistolled two of them,
received some ugly wounds
on the head and
face from a third.
In Macedonia, his
native country,
he succeeded in getting
up a little insurrection
among his countrymen,
who joined him
in the leadership of
the patriot bands.
He fell on a detachment
of Turkish soldiers,
drove them into a river, and
destroyed some 150 of them."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
These are the kinds
of stories recorded
about Simonides.
As a Greek patriot who was
still fighting against the Turks
in a conflict that dated
all the way back to the fall
of Constantinople in
1453, when the Turks
invaded the ancient capital
of the Greek Orthodox empire.
In the 19th century, the Greeks
remembered Constantinople
as if it had just
happened the day before.
-Constantinople
will be ours again.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Simonides
was apparently involved
in continued battles
with the Turks
and controversies against the
Latinizers, or Roman Catholics,
as he called them.
Because both the Turks
and the Catholic Church
had fought against the
Greek Orthodox kingdom.
And so, for Sinonides, the
Turks and the Catholics
were both ancient enemies.
And this conflict with
Rome in particular
would have everything to
do with his controversy
against Tischendorf.
And then as a scholar,
Simonides was equally
in the thick of debates
about ancient manuscripts.
He had presented his
work before kings,
nobles, foreign
ministers, diplomats.
He'd sold a number
of manuscripts
to the British Museum, and
other prominent institutions
in Europe.
So he was involved
in the highest levels
of the academic
world at that time.
NARRATOR: Simonides owned a
collection of more than 5,000
ancient manuscripts
that he had partly
inherited from his uncle.
As he traveled across Europe
he presented these works
at libraries and universities.
Their content often
sparked intense debate.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Simonides'
debates usually centered
around the understanding
of ancient languages.
And he generally believed
that his own knowledge
was superior to
those around him,
although he did not have a
reputation for arrogance.
But while he was in Germany,
he got into a vicious conflict
with the scholars at the
University of Leipzig.
And it was there in
1855 that he made
enemies with Von Tischendorf.
So now, years later, when he
comes forward and questions
Codex Sinaiticus,
he does so as
Tischendorf's old nemesis.
NARRATOR: Simonides claimed
that Codex Sinaiticus was
no ancient manuscript at all,
but a modern work created
by himself and two
other Greeks in 1840.
-[LAUGHTER]
NARRATOR: While Tischendorf
was in the midst of enjoying
his fame, the story
of Simonides began
to be published in
the London newspapers.
-Simonides.
NARRATOR: Needless to say,
Tischendorf was furious.
-Idiot.
NARRATOR: What followed
would be a public debate that
would continue in
a variety of London
newspapers for the
next two years.
In July of 1861, a publication
called the Literary Gazette
reported that "We understand
that in literary circles,
a rumor prevails that the
manuscript now publishing
by the Russian government,
under the direction of M.
Tischendorf, purporting
to be a manuscript
Bible of the fourth century
is not an ancient manuscript
but is an entirely modern
production, written
by a gentleman now alive, who
will shortly take measures
to establish his claim
to the authorship.
The manuscript is known
as the Codex Sinaiticus,
and has attracted a large amount
of attention throughout Europe.
Should the rumor prove to be
correct, as we believe it will,
the disclosures
that will follow,
must be of the greatest
interest to archaeology."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: In
his letters, Simonides
says that the controversy
began over Codex Sinaiticus
when he first saw the
manuscript in Liverpool in 1860.
And then it was
the following year
that the newspapers
got hold of the story.
So this story first
appears in 1861.
But Simonides did not
publish his side of the story
until 1862.
The only reason he did so
is because he was drawn
in to the conflict by two
of the prominent scholars
at that time.
NARRATOR: The two
scholars in question
were Samuel P. Tregelles,
and Fenton John Anthony Hort.
Fragellis and Hort believed
Sinaiticus to be real
and took sides against
Simonides almost immediately.
Fragellis wrote that
"the story of Simonides
was as false and
absurd as possible."
In response, Simonides defended
his argument, as published
in The Guardian newspaper,
in September of 1862.
Where he said "When
about two years ago, I
saw the first facsimiles of
Tischendorf, which were put
into my hand at Liverpool by
Mr. Newton, a friend of Dr.
Tregelles.
I at once recognized
my own work,
as I immediately told him."
In the book Codex Sinaiticus
and the Simonides Affair,
author JK Elliot confirms
that Simonides spoke
of his authorship to a man
named JE Hodgkin in 1860,
and in a letter to Sir Thomas
Phillips on August 2, 1861.
Simonides claimed that the
manuscript had not been created
with any intention to deceive
but was intended by himself
and his uncle as a gift to Czar
Nicholas the First of Russia.
To prove his claims,
Simonides challenged
Tischendorf to a public debate.
Yet Tischendorf
refused to take part.
About this, Simonides wrote "The
real test of the genuineness
of the Codex Sinaiticus
is neglected.
The public were assured
that in May, Tischendorf
was to be in London,
armed with a portion
at least of his great codex.
I have waited in England,
hoping to have the opportunity
of meeting him, face to
face, to prove him in error.
But May has come and gone, and
the discover has not appeared.
Let the favourers of the
antiquity of the manuscript
persuade him to come at
once, and brave the ordeal,
or else forever hold his peace."
Yet despite the
evasiveness of Tischendorf,
most of the
newspapers in England
defended him and denounced
Simonides as a fraud.
The attacks were
almost fanatical
and often unreasonable.
Could Tischendorf's
relationship with Rome
have had something
to do with it?
During this same era,
Protestant historian JA Wiley
wrote about the Jesuit's
influence in English media.
In his book on the Jesuit's
morals, maxims, and plots,
he said that "There are two
institutions in especial
to which the Jesuits
will lay siege.
These are the press
and the pulpit.
The press of Great Britain is
already manipulated by them
to an extent of which the
public but little dream.
The whole English press of
the world is supervised,
and the word is passed
round how writers, speakers,
and causes are to be handled.
And applause for
condemnation dealt out
just as it may accord with the
interests and wishes of Rome."
Yet Simonides was not
without his supporters.
Another paper, called
The Literary Churchman,
questioned the antiquity
of Codex Sinaiticus
and argued that Simonides
should be heard.
They said, "For
ourselves, we must
profess entire impartiality.
Though we were quite ready
from the first to admit
the importance of the discovery
of Tischendorf we are not
prepared, at this moment, to
say, with the Dr. Tregelles,
that the statements of Simonides
are 'as false and absurd
as possible.' Tischendorf
applies these terms,
false and absurd, just
now to Tregelles himself."
The reason Tischendorf attacked
Tregelles was because he
disagreed with him about the
writing of Codex Sinaiticus.
Tregelles said, "On one
point, I believe that I differ
materially from Tischendorf,
as to the writing
of the manuscript.
He thinks that he sees
traces of various hands
having been employed in such
a way that a change of writer
must have frequently
taken place.
I believe that the difference is
to be attributed to the scribe
having more or less
ink in his style,
the ink being more
or less thick,
and the surface of the
vellum slightly varying."
In other words, the scribe dips
his stylus into an ink well.
And when he first
begins to write,
there's a lot of ink on it.
But sooner or later
the ink runs thin.
In places where
the ink ran thin,
Tischendorf believed that this
signified a change of writers,
and hence the passage of time.
Tregelles, on the
other hand, believed
that it was the
same scribe, it's
just that he sometimes
ran low on ink.
That was the difference.
But when you factor in that
Tischendorf spreads his scribes
and correctors from the
fourth century all the way
to the seventh century,
a span of some 300 years,
you're left wondering
just how precise
the scientific methods
were that they employed.
Also, consider that
similar contentions
are made about
ancient bones that
are dug up out of the ground.
Where the scientists
tell us that these
are millions of years
old and so forth.
Do they really have the
ability to date bones that way?
And did Tischendorf
really have the ability
to date ancient manuscripts?
After the initial attacks
against him began,
Simonides asserted that
these scholars, in reality,
knew little or nothing
about ancient manuscripts.
In response to one
of his critics,
he wrote, "Neither
you nor Tischendorf
possess the true knowledge
of paleographical science.
You have only learned to say
at random this is genuine,
and this is spurious.
But you do not know the reason."
This comment might be brushed
aside but for the often
repeated testimony
that Simonides exceeded
his contemporaries
in the expertise
of manuscript evidence.
James Farrer, in his 1907
book on literary forgeries
wrote that "Tischendorf was
only the senior of Simonides
by five years and in the
science of paleography
had neither his knowledge
nor his experience."
Another scholar, whose
testimony was chiefly regarded,
was Henry Bradshaw,
keeper of manuscripts
at the Cambridge
University library.
Bradshaw sided with Tischendorf.
And once this was
known, he was confronted
in person by Simonides.
In a letter describing the
encounter, Bradshaw wrote,
"Dr. Simonides wrote to me,
to convince me and my friends
that it was quite
possible for him
to have written the
volume in question.
He had invited some of
us to Christ's College
to discuss matters fairly.
He could speak and understand
English pretty well
but his friend was with him
to interpret and explain.
They really seemed to believe
that all people in the West
were is ignorant of Greek
as the Greeks are of Latin.
But the great question was,
how do you satisfy yourselves
of the genuineness
of any manuscript?
I first replied that it was
really difficult to define.
That it seemed to be more a kind
of instinct than anything else.
Dr. Simonides and his
friend readily caught
at this as too much
like vague assertion
and they naturally
ridiculed any such idea.
But I further said
that I had lived
for six years past in the
constant, almost daily
habit of examining manuscripts."
Bradshaw then applied
this principle
to his opinion of
Codex Sinaiticus.
When Simonides
objected, Bradshaw said,
"I told him, as
politely as I could,
that I was not to be
convinced against the evidence
of my senses."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So Bradshaw
essentially admitted
that there was no
real scientific proof
as to the age of
Codex Sinaiticus.
And he ultimately admitted
that all he trusted in
were his senses,
or his instincts,
about the manuscript.
And Bradshaw is very significant
because it was his reputation
as a scholar that
really compelled
people to embrace
Tischendorf's Codex.
NARRATOR: Bradshaw
further said that "Dr.
Simonides always
maintained that Mt.
Athos Bible, meaning Codex
Sinaiticus, written in 1840
for the emperor of Russia was
not meant to deceive anyone.
That it was professor
Tischendorf's ignorance
and inexperience which
rendered him so easily
deceived where no
deception was intended."
Mount Athos was the
location where Simonides
claimed he had
created the Codex.
He provided many details for how
the manuscript had been written
and how it came to
be at Mount Sinai.
He also provided many names of
those in the Greek world, who
he said could confirm that
he created the manuscript.
But strangely, most
of these details
were never investigated
either by the supporters
of Tischendorf or by the
newspapers of the time.
In 1907, James Farrer wrote that
the controversy "cannot be said
to have been settled by the mere
opinions Tregelles or Bradshaw,
who examined the codex two
months before Simonides had
made his claim to
it as his work,
so that they had no reason to
examine it with suspicion."
But could there have
been some other motive
that drove the critical
scholars at this time?
Simonides was a real threat
to the academic establishment
of Western Europe.
If what he claimed was
true, it would have shown
that Tregelles, Bradshaw,
Hort, and Tischendorf
knew little or nothing
about dating ancient texts.
So you can imagine how hard
they fought to discredit him.
Not only that, but Simonides
was working at the time
with a man named
Joseph Mayer, who
was the founder of the
Maery Museum in Liverpool.
And while there, Mr. Mayer had
him come and examine a series
of ancient Egyptian scrolls that
he had purchased years before.
So Mr. Mayer brings
Simonides to the museum
and what he uncovered were
first century fragments
and parchments that shattered
some of the claims that were
being made by the
higher critics.
He found a first
century fragment
of the Gospel of
Matthew that was dated
within 15 years of the
ascension of Christ.
And this proved that Matthew
was the first gospel, not Mark,
and that it was originally
written in Greek, not in Hebrew
or Aramaic as the
critics had speculated.
Also, he displayed a
first century scroll
that contained 1 John 5:7,
the Johannine Comma, which
is a hotly disputed verse
among higher critics.
And this proved
that they were wrong
and that the verse was not
invented in later centuries,
as they had been saying.
And this was on display
at Cambridge University
and then at the Royal
Society in London.
And if you read the
accounts, these things
were so controversial that
some later historians tried
to claim that Simonides had
sold this scroll of the Gospel
of Matthew to Mr. Mayer as some
kind of forgery or something.
But if you read the newspaper
accounts, it's very clear.
Mr. Mayer acknowledged
that, in fact, he
had purchased the
scroll years before he
ever met Constantine Simonides.
So there was a lot of propaganda
and false accusation that
came against Simonides because
these discoveries were so
threatening to what the
critics wanted to believe.
In December of 1862,
the London review
wrote that "The few
believers in Simonides
represented him as a man whose
towering genius had aroused
the envy, alike of Grecian
professors, German students,
and English librarians,
and banded them together
in a conspiracy to crush him."
In December of
1862, a publication
called The Brighton Observer
reported that "Professor
Tischendorf having visited the
Holy Land, returned to Europe
with a voluminous
manuscript that he obtained
from the library of the
monastery of Mount Sinai.
The earliest known
copy of the Bible.
In time one of the parts fell
into the hands of Simonides,
who at once recognized
it as a manuscript
he had himself executed.
He made his assertion
public that the Codex
Sinaiticus had been
written by himself.
But Tischendorf and the
learned men of Germany
refused to recognize
the claims of Simonides
and continued its publication.
Things went on this way, some
persons believing Simonides,
some Tischendorf, when suddenly
a Greek Archimandrite wrote
to the English papers from
Alexandria, corroborating
the statement of Simonides."
And stating that he
remembered seeing Simonides
engaged in writing out
the copy of the Bible
in question in the ancient
Greek characters on Mount Athos.
The Greek monk
mentioned in the article
was a friend of Simonides
whose name was Kallinikos.
Kallinikos wrote a
series of letters
to the English
newspapers confirming
the story of Simonides and
denouncing Tischendorf, whom he
called "The master and pupil of
all guile, and all wickedness."
In one of his letters, published
in The Literary Churchmen,
Kallinikos wrote "I repeat
that the manuscript in dispute
is the work of the
unwearied Simonides,
and of no other person.
A portion of this was secretly
removed from Mount Sinai,
by Professor
Tischendorf, in 1844.
The rest, with
inconceivable recklesness,
he mutilated and tampered
with, according to his liking,
in the year 1859.
Some leaves he
destroyed, especially
such as contained the
Acrostics of Simonides."
What's interesting is
Kallinikos' mentioned
of how Tischendorf
destroyed the pages that
had the markings of
Simonides on them.
Which may explain why some
of the pages were burned.
NARRATOR: It's important to
remember that to this day
the monks at Mount Sinai
deny Tischendorf's story
and his claim that he found the
manuscript in a rubbish basket.
So where would the burned
pages of the manuscript
have come from?
Is it possible that Tischendorf
burned parts of them
to destroy the
markings of Simonides
as Kallinikos suggests?
And this might
explain why he came up
with a story about
the monks throwing
the pages into
the fire later on.
A story which nobody
really seems to believe.
Kallinikos claimed
that he himself
had been at St.
Catharine's monastery
when Tischendorf was there
and that Tischendorf took the
first pages of the manuscript
without permission.
He said, "I further declare that
the Codex which Dr. Tischendorf
obtained is the identical codex
which Simonides wrote inasmuch
as I saw it in the
hands of Tischendorf
and recognized the work."
Kallinikos also claimed that
the manuscript had been washed
with lemon juice and herbs
to weaken the appearance
of the letters and to give
it a more ancient look.
In response to these accusations
the supporters of Tischendorf
insisted that Simonides had
forged the letters themselves,
and they claimed that Kallinikos
was a fictional character.
Yet in his book, James Ferrar
tells us that Kallinikos was
indeed a real person and that
his letters cannot be brushed
aside as the testimony
of a fabulous being.
Yet the letters of
Kallinikos bear within them
an almost prophetic
warning about the codex.
He wrote to the
newspapers in 1862
that "you will greatly sin
in foisting on the world
a new manuscript as an old one.
And especially a manuscript
containing the Holy Scriptures.
Injury to the church must
accrue from all this,
even from the evidently numerous
corrections of the manuscript.
Tischendorf
originally documented
some 14,800 corrections.
Today, the Codex
Sinaiticus has its home
at the British
Library in London.
In 2009, they finished the
Codex Sinaiticus Project
which was aimed
at fully examining
Tischendorf's famous manuscript.
In 2008, we interviewed
Doctor Juan Garces,
one of the curators
of the project,
while the work was
still in progress.
-Part of the Codex
Sinaiticus Project
is to gather all the material,
commission top scholars,
to go through that material
and provide reports.
To sit around a table and
discuss it and publish it all.
First of all the
documents, but also
the history.
The great historical
account of how
it came from St.
Catharine's monastery.
I think the great
role of this project
is to produce this
history, which hasn't been
written, as we all
agree, well enough.
So I hope in 2009, July, we will
be able to tell the full story.
INTERVIEWER (OFFSCREEN):
Is there any truth
to the assertion that
Von Tischendorf found
the first manuscript
in a trash barrell?
-He said in his book that
he found it in a basket.
But, again, this is
one of the many voices
that make the whole
of the history.
And I'm in no
position to confirm
that as being probable or not.
NARRATOR: While we were
suspicious of this answer when
we heard it, we chose to
wait until they finished
their research before
jumping to a conclusion.
Yet incredibly, once the
British Library published
their website, we found
that they omitted most all
of the documented history
about Codex Sinaiticus.
They ignored Tischendorf's
own testimony
about finding the manuscript
in a rubbish basket.
Instead, they claim
that the monks
brought it to his
attention in 1844.
And while they said they were
going to tell the full story,
their website makes no mention
of the four year controversy
with Constantine Simonides.
We also spoke with Doctor Scott
McKendrick, the head of Western
Manuscripts, about
the comparison
between Sinaiticus and
the Codex Vaticanus.
-They're different also
in one critical way,
in that Sinaiticus-- or two
ways, actually, I should say.
Two ways.
One is that Vaticanus does not
have the extent of correction.
That's a very
critical difference.
Sinaiticus is the most corrected
manuscript, Greek manuscript,
of the scriptures.
The second is that Vaticanus now
has a very strange appearance.
When you look at it,
as a manuscript expert,
although you know
that people tell you
that it's a fourth
century manuscript,
it actually looks like a
fifteenth century manuscript.
And there's one very
simple reason for that.
Is that, almost the entire
text has been overwritten
by a fifteenth century scribe.
Not only that, he's added in
fifteenth century decoration,
titling, and so forth.
So it has a very
strange appearance.
NARRATOR: Is it possible that
the reason Codex Vaticanus has
a strange and even
newer appearance
is that it may not be a
truly ancient manuscript?
The earliest recorded
date for Vaticanus
is 1475 AD, when it
was first entered
into the record of
the Vatican Library.
The manuscript had formerly
been rejected by Erasmus
and the reformers because
they believed it was corrupt.
Yet somehow, the warnings
of the Reformation
were completely
ignored by Tischendorf
and the scholars
who supported him.
They all embraced Vaticanus
without questioning
its authenticity
or considering that
it may have been
one of Rome's many
historic forgeries.
Among this company of
scholars was FHA Scrivener,
another prominent
academic who also
opposed Constantine Simonides.
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
The strange thing
about all of these guys,
Bradshaw, Scribner, Tregelles,
Hort, all of them who supported
Codex Vaticanus and who
questioned
Constantine Simonides.
It's understandable that
they would question Simonides
because he had been
accused of forgery.
That makes sense.
That they would take the time
to investigate his claims.
But why they did not apply the
same standard to the Vatican--
when the Vatican has a much
longer and much more provable
history of forgery
and fakery and fraud--
why they didn't apply the
same standard when they were
examining Codex Vaticanus
just doesn't make any sense.
And in fact if you study
what happened when Tregelles,
for example, when he goes
to the Vatican library
to examine Codex
Vaticanus, the priest there
behaved in a very
strange manner.
And he said while he
was looking at the Codex
there were priests in the room
and they were making noise
and so on to try
and distract him.
And he said that if he spent
too much time looking at any one
page, for too long
and studying it,
they would come to and it away.
Almost as though
they didn't want
him to have an opportunity
to study it too closely.
NARRATOR: Among the more
startling features of Vaticanus
are its many omissions.
-In the Gospels
alone it leaves out
237 words, 452 clauses
and 748 whole sentences.
And other manuscripts agree
that those things are there.
NARRATOR: While Vaticanus
is known for its omissions,
Sinaiticus is famous for it's
more than 14,000 corrections.
Many more than the
average biblical codex.
While Tischendorf reported
some 14,800 corrections,
once the British library's
project was complete,
the number was
inflated dramatically.
In this BBC documentary the
latest number of corrections
is given by Doctor McKendrick
along with the theological
conclusions they
are said to imply.
-On closer inspection, the
text of the Codex Sinaiticus
is littered with revisions.
It is history's most
altered Biblical manuscript
and within those changes lie
it's real theological secrets.
-It has approximately
23,000 corrections
in all that survives, which
is an extraordinary rate
of correction.
It means that on
average there are
about 30 corrections
on each page.
-Given the quality
of the calligraphy,
scholars was surprised
to find so many changes.
Many scribes wrote for money.
They wrote quickly, which meant
they sometimes made errors.
But 23,000 corrections can't
be explained in this way.
There have to be
theological reasons too.
If the Biblical
text could vary, it
couldn't be the
immutible word of God.
What the Codex
Sinaiticus was revealing
was the instability
of the story.
-This volume is the
oldest surviving copy
of the New Testament, complete.
This is the ancestor
of all the Bibles
that everybody else
has in the world.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So
right there notice
the conclusion that
the BBC is giving.
They're saying that if this
oldest Bible, supposedly,
had all these mistakes
and variance in it,
then that proves it
cannot be the immutable,
inerrant word of God, hence
confirming what the Jesuits,
and the Vatican, and all
the Catholic scholars,
and the higher critics had been
arguing for hundreds of years
in their attempts to
destroy the process
of doctrine of Sola Scriptura.
NARRATOR: This same BBC
documentary even goes on
to show how the influence
of Codex Sinaiticus
would specifically undermine
the Protestant faith
in the King James Bible.
-Here was a manuscript that
offered unique insights
into scripture and which made
scholars re-evaluate evaluate
the Bible that Victorian
Christians had relied on.
-The King James Bible, sturdy
and black on the shelves
was thought to be perfect
inerrant by many people
across the English
speaking world, which
was mostly Bible
believing Protestants.
But the fact of the matter
was that scholars had known
that the translations
were all based
on rather shaky
evidence, shaky texts.
So this is what drove Von
Tischendorf to go and search
across the ancient
Scriptorius, they were called.
DR. SCOT MCKENDRICK: When the
manuscript was first discovered
in 1844, this met exactly what
Tischendorf was looking for.
In other words, a very early
manuscript of the Christian
Bible.
And in particular, of course,
what he subsequently found
was the earliest
complete New Testament.
NARRATOR: But is Codex
Sinaiticus really
the earliest copy of
the New Testament?
Or is it a 19th
century work created
by Constantine Simonides?
A work that was somehow
tampered with and manipulated
to fulfill a
centuries old agenda?
After presenting many
names, dates, and places
to the scholars
of Western Europe,
Simonides himself seemed to
grow weary of the debates.
At one point he wrote "What
then have you to oppose
to the evidence of
living men, O zealous
defender of the
pseudo-Sinaitic Codex?
If you are still
incredulous, I say to you,
remain faithful in
your faithlessness.
I have proclaimed the truth,
for I will answer as I should
to the All-Seeing God
in the day of judgment.
Therefore, I have
spoken, I have no sin.
Wholly yours,
Constantine Simonides."
Simonides would publish
a final work in 1864
before leaving England for good.
In it, he reaffirmed his
claims about Sinaiticus
and included the testimonies
of those who believed him.
Yet and his enemies
in the press continued
to insist that he was
merely a liar and a forger.
The charge of forgery was
never proven against Simonides,
but can be traced to his initial
conflict with Tischendorf
at the University
of Leipzig in 1855
when Simonides presented
the first known copy
of the Shepherd of
Hermas in Greek.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The reason
the Shepherd of Hermas
is important is because
it's a work that
was embraced by
the early church.
But in Western Europe, it
was only known in Latin.
And yet scholars
knew that it had
originally been
written in Greek.
But nobody had ever
found a copy in Greek.
Constantine Simonides
was the first man
to bring a Greek copy of
the Shepherd of Hermas
into Western Europe.
And that's very important
because the Shepherd of Hermas
is also found as part
of Codex Sinaiticus.
And this supports
the idea that he
could have created
Codex Sinaiticus.
Why?
Because he had access to a Greek
copy of the Shepherd of Hermas.
And he's the only
person in the world who
had a copy of the Greek version
of the Shepherd of Hermas.
That's why it's so significant.
NARRATOR: While most of
the scholars at Leipzig
embraced the Hermas
manuscript as genuine,
Tischendorf declared it
to be a forgery because it
disagreed with
the Latin version.
In response, Simonides argued
that "the manuscript Herams was
correct and that common Latin
translations from which it
different had been
made not in accordance
with the Greek
originals but to suit
the views of the Latin
translators who had put
into the mouth of Hermas
doctrinal opinions
eminently calculated to
strengthen the position
of the Catholic Church to which
the translators belonged."
Simonides' biographer wrote that
"as some of the chief dogmas
of the Latin Church
were severely attacked
by an exposure of the fraud
in the Latin translations,
Simonides gained much
ill-will among the members
of that church."
-This cannot be right.
This is a forgery.
NARRATOR: The charge
of forgery would
be exaggerated in the
English press to the point
that Simonides would eventually
be accused of forging nearly
everything he came
in contact with.
He is said to have left
England about 1864.
But then in 1870,
a number of the men
who opposed him would become
involved in the new revision
committee for the
King James Bible.
The committee was led by Fenton
John Anthony Hort, the friend
of Tregelles who
was among the first
to embrace the Codex Sinaiticus.
Under his leadership,
the committee
would create a new Greek
text in fulfillment
of what Tischendorf
had written in 1866.
They used as their
foundation Codex
Vaticanus and the
Codex Sinaiticus.
-It was an entirely
new Greek text.
It was different from
anything that existed before.
NARRATOR: Hort seems
to have been motivated
by a hatred for the traditional
Greek of the Reformation.
He referred to it as villainous
and as "that vile Textus
Receptus."
His partner was an Anglican
bishop named BF Wescott.
Other committee members
included Tregelles,
along with FHA Scribener.
It is interesting to note that
the committee also invited John
Henry Newman, who was at
the time, a Catholic priest.
And while he declined the
offer, their invitation
reveals much about the
theological opinions
of Wescott and Hort.
DR. RONALD COOKE: You know,
there's definite links
to Roman Catholicism there
in the different Bibles.
Wescott and Hort, they were
definitely
Anglp-Catholics at best.
INTERVIEWER (OFFSCREEN):
So you would
call Wescott and
Hort Anglo-Catholics?
DR. RONALD COOKE:
Yeah, I would think
that you would have
to class them as that.
You have your whole
Tractarian movement
going on at that time
in the Anglican church.
And that was the Anglo-Catholic
movement by John Henry Newman,
who later became a cardinal
in the Roman Catholic Church.
But he was in the Anglican
church at that time and John
Keeble, and Stride, and
many of the other writers,
they were all working to make
Anglicanism Roman Catholic.
They wanted to
introduce many Roman
Catholic practices
into Angilcanism.
And about 200 Anglicans
converted to Roman Catholicism
at that time, and
thousands of members.
So neither are but 1,000
and Anglican ministers
ready to convert to Roman in
the year of our lord, 2011.
So the whole
Anglo-Catholic movement
has been going on in England.
And out of that, in
Wescott and Hort,
they really were in the
midst of all that furor
about introducing Roman Catholic
ideas into the Anglican church.
-Wescott and Hort
in their letters,
they're very pro-Catholic.
NARRATOR: At one point, Wescott
described seeing a Pietta
statue of the Catholic Mary
holding the dead body of Jesus.
He wrote "had I
been alone, I could
have knelt there for hours."
-And Hort said that there's
no difference between Jesus
worship and Mary worship
in it's causes and effects.
So there's a very strong
Catholic thing there,
as it was with the
American committee.
With Phillip Shaff.
He was very supportive
of Catholicism.
NARRATOR: Philip Shaff would
lead the committee that
would develop the American
standard version of the Bible
in 1901, based on
the same Greek text
created by Wescott and Hort.
Like Tischendorf, Shaff met
privately with Pope Gregory
the 16th and even admitted
to kissing his red slipper.
Shaff would become known as the
ecumenical profit who claimed
he was promoting the
germs of a new theology.
LES GARRETT: We know he was
hitting with all of that
because he was one of
the founders of the World
Parliament of Religion that had
their first meeting in 1893.
And the speakers at that were
from all sorts of religions.
They were from Buddhists,
Buddhism, Hinduism,
these were all the
speakers that spoke.
Shintoism, the bishop of
Japan spoke on Shintoism.
And the subjects that they
covered was quite amazing.
And so there was a
mixture of Islam,
there was a Muslim speaker, and
Christian Science, and New Age.
Annie Passat was
the opening speaker,
who was a co-author of the
magazine called Lucifer, which
was a part of the
society's publication.
So there was a real strong
root and connection there.
NARRATOR: During these
events , the Lord's Prayer
was retitled the
Universal Prayer.
Their motto was have
we not all one father?
Hath not one God created us?
If you read the historic
account of the Parliament
there's no question that
there was a very strong focus
on Christianity and the Bible.
But the idea was that
Christ was inclusive.
And so rather than
calling for all those
who worshiped idols to repent,
as Paul when he witnessed
to the Athenians, the
Parliament determined
that all the pagan
religions should be embraced
and intermingled
with Christianity.
Strangely, the subject
of Phillip Shaff's speech
was the reunion of Christendom.
In it, he said "There is a
unity of Christian scholarship
of all creeds.
This unity has been
strikingly illustrated
in the Anglo American revision
of the authorized version
of the scriptures"
Was Shaff somehow suggesting
that the revision committee
of 1870 was part of
a greater agenda?
It is worth considering that
when Wescott and Hort finished
their revision of
the King James Bible,
their new Greek text was openly
condemned by Dean John Bergen,
who published a critique
titled The Revision Revised.
In it he said "I frankly confess
that to me all this looks very
much indeed like what, in
the language of lawyers,
is called conspiracy."
-Do you believe that
the Jesuit's Counter
Reformation is going
on still today?
DR. RONALD COOKE: Oh yeah.
I believe that that's one of
the main efforts of the Church
of Rome to undo the work of
the Protestant Reformation.
I think the Jesuits, they
have been in the forefront
of the battle and
they were so evil
that the popes finally
disbanded them.
The first pope that was
going to do that was poisoned
and the second pope, he said
that they would probably
get him too, and he was also,
after he signed the bill
to suppress the order,
he suffered a long time
in agony from the
poison that he got.
But then they were reintroduced
again by the church
and so they're
still working today.
They've changed their
tactics I believe
to work in the
ecumenical movement.
In the 20th century, the
Vatican would take the concept
of ecumenical community
to a global level
through Vatican Council II,
which redefined the position
of Rome on all the
religions of the world.
But exactly what role will
the revision of the Bible
play in this new movement?
At the world parliament
in 1893, Philip Schaff
said, "Christ
promised us one flock
under one shepherd,
but not one fold.
The famous passage, John
10:16, has been mistranslated--
And the error has passed into
the King James's version.
Christ flock is one, but
there are many folds.
We must look therefore
to a much broader union."
In the scripture, Jesus said,
"I am the way, the truth,
and the life: no man cometh
unto the Father, but by me."
While the apostle
Peter declared,
"Neither is there
salvation in any other.
For there is none other
name under heaven given
among men whereby
we must be saved."
Meanwhile, the apostle
Paul warned the church
when he said, "If any man
preach any other gospel--
let him be accursed.
Yet, if men could believe that
the earliest New Testament
manuscripts were full of errors,
and that early Christians were
unsure of what to
believe, then it
could be possible that such
bold verses in the scripture
are not so decisive after all.
And hence, the door to many
religions could thus be opened.
Is this perhaps what
Rome desired all along?
Many examples might be given
for the influence of Rome
in modern times.
But among the more interesting
is an interview with Leo
Hindery, the managing partner
of Intermedia Partners.
His company took
possession of the largest
Christian publishing
house in the world,
Thomas Nelson Publishers.
In this interview,
Hindery was asked
about what drove him
to be successful.
-What gave you the ambition
to go from you know,
sort of blue collar jobs
to wanting to become I
guess a business man.
-Lots of demons,
lots of devils that
have already caused
me to want to succeed.
I was blessed with
some some intellect
that some intellectual curiosity
as well that just drove me.
I had a lot of my
early influences
came from the Jesuits.
I was Jesuit trained
in both the high school
level and the College.
And I always knew that I wanted
it to be something special.
I don't mean that
self-servingly,
but I didn't want to succeed
and be well thought of.
And I give a lot of the early,
early credit to the Jesuits.
NARRATOR: In 2011,
Intermedia Partners
sold possession of Thomas Nelson
to Rupert Murdoch, most famous
for his ownership of Fox News.
Murdoch is also a Knight
of the Pontifical Order
of Saint Gregory, knighted
by the pope for his service
to Rome.
Through Thomas Nelson,
Murdoch's company
now publishes the
new King James Bible.
And through Zondervan, he
publishes the NIV Bible
as well.
Interestingly, Mr. Murdoch
also owns HarperCollins that
publishes the Satanic Bible
for the Church of Satan.
But are these things just
strange coincidences,
or could there be
other powers at work?
We considered this interview
with the late Malachi Martin,
a former Jesuit priest, and
author of a best selling book
on the history of
the Jesuit order.
In this interview,
Martin reveals
what are said to be the
dark powers at work in Rome.
-"Father uh, I've got an
article here, entitled,
Two Eminent Churchmen Agree
uh-- that there actually is--
this is a shocker
to a lot of people.
Uh, there is-- There are
Satanic practices going on
at the Vatican--
could that be true?"
-"Yes.
Now when we say in the Vatican,
it's at a certain level,
and um there's no doubt about
it, that there have been
and still are practices
that are uh formally
uh venerating Lucifer,
the prince of this world."
NARRATOR: In the
scripture the destruction
of spiritual Babylon
is clearly foretold.
We read that, "Babylon
the Great is fallen,
is fallen, and has become
the habitation of devils,
and the hold of
every foul spirit,
and a cage of every
unclean and hateful bird.
And I heard another
voice from heaven saying,
'Come out of her my people
that ye be not partakers of her
sins, and that ye receive not of
her plagues.' For her sins have
reached on to
heaven, and God hath
remembered her inequities."
In the Gospel of Matthew,
Jesus told the parable
of a man who sowed
good seed in his field.
But while men
slept, an enemy came
and sowed tares among the wheat.
The tare is said to be a type
of weed, known as the darnel.
The darnel is sometimes
called false wheat,
because as it grows it
appears almost exactly
like the real wheat
surrounding it.
But as it nears the harvest,
the wheat terms golden brown
but the darnel turns black, and
its seeds are full of poison.
Jesus said, "He that soweth the
good seed is the son of man;
the field is the world.
The good seed are the
children of the kingdom.
But the tares are the
children of the wicked one.
The enemy that sowed
them is the devil."
With these things in mind, we
ask the question, when it comes
to the history of the Church and
the Bible, who are the tares,
and who are the wheat?
And for which of them,
has been preserved
the true and faithful
record of the word of God?
NARRATOR: For
nearly 2,000 years,
the world has been turned
upside down over what can only
be called the most
controversial book of all time.
To its critics, the Bible
is merely a combination
of myth and legend
mingled with history.
But for those who believe
in its sacred writings,
it is the inspired and
inherent word of God.
A divine record that not only
tells the way by which men get
to Heaven, but also warns of an
eternal judgment for those who
reject the light of
truth found within.
Jesus said, "And this is the
condemnation, that light is
come into the world, and men
loved darkness rather than
light, because their
deeds were evil."
[MUSIC PLAYING]
NARRATOR: After he was crucified
and raised from the dead,
the followers of Jesus Christ
went into all the world.
To the Jews first and
then to the Gentiles,
they preach that Jesus
is the true messiah
and that he suffered
for the sins of men
according to the writings
of the holy scripture.
-"To him give all
the prophets witness,
that through his name
whosoever believeth in him
shall receive
remission of sins."
NARRATOR: But Jesus himself
had said to his disciples,
"I send you forth as sheep,
in the midst of wolves."
The apostles also
warned believers
about seducing spirits
and doctrines of devils,
and of certain men
who would creep
into the church with
deception and lies.
-"But there were false
prophets also among the people,
even as there shall be
false teachers among you,
who privily shall bring
in damnable heresies,
even denying the Lord
that bought them,
and bring upon themselves
swift destruction."
[MUSIC PLAYING]
NARRATOR: Through the Middle
Ages many of the reformers
came to believe that
these warnings pertained
to the rise of the Roman church.
In the Book of Revelation
they saw the picture
of Rome's Apostasy presented
as an unfaithful woman
sitting atop a
seven headed beast.
"And upon her forehead
was a name written,
Mystery, Babylon the
Great, the Mother
of Harlots and
Abominations of the Earth.
And I saw the woman drunken
with the blood of the saints,
and with the blood of
the martyrs of Jesus."
But the Roman church did
not rise up overnight.
It came about one step at a time
through the early centuries.
DR. RONALD COOKE: If you look
at your early church history,
you had five patriarchates
that came into being.
Antioch, Jerusalem, Alexandria,
Constantinople, and Rome.
So you had five
main church centers
over the first couple
of hundred years.
But Alexandria
fell, and Jerusalem
and Antioch also fell, early on.
So you're left with
Constantinople and Rome.
So you had those
two but Rome gained
the ascendancy in the West.
DR. HENRY HUDSON:
There developed,
by the fourth, fifth, sixth
century, controversies
among all the bishops in various
parts of the world, especially
Europe and in the Middle East.
And whenever there
was a controversy,
some court had to decide
what the answer is.
DR. RONALD COOKE: And
many problems that arose,
early on theological
problems, would then
be sent to Rome to be
looked at and answers given.
NARRATOR: While the
New Testament church
had begun in ancient
Jerusalem and spread
throughout the Gentile world,
somehow the leadership of Rome
dominated as the chief
oracle in matters of debate.
DR. HENRY HUDSON:
Well, you've got
to remember the history of Rome.
The Roman Empire was a great
empire for hundreds of years.
And the popes became the
heirs to that kind of power.
NARRATOR: In the fifth century,
one of the most well known
doctors of the early
church, Augustine of Hippo,
would make reference
to a conflict that
arose between certain
African bishops.
Augustine wrote,
"In this matter,
two councils have already sent
letters to the Apostolic See
and from thence
rescripts have come back.
The cause is finished."
DR. HENRY HUDSON: What Augustine
was saying in that very
famous statement,
he was saying this.
If Rome makes a decision,
that settles it.
So they needed a court and
the prestige of the empire
was in the city of Rome
by Augustine's time.
And so that's all
he's saying, he
said, when we have an
issue, when we have
a difference of opinion,
let's turn to Rome.
NARRATOR: In the centuries that
followed, Augustine's statement
would be paraphrased
by the popes
and doctors of the Roman church.
His words were taken to
mean, "Rome has spoken,
the matter is closed."
In other words, if the Church
of Rome sets forth an opinion,
all other churches must obey.
Then, in the fifth
century, the ancient empire
suffered its decline and fell as
it was sacked by the barbarian
tribes that would reduce the
City of Seven Hills to ruin.
DR. RONALD COOKE:
Rome was overrun
by the Huns and Attila the Hun.
And so the whole system of
the empire was defeated.
And so the popes
then began to take
the place of the
ancient ceasars.
And so they came to take over
not only spiritual leadership
but also political leadership.
And so Rome from then on
grasped at more and more power.
And that's how the papacy
really came into being.
NARRATOR: While the papacy
did not spring up overnight,
and there were many events
that led to its development,
the date most often looked
to by Protestant historians
is 606 AD, when the Roman
emperor, Phocas, named Pope
Boniface the Third
the universal bishop
over all the Christian churches.
This is when the
papal power was said
to be officially
established in Rome.
ROGER OAKLAND: For a man to
say that he is the true leader
of all Christianity
is not only unbiblical
but it goes completely
against God's word
and it opens the door
for a control system
to be set up that can control
the world that Satan can use.
And so I would say
that this concept
of a pope from the beginning
was Satan's plan for man
to manipulate the church,
in the name of Christ,
but set up a system
of anti-Christ
or anti-Christian belief system.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Once the
papal system came into being,
and it was clear that it
represented an apostate system
that combined pagan
teachings and traditions
with worldly politics, all
under the mask of Christianity,
you had Christians then that
fell into two categories.
There were those who followed
after the teachings of the pope
and the Church of Rome.
And then you had those who
were known throughout history
as Bible believers, who kept
themselves separate from Rome
and were determined to base
their faith on the scriptures
alone, without any kind
of man-made doctrines
or sacred councils, which
they had in the Roman system.
NARRATOR: It was because they
rejected the pope's claims
of authority that many
Bible believers were
persecuted in the
early centuries.
English author Adrian Hilton
writes that "The Roman
pseudo-Christianity caused
many faithful believers
to flee into the mountains
of Europe and Asia Minor
to escape persecution and death.
And there they continued,
away from the world's view,
as the true Church of Christ.
DR. RONALD COOKE: These groups,
in many cases, opposed Rome.
They usually looked upon
Rome as the Antichrist.
They looked upon the
Mass as blasphemy.
They didn't believe in
the priesthood of Rome.
And many other of
the teachings of Rome
they repudiated and
claimed that they
went back to the early church.
Particularly the Waldensians,
or the Vallenses.
They claimed they
were the true Church
and they didn't
separate from Rome
but Rome separated from them.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: They were
Christians around who did not
always see eye to
eye with the pope
or the Roman Catholic Church.
In fact there were
a number of them.
INTERVIEWER (OFFSCREEN): Do you
believe these earlier groups,
the Waldenses and the
Albigenses were Christians?
DR. HENRY HUDSON: Yeah,
many of them were.
I've read their writings
and studied their history
and they were willing
to die for their faith.
DR. RONALD COOKE:
The Paulicians also
go back into Armenia and other
places, way back as early
as the fourth century.
They believe also they were
continuing the true Church
and opposed, they
opposed, everything
about the papal
church and looked
upon it as the Anti-Christ.
NARRATOR: The belief that these
earlier groups were in fact
Christians was
held by nearly all
of the reformers including men
like John Wickliffe, Martin
Luther, John Calvin,
and many others.
In fact, many Christians
are familiar with the idea
of America as a city on a hill.
Well that speech was originally
given by Governor John
Winthrop, who was
one of the founders
of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
And as he and the other
Puritans came to the New World,
he gave this speech
about America, or they
themselves, as a city on a hill.
But at the beginning
of that speech,
he makes reference
to the Waldenses
as an example of
Christian charity.
In his speech, Winthrop said,
"We are a company professing
ourselves fellow
members of Christ.
We ought to account ourselves
knit together by this bond
of love, and live in
the exercise of it.
This was notorious in the
practice of the Christians
in former times as is
testified of the Waldenses.
They used to love or any
of their own religion,
even before they were
acquainted with them."
Nevertheless, modern
histories continue
to report that these early
Bible believers were heretics
who believed in
occult doctrines.
INTERVIEWER (OFFSCREEN): What
do you say to people who present
those modern,
historic arguments?
DR. RONALD COOKE: Well, I
would say, first of all,
that a lot of our
history comes from Rome.
We have to recognize that.
It was old Gibbon who said
that when the wars are fought,
the victors tell the story.
I'm not getting
his words exactly,
but that's the gist
of what he says.
He says, in other words, it is
the victors who tell the story.
So if you're a defeated
Christian small group,
then you are--
your story is told
from the standpoint of
those who conquered you.
And Pelican, the
modern American scholar
says, and there is no other way,
many times, to tell the story.
NARRATOR: The common charge
against the Waldenses
and Albigenses is that these
groups held to unorthodox ideas
about God and that they
were guilty of what
was called the Manichean heresy.
DR. RONALD COOKE: The Manicheans
believed, they were dualists,
they believed in a God of
good and a God of evil.
And that was one of the
great heresies of the church.
NARRATOR: In time,
the word Manichean
came to be a general
term for heresy
but did not necessarily mean
that a person actually believed
the doctrines of the Manicheans.
When Martin Luther begin the
Reformation, the Synod of Sens
accused him of
being a Manichean.
In fact, modern
historian SJ Barnett
writes that, "During and
after the Reformation,
Catholic propagandists
hoped to undermine
the legitimacy of Protestantism.
Catholic apologists usually
designated Luther and Calvin
as Manichean heretics from the
third century dualist heresy."
DR. RONALD COOKE: When they
couldn't find anything wrong
with a so-called
heretic, they would
charge them with Manicheanism.
Because that was always
punishable by death.
So if I couldn't find
out that you were
a heretic in some other way,
then I would just charge you
as being a Manichean and that
way I could put you to death
and I didn't have to prove
a whole lot of other things
against you.
So that was one of
the tactics of Rome--
was to charge whatever
groups were being charged
with whatever heresies they
were being investigated
for-- to charge them with
Manicheanism so that their case
could be made easier and they
could be shown to be true
heretics.
So you cannot take a lot of
the information that we get.
You have to certainly
investigate it thoroughly
to find out what
these groups believed.
ROGER OAKLAND: They
refused to acknowledge
the dogmas, or the ideas or
the doctrines that were being
promoted by men, that
weren't biblical.
And so they took a
biblical position
and because of their biblical
position, they were persecuted.
NARRATOR: As we said earlier,
most of the reformers
believed that the charges of
heresy against these earlier
groups were falsely
created by Rome
to justify her persecutions.
Yet most Protestant historians
believe that the Waldenses
and the Albigenses were
forerunners of the Reformation.
19th century historian
William Jones
wrote, "That to justify the
Wldenses and Albigenses is
indeed to defend the
Reformation and Reformers.
They having so long before
us, with an exemplary courage,
labored to preserve
the Christian religion
in its ancient purity
which the Church of Rome
all this while has
endeavored to abolish."
To be more specific, it
would be more accurate to say
that the popes have
endeavored to abolish biblical
Christianity in favor
of a religious system
of their own making.
And because of
this, they have seen
the Bible as their chief enemy.
And this is the reason
why they outlawed it
from being read by
the common people.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Throughout history, they
gave different pronouncements
saying that you can't
give these holy
things to the swine.
And they used that scripture--
it's completely bogus-- pearls
before swine doesn't
have anything
to do with giving the
life-giving scripture
to the people, but the
Roman Catholic Church just
looked at the common man
as pigs who could not
possibly understand
the scriptures.
NARRATOR: Because of this,
Martin Luther, and eventually
the rest of the reformers, came
to believe that the pope was
the fulfillment of biblical
warnings concerning
the greatest enemy of Christ.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: If you make
a study of the life of Luther,
you'll find that there was a
very slow transition from 1517,
when he nailed the 95 Theses
to the door, to about the year
1520.
So that's only a
matter of three years.
But from someone who thought
he was being faithful
to the church-- even
though it was the Roman
church-- to the time
he gets to 1520,
and there's a bull which
actually excommunicates him,
he turns and he actually
says that I am convinced now
that the pope sitting on
the throne there in Rome
is the Antichrist.
Because he was so contrary--
his power and teaching
so contrary-- to the basic
truths of the gospel.
NARRATOR: Luther and many others
preached the gospel of grace
and brought forth the
Protestant Reformation.
But their chief obstacle
was the conflict
between the biblical teaching
of salvation by faith in Christ
as a free gift from God versus
Rome's teaching of a work
salvation based on the rituals
of the Catholic church.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: The
Roman church was teaching,
had been teaching, for five
hundred years or longer,
that a man is
saved by his works.
And then, some of the
contemporary scholars
say you're wrong.
Because the medieval
theologians did
believe that the
power, or the-- they
called it the potentia
absoluta-- the potent power,
the absolute power
of God can save
a soul by grace through faith.
Yeah, they did say that.
But then they said,
yeah but there's
the potentia ordinata of God.
And you'll say,
well, what is that?
Well, while God could do
that because he's absolutely
sovereign, that's not
the method he ordained.
The method he ordained was
the church and the ordinances,
or the sacraments.
And through the sacraments,
if a man-- the terms are very
clear-- you have
to factura en quad
se est. That's Latin
for a man has to do,
within himself, what he has
to do to prepare himself
for what's called the
merit of congruity.
And when he does
that, then God comes
in with a merit of condignity.
So it's a very, very
complicated process.
And that's still believed today.
And yet it goes back
to the middle ages.
Because you're building up a
storehouse of merit, and that's
the whole system.
INTERVIEWER (OFFSCREEN): Is that
basically works righteousness?
DR. HENRY HUDSON: Yeah,
that's exactly what it is.
NARRATOR: While
such debates might
seem tedious in
the modern world,
to the people of the Middle Ages
the understanding of salvation
was quite literally a
matter of life and death.
Centuries later, and the
doctrine of work salvation
through sacraments and rituals
continues in the Church of Rome
today, where more than
one billion Catholics
follow the teachings
of the pope.
DR. RONALD COOKE: To deceive
one billion people about
their eternal destiny, I think
you cannot get a greater lie
than that, nor a greater
misrepresentation
of the scripture.
When it says Christ has purged
our sins when he sat down
at the right hand of
the majesty on high--
and in the Latin vulgate,
that is purgatorium--
it's the very same root from
which they get purgatory.
But the Bible teaches
nothing about purgatory.
The Bible teaches that
Christ has purged our sins
and taken our sins in
his own body on the tree
that we might go free
and be pardoned and not
have to go to some
purgatorial fires
to get our sins purged away.
So it's a blasphemy against
the cross-work of Christ
and the resurrection of
Christ that assures us
that our sins have been
forgiven and that we stand
justified before God
through the cross-work,
death and resurrection
of Christ.
NARRATOR: To oppose
the papal teaching,
the reformers declared that
salvation was by God's grace
alone, through faith
alone, in Christ alone.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: Where
John Fox and the reformers,
they rediscovered-- beginning
with Martin Luther--
the just shall live by faith.
NARRATOR: And to
prove their doctrine,
they were determined to make
the Bible available to all men.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Martin Luther
took Erasmus' 1519, a
Greek New Testament,
and he translated his
September Bible, 1522.
And they were sold
as quick as they
could come off the
printing press.
And people began
reading it and realized
that Rome was telling them lies.
And they begin
trusting Jesus Christ.
Hence, you had the start of the
Reformation in Germany there.
NARRATOR: From Germany, Luther's
teaching spread to England
and would influence William
Tyndale, the man whose mission
would be to ensure that
even a common plow boy could
read the word of God.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
started reading the word of God.
He had a desire for the
people to have the word of God
and so the Reformation
just breaks out.
And Roman Catholicism,
the Catholics, they
can't put a lid on it.
Because once the people get the
Bible in their own language,
the Bible says you
shall know the truth
and the truth will
make you free.
And people started getting
this huge burden of sin
off of their shoulders.
I think of Thomas Bilney.
Thomas Bilney thought he was
the Judas of his generation.
And so he thought he
would do something
that was worthy of betrayal.
And so he went out
and secretly bought
an Erasmus New Testament.
And he opened it
to 1 Timothy, where
Paul says he's the
chiefest of sinners
and that Christ came into
the world to die for them.
He says if God can forgive
Paul, he can forgive me.
He was gloriously saved.
And let me just tell you,
he went to confession.
And he goes and
confesses to Latimer.
Tells Latimer, father
Latimer, he tells him,
father, I've sinned.
I went and bought this
Greek New Testament
and I read about how
Jesus Christ forgives sins
and I've trusted Jesus
Christ as my personal Savior.
And Latimer says,
in his own words,
reading "Fox's Book of Martyrs,"
I learned more that day,
from that confession of Thomas
Bilney that I had learned
in 20 years of
studying the scripture.
It happened to be that
Hugh Latimer comes
to know Jesus Christ
as his personal Savior.
So as the word of God gets
out, Chris, it's like a fire.
It goes and people read
it, and they're set free.
And I'll tell you, Bilney says
it was sweeter than eating
fresh honey out of
the honeycomb as he's
talking about the scriptures.
Even it's said of
William Tyndale,
he was a man who was singularly
addicted to the scriptures.
NARRATOR: Like William Tyndale,
Thomas Bilney and Hugh Latimer
would both be condemned
by the Church of Rome
and were burned at the stake for
their faith in the word of God.
Nevertheless, their
sacrifice was not in vain,
as their deaths and
those of many others,
inspired countless souls
across Europe to turn from Rome
and embrace the true gospel.
VOICE OFFSCREEN: And they were
burning the saints of God.
Thank God the the gospel
burned with mighty fire.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
cast kept them
opressed and surpressed
and it kept them under
a bondage of guilt.
And Jesus Christ through the
scriptures sets them free.
The Holy Spirit used the holy
word of God to set them free.
NARRATOR: But this
freedom would not
be proclaimed
without consequence.
The Church of Rome responded
with its own counter attack.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: To understand
what the Vatican did next,
we have to realize
the tremendous impact
that the Reformation had.
Protestant historian JA Wylie
wrote that the Reformation had
transformed whole
countries all over Europe
and it would ultimately
change the world.
NARRATOR: Wylie wrote that,
"Advancing over all opposition,
this great religious revival,
not yet half a century old
had acquired a strength and
a breadth truly amazing.
From the little Saxon
town of Wittenburg,
it had spread itself
out, comprehending
the powerful kingdoms of
Saxony, Pomerania, Poland,
Bohemia, Hungary,
and Transylvania.
The Reformation had been
welcomed by Norway, Sweden,
Denmark, Holland,
and the Netherlands.
Its career had been one of
unimpeded, continuous victory.
The South and West of
France were Protestant,
and the supremacy
of the Reformation
seemed all but certain.
Of the countries
of Western Europe,
only two, Italy and Spain,
now remained with the pope."
DR. RONALD COOKE:
They didn't take
Martin Luther
seriously at first.
Nor did they take his
movement very seriously.
But as it began to
spread, they realized
they had a real fight on
their hands, so to speak.
NARRATOR: In 1540,
the pope commissioned
a former Spanish soldier,
named Ignatius Loyola,
to form a military
company of priests
within the Catholic church.
Their chief purpose was to
launch a Counter Reformation,
to destroy the work
of the reformers,
and bring the
Protestant churches back
under the authority of the pope.
They were named the Society of
Jesus, or as their enemies call
them, the Jesuits.
DR. RONALD COOKE: Malachi
Catholic writer, would
practically call them
the storm troopers
of the papacy.
Their idea was to defeat the
Protestant churches there
that were going on
throughout Europe
at the time of the Reformation.
And then to continue that
work in education, the forming
of universities,
colleges, seminaries,
all across America
and across Europe.
So the Jesuits really have been
engaged in just about every
kind of activity known to man,
educational, and subversive,
intrigue.
And many people have said they
were linked to assassinations.
So the Counter Reformation
involved wars, sieges,
everything under the sun, to
try to defeat Protestantism.
NARRATOR: But the key point
of contention was the Bible.
It was how the reformers
understood the scripture
and preached to the
population at large that
was the greatest threat to Rome.
-They're dangerous.
They're dangerous
to everything we
believe as the Catholic church.
And we've got to do
something to stop it.
NARRATOR: With the
printing press,
the Bible was being
translated and duplicated
at unprecedented rates
throughout Europe.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
There was a rash
of Bible translation
and Bible publication.
And it all came to
a screeching halt
after the King James
version of the Bible.
Virtually all translation stops.
There was such a
flurry from 1526
until 1611.
It was so meticulously
done by people
who believed that God
had inspired his word.
NARRATOR: The King
James translation
would in time be considered
the crowning achievement
of the Protestant Reformation
and would come to symbolize all
that the martyrs had
suffered for the word of God.
But because of its association
with the reform, something
the Vatican saw as
an act of rebellion
against her authority,
the King James version
would come to be hated by Rome.
DR. ALAN O'REILLY: That is
the fruit of the Reformation
that the Jesuits want
to destroy above all.
Because until they do that,
they cannot be sure of getting
the entire world, and
especially England,
back under the
thrall of the popary.
NARRATOR: In 1825, the Jesuits,
meeting in Chieri, Italy,
declared their intention to
seize control of the Bible
as part of their
centuries-old plan
to bring all the world
under the power of Rome.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: If you
study the Jesuits in history,
you discover that they operate
more like an intelligence
community, like the CIA or MI6,
rather than a religious order.
And they are primarily
the supporters
of what is called papist
or Romanist doctorine.
And this is the belief that Rome
should govern the whole world.
It does not necessarily
apply to all Catholics,
because many Catholics
don't agree with it.
But papist doctrine is
essentially the belief
that because the pope
is the Vicar of Christ,
and he stands in the
place of Christ himself,
and because Christ
is the King of Kings,
therefore, the pope should have
the authority to reign over
all the kings and
princes on planet Earth.
And it is this doctrine
that led to nearly
all the wars of old Europe.
NARRATOR: Even in the
late 19th century,
Rome's plan for
world dominion was
known and documented
among English churchmen.
In 1888, a meeting of the
Protestant missions in London
=ed that "the missionary
program of the Vatican,
doubt it who may, embraces
the conversion of Britain
and the United States of
America, and through them,
the subjugation of
the whole world."
NARRATOR: To
accomplish their aims,
the Jesuits deemed it necessary
to take control of the Bible.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Because the
Bible exposes all of the lies
and the false doctrines
of the papacy,
it has always been
hated by Rome.
And they've admitted repeatedly
that the teaching of scripture
contradicts the teaching--
the official teaching--
of the Roman Catholic Church.
And so once you realize
that's the real conflict.
It's between the
authority of the pope
versus the authority
of the Bible.
And at that point
the Jesuit doctrines
begin to make a lot more sense.
NARRATOR: In modern times,
the Jesuit view of the Bible
was exposed by
Doctor Ian Paisley,
the former first minister of
Northern Ireland, who has spent
decades fighting against Rome's
influence in his own country.
-We're not responsible
for the violence.
The violence comes from
the Roman Catholic Church.
NARRATOR: Calling himself
a historic Protestant,
Paisley has continually
protested the authority
of the pope, both politically
and theologically.
-Ulster will not fall to him.
-I want you to see this wafer
after it is consecrated.
The church of Rome teaches, that
it is the actual body, bones,
blood, sinews and
deity of Jesus Christ.
[CROWD APPLAUSE]
-The Lord Jesus Christ
offered on the cross one
full, complete, and never to
be repeated sacrifice for sins.
And God does not
come down from Heaven
at the whim of a
bachelor priest.
[CROWD APPLAUSE]
NARRATOR: In more recent
years, Paisley spoke openly
on European radio exposing
a document that reveals
the Jesuit's view
of the Bible versus
the authority of the pope.
DR. IAN PAISLEY: Bishop
Wordsworth, an eminent Church
of England divine, uncovers
the secrecy of the Jesuits
in the exposure of a
document, used by them
in their early days
to compel Protestants
to submit to Mother Church.
Roman Catholic
Confession publicly
prescribed and
proposed to protestants
on their admission to the
Roman Catholic Church.
We confess that we've
been brought from heresy,
to the true saving
Roman Catholic faith.
By the singular care of
our supreme governors,
and by the diligance
and aid of our masters,
the fathers of all
the Order of Jesuits.
And we desire to certify this by
our vows to the world at large.
We confess that whatever
new thing the Pope ordains,
whether it be in scripture
or not in scripture,
and whatever he commands
is divine and therefore
ought to be held by lay
people in greater esteem
than the precepts
of the living God.
We confess that the
reading of holy scripture
is the origin of
heresy, and schism
and the source of blasphemy.
We confess that holy
scripture is imperfect,
and a dead letter until it
is explained by the Supreme
Pontiff, and allowed by him
to be read by the laity.
We confess and assert that the
pope is our most holy father,
is to be obeyed on all
things, without any exception,
and that such heretics
as contravene his orders,
are not only to
be burnt but to be
delivered body
and soul to Hell."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Since the Middle Ages,
that Jesuit's core agenda
has had to do with compelling
their followers to renounce
the authority of the Bible
in favor of the
authority of the pope.
Then in the 19th century,
their movement gained momentum
and through their
textual critics
they insisted that the
Bible was a flawed book.
And they set about
trying to prove
all the flaws they
could to the world.
And at the same
time, they officially
declared through
Vatican Council one
that the pope was infallible.
So their message was clear.
Don't trust the
Bible, trust the pope.
The Bible's a flawed book,
the pope is infallible.
And so this brought everything
full circle to the conflict
that had been raging
for hundreds of years
throughout the Middle Ages.
And that's ultimately what
their meeting in Chieri, Italy
was all about.
NARRATOR: The information
discussed by Jesuit leaders
in Chieri was published
in 1848 by a former Jesuit
initiate named Jacopo Leone.
His book was titled
The Jesuit Conspiracy,
The Secret Plan of the Order.
In it, he claimed to have
overheard the plans of Jesuit
leaders and was compelled to
write down the information
and publish it as a warning
to the rest of the world.
Leone wrote specifically
of how the Jesuits
intended to take
control of the Bible.
Allegedly, they said "Then
the Bible, that serpent which,
with head erect and
eyes flashing fire,
threatens us with its venom,
shall be changed again
into a rod, as soon as
we are able to seize it.
Oh then, mysterious rod!
We will not again suffer thee
to escape from our hands.
For you know too well, that
for three centuries past,
this cruel asp has
left us no repose.
You well know with what
folds it entwines us,
and with what
fangs it gnaws us."
According to Leone,
one of the Jesuits
openly admitted that
the scriptures do not
support the Roman
Catholic faith.
Speaking of the Bible he said,
"If I may tell you openly
what I think of this book,
it is not at all for us.
It is against us.
I do not wonder at the
invincible obstinancy
it engenders in all those who
regard its verses as inspired.
In the simplicity
of youth, I fully
expected on opening the
New Testament to find there
the authority of a superior
chief in the Church.
The worship of the Virgin,
the mass, purgatory, relics.
But in every page, I found
my expectations disappointed.
At last, after having read,
at least six times over,
that little book, I was forced
to acknowledge to myself
that it actually
sets forth a system
of religion,
altogether different."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: What this
Jesuit priest acknowledged all
the way back in the 19th
century is the same thing
that the reformers acknowledge.
They noticed that the
teachings of the Bible
and the teachings of the pope
were dramatically different.
The difference is that
the reformers chose
to follow the Bible,
while the Jesuits chose
to fight against it on
behalf of the traditions
and power of the
Catholic church.
NARRATOR: The view of that
Jesuits toward the Bible
could be likened to that of
the ancient Pharisees 2000
years ago, who opposed Christ.
As Jesus said of
them, "Full well,
ye reject the commandment
of God that ye
may keep your own tradition."
And again, he
said, "In vain they
do worship me,
teaching for doctrines
the commandments of men.
At their meeting
and Chieri in 1825,
the Jesuits
discussed the methods
to be used in their ongoing
Counter Reformation,
and their plan for the
subversion of the Bible.
They said specifically
that "A few breaches made
in Protestantism-- whether
these conversions proceed
from genuine motives, or
whether they be determined
by advantageous offers,
which shall not be spared
if the person be
worth the trouble--
we ought, by every
possible means,
to secure the aid
of modern thinkers.
If they can be induced to
write at all in our favor,
let us pay them well either
in money or in laudation."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The Jesuits,
since the Middle Ages,
have been known
for seducing people
outside the Catholic
church-- even members
of Protestant churches--
And making deals
with them to help
the cause of Rome.
And this was especially
revealed in the 19th century,
during what was called the
Oxford Movement in England.
And it was in the
wake of this movement
that the Vatican
really pushed to try
and take control of the Bible.
And that's why it's so
important to understand what
the Oxford Movement
was all about.
DR. ALAN O'REILLY: In 1833,
the Oxford Movement started.
It's perhaps not
without significance
that we're not only looking
at what Rome is doing,
we have to consider that
the lord himself will bring
judgment on a nation
that foresakes
him and foresakes
the word of God.
The Oxford Movement
was an attempt,
effectively, to Romanise
the Church of England
and to get the Church of England
away from the scriptures--
from the King James
Bible-- and back
to the ritualistic
practices of Rome.
Now, it was done in
a very subtle manner
and it really typified
the Jesuit approach
of Bishop Olatom which is,
above all, not too much zeal.
And it tried to portray the
true position of the Church
of England as a sort of a
middle of the road organization.
But at the same time, it
did promote what it called
a high view of the sacraments.
So that, although it professed
to be against what it regarded
as extreme Protestants--
sad to say,
Bible believing evangelicals--
and also what it regarded
as extreme Romanism--
say, the persecutions
by Catholocism.
The Inquisition, perhaps--
nevertheless it
sought gradually,
by publications of what were
called Tracts for Our Times,
to give a favorable view to
things like the Roman mass.
NARRATOR: In 1898, a man
named Walter Walsh published
a book titled The Secret
History of the Oxford Movement.
In it, he writes about the
activities of the Jesuits
in England.
He recorded the testimony of
a former Catholic priest who
told him, "In England, there
are a greater number of Jesuits
than in Italy.
There are Jesuits in
all classes of society.
In Parliament, among
the English clergy,
among the Protestant laity,
even in the higher stations."
He went on to say, "I could not
comprehend how a Jesuit could
be a Protestant, or how or
Protestant could be a Jesuit.
But my confessor
silenced my scruples
by telling me that Saint
Paul became as a Jew
that he might save the Jews.
It was no wonder therefore, if
a Jesuit should feign himself
a Protestant for the
conversion of Protestants."
Within less than 20 years
after the Oxford Movement,
another movement began in the
world of biblical scholarship
that would almost
completely transform
the understanding of the Bible.
This transformation
would be affected
by men who were of the
Protestant profession,
but strangely worked in
cooperation with Rome.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
NARRATOR: Prior to
the 19th century,
Protestant scholars
depended on a collection
of Greek manuscripts
that had come into Europe
after the fall of
Constantinople in 1453.
Collectively, these manuscripts
would form the foundation
of the New Testament Greek
used by the reformers.
By men like William
Tyndale, Martin Luther,
the Geneva Bible translators,
and the translation team
for the King James
version of 1611.
These Greek manuscripts
were collated
first by Erasmus of Rotterdam.
Erasmus would lay the foundation
for the traditional text
and further the belief
that the scripture
should be read by all people.
ALEXANDRE VANAUTGAERDEN:
To translate to French,
to English, to
German at this time.
Because it was very
important for Erasmus
that everybody can read the
Bible in his own speaking.
He produced five editions
of his translation
in 1516, 1519, 1522,
1529, and 1535.
All the editions were
published in Basil.
-The Erasmus 1522, it
was really revolutionary
because here we have in
this column-- and just
the beautiful artwork--
but in this column,
you have the Greek.
And what Erasmus did that really
blew people out of the water,
most people could not read Greek
back then, but many of them
could read Latin.
Scholars could read Latin.
He took the Greek and he
translated it into Latin.
And so many people had their
eyes open because they started
reading Erasmus' new translation
of the Latin from the Greek
and they found out that it was
completely different than what
they had in the Latin vulgate
of the Roman Catholic Church.
Then you'll see here,
MDXXII, that is 1522.
VOICE OFFSCREEN:
So this is Erasmus'
second or third edition?
-This is Erasmus' third edition.
It is the Foundation
for Textus Receptus'.
Then we come to Luke.
Again, the Latin and the Greek
that Erasmus had translated.
We can go all the way
back to the apocalypse,
so this is actually the Acts
of the Apostles right here.
But it, of course, goes all the
way through-- page after page
after page-- there we go,
the apocalypse, Revelation.
NARRATOR: The work
begun by Erasmus
would be later continued
by Robert Stephanus, whose
1550 Greek addition would be
used for the Geneva Bible.
In time, his work
would be furthered
by the famed calvinus
scholar, Theodore Beza.
Beza's 1598 Greek New
Testament was chiefly
used for the King
James version of 1611.
But it would be some years
later that the Elsevier brothers
in Holland would publish
the work even further
and give the reformer's
Greek its official name.
In the introduction
of their 1633 addition
they wrote, "What you have
here is the text which is now
received by all
in which, we give
nothing changed or corrupted."
Hence, the Greek of the
Protestant Reformation
would become known as Textus
Receptus, the received texts.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So that
becomes the standard Greek
for Protestant scholars,
and remained so
for nearly 300 years.
NARRATOR: But in
the 19th century,
a German scholar named
Constantin von Tischendorf
would publish what would
become known as the most
ancient Biblical
manuscript ever recovered.
His discovery would turn the
world of Bible scholarship
upside down, convincing
many that his manuscript
was a lost version of the Bible.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
You have to go back
before that, with
German higher criticism.
And they developed a theory,
called the Recension Theory,
and in this Recension
Theory, they
say that the Bible was lost.
NARRATOR: The Recension Theory
was introduced by a man named
Johann Semler in
the 18th century.
One of his disciples,
Jakob Griesbach,
would popularize his theory
among German intellectuals.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Both
Semler and Griesbach
held to unorthodox views of
Christianity, to say the least.
Semler is known as the
father of German rationalism,
and he clearly
influenced Griesbach.
Rationalism in Germany is very
much like the Enlightenment
in France, where they rejected
the idea of the divinity
of Christ because they rejected
the supernatural elements
of the Bible.
The virgin birth, Christ
being raised from the dead,
him ascending, and so on.
All of that to
them in France, it
was unreasonable because
of the reason movement.
Well, in Germany
it was irrational,
hence the term rationalism.
So they believed it was
irrational to believe
those things, so
they rejected them.
And this was the view of
both Semler and Griesbach.
So Semler and
Griesbach were two men
who essentially
rejected the gospel.
And the rationalism
that they were known for
took hold in Germany and Germany
then became the epicenter
for higher criticism
against the Bible.
NARRATOR: The concentration
of activity in Germany
is believed to have been the
working of the Jesuits, whose
aim was to destroy the
confidence of Protestants
in the inerrancy of scripture.
This was acknowledged by
Doctor Ian Paisley, who
had this to say about the
ongoing war waged by Rome
and the Jesuits
against the Bible.
DR. IAN PAISLEY: "And
it's not the word of man,
it's the word of God.
Now, of course, Rome
used to burn the Bibles.
She used to burn the people
that translated them.
She used to burn the
people that read them.
But that didn't succeed.
So, she decided
upon another scheme.
That she would place
her Jesuit priests
in the training of
Protestant ministers.
And so, into the universities
of Germany, Rome set at work
the whole structure of
unbelieving higher criticism.
And she had in the
universities men
who sought to destroy
belief in the Bible.
And we became cursed with what
was known as higher criticism.
And young men had their
faith in the Bible
destroyed in the universities
and in the training colleges.
And so, the men that
came out to be ordained
didn't believe the book.
They didn't believe the
creeds of the church.
They didn't believe in the
historic Christian faith.
And they set to work
to destroy the faith."
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: With that
spirit of textual criticism
and non-belief in the
inspiration of the word of God,
looking at the Bible just like
any other book, scholars--
and even quote,
Christian scholars--
began to follow that line.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Textual
criticism in the proper sense
is not necessarily a bad thing.
DR. D.A. WAITE:
Textual criticism
is a word that is used to
assess the value of one
great manuscript over another.
That's what it is.
It's the bringing of
manuscripts together,
and then showing which
is the one to go with
and which is the
one not to go with.
NARRATOR: The practice
of textual criticism
began in the Middle
Ages and grew out
of the conflicts between Rome
and the Protestant Reformation.
It is most often traced
to a 17th century scholar,
named Richard Simon.
DR. H.D. WILLIAMS:
He is the one who
is alleged to have really
begun this whole process.
He's called the father
of textual criticism.
He was a French Roman
Catholic priest.
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
In the world today,
textual criticism can mean
several different things,
depending on who's
using that term
and how it's being applied.
You have textual criticism
in the ordinary sense, which
is simply a process of going
through ancient manuscripts,
collating them, and trying
to remove any errors,
and trying to figure out
what the original text was
and what it should be.
Then you have what is known
as higher criticism, which
is where you give a historical
analysis of the manuscripts.
And then you begin to question
whether or not Moses could have
really written the
book of Genesis,
or whether Peter could have
written the apostles ascribed
to him, and you begin to
question the authorship
and the historical
nature of the Bible.
And this was the
process that is usually
traced to Richard Simon.
NARRATOR: Simon entered
the priesthood in 1670.
He was initially educated
by Jesuit priests
and then later at the
Sorbonne in Paris.
He would go on to enter the
Congregation of the Oratory.
The purpose of the
Oratory was said
to be "to interpose a
barrier to the continuous and
disquieting progress
of Protestantism."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
All of the orders
that Simon was involved
with-- whether the Jesuits,
or the Sorbonne in Paris,
and then the Oratory--
they were all involved
in variant forms
of the Counter Reformation.
They were all looking
for different ways
to try and overthrow
the Protestant movement.
NARRATOR: Yet Simon's focus
was guided by the Jesuits
from the beginning.
It was they who laid the
foundation for Simon's work
through one of their
original members,
Alfonso Salmeron, who had joined
with Ignatius Loyola in 1534.
We read that, "Salmeron paved
the way for Richard Simon.
The Jesuits introduced into
Catholic reading of the Bible
the parameters of
time, place, context
and semantic structures."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The idea of
applying principles of time
and context don't necessarily
sound like a bad thing
until you realize how
they were being used
as weapons to try and
undermine the Bible.
One example was a book that
was written by another Roman
Catholic named Isaac La
Peyrere during the same area.
And he had written a book
called Men Before Adam
in 1655, in which he argued that
supposedly new information--
scientific data that had
come to light from Greenland,
and China, and so on-- proved
that men lived on the Earth
as far back as 50,000 BC.
Thus throwing into jeopardy the
traditional date for creation
in Genesis, which goes
back to about 4,000 BC.
NARRATOR: We read that "La
Peyrere deployed the hypothesis
of men before Adam in order
to attack the Calvinist
Method of interpreting
scripture according
to the literal sense."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: And so the
idea of higher criticism,
which grew out of this movement
and is also called historic
criticism, the idea behind it
is to arrange certain dates
in history around the Bible in
such a way to make it appear
that the Bible is not a
historically accurate book
and therefore cannot
possibly be the inspired
inerrant word of God.
That's the whole point of it.
NARRATOR: La Peyrere's work
would have a powerful influence
over Richard Simon,
who would further
the assault against
reform teaching.
We read that, "Simon
sharpened historical criticism
into a weapon that could
be used in the attack
on Protestantism's
most fundamental error,
the doctrine of Sola Scriptura."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Sola Scriptura was
one of the mottos
of the reformation
and it means, only
the scripture.
And it's the idea that the
Christian faith should be based
on the teachings of the Bible
alone without any interference
with the doctrines
or teachings of men.
And it's in contrast to the
Roman Catholic teaching, which
says that church tradition
should govern the understanding
of the Bible even
if the two disagree.
NARRATOR: In defense
of his Catholic faith,
Richard Simon wrote that, "The
great changes that have taken
place in the
manuscripts of the Bible
since the first originals
were lost completely
destroy the principle
of the Protestants.
If tradition is not
joined to scripture
there is hardly
anything in religion
that one can
confidently affirm."
But the Bible says of itself
that the scriptures alone
are sufficient for the spiritual
needs of all believers.
The apostle Paul wrote that,
"all scripture is given
by inspiration of God and
is profitable for doctrine,
for reproof, for correction, for
instruction in righteousness,
that the man of
God may be perfect,
thoroughly furnished
unto all good works."
Furthermore, God promises that
he will preserve his words
eternally and that
they cannot be lost.
The Psalmist writes, "Thy word
is true from the beginning,
and every one of thy righteous
judgments endureth forever."
Jesus said, "The scriptures
cannot be broken"
and "Heaven and earth
shall pass away,
but my words shall
not pass away.
For all flesh is grass,
and all the glory
of man as the
flower of the grass.
The grass withereth, and the
flower thereof falleth away
but the Word of the
Lord endureth forever."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
you can define the conflict
between Catholicism
and Protestantism as a
conflict between the authority
of the pope versus the
authority of the Bible.
And this is the whole
reason why the Bible came
to be known as the paper
pope of Protestantism.
That was the name given
to it by the Catholics.
And these arguments
against the Bible
were especially active
in the 19th century,
during the same era that
Constantin von Tischendorf went
searching for his ancient texts.
NARRATOR: The hostility of
Catholics toward the Protestant
Bible was written of by 19th
century historian John Dowling
in his book, The Burning of the
Bibles, where he documented how
Catholics in Champlain, New York
were burning bibles in America
back in 1843.
The beliefs of Catholics during
the 19th and early 20th century
can be shown by the teaching
of Cardinal James Gibbons,
pictured here with President
Theodore Roosevelt.
Gibbons was the
Archbishop of Baltimore
and in his book,
Faith of Our Fathers,
he wrote, "Now the
scriptures alone
do not contain all the truths
which a Christian is bound
to believe because
they do not contain
all the truths necessary
for salvation."
A similar view had been espoused
in England by Cardinal John
Henry Newman,
perhaps the leading
Catholic apologist
of the 19th century.
Speaking of the Bible he said,
"Surely the sacred volume
was never intended to
teach us our creed.
And from the first, it has
been the error of heretics
to attempt of themselves a
work to which they are unequal,
the eliciting of a
systematic doctrine
from the scattered
notices of truth
which Scripture contains."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Essentially
what Newman is saying
is that the error of
the heretics, so-called,
was that they followed the
example of the ancient Boreans,
who searched the
scriptures daily
to test the things
that they were hearing.
And this is something
that the Church of Rome
has always discouraged.
NARRATOR: One of
Newman's contemporaries
was a renowned priest named
Thomas Edward Bridget, who
said that true faith was
"a surrender of the mind,
to a living authority,
known to be divine.
Not a puzzle over
documents, with the doubt
about correct interpretation."
Even the modern Catholic
Encyclopedia openly
declares that "The supremacy
of the Bible as source of faith
is unhistorical, illogical,
fatal to the virtue of faith,
and destructive of unity."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So we see
that Rome's view of the Bible
has not changed in 1,000 years.
The reformers in
their day were trying
to recover the ancient
scripture in such a way
that they could have
a full understanding
of the word of God.
But in contrast,
the Church of Rome
went about looking for
weaknesses in the text
so that the Protestant
doctrine of Sola Scriptura
could be overthrown.
That's the difference.
DR. H.D. WILLIAMS: They were
losing people very rapidly
because of the text
that was preserved
by the priesthood of believers.
Because they were losing people
from the Roman Catholic See,
from their authority.
They had to do something
to counter that influence.
NARRATOR: But while they
were fighting against Sola
Scriptura, they were at the
same time arguing in defense
of the Latin Vulgate, which had
been declared by the Council
of Trent to be the only true,
authoritative scripture.
DR. ALAN O'REILLY: And
they also condemned
Luther's conclusion
that Jerome's Vulgate
was a corrupt Bible--
which we know it is--
and they further
condemned Luther's
conclusion that to
produce a pure Bible,
either German or English
or any other language,
you did have to go
back to what today we
would call the traditional text.
That is, for example, the Greek
text of the New Testament,
which is found in
the vast majority
of surviving Greek manuscripts.
NARRATOR: In their introduction
to the Douay-Rheims Bible,
the Jesuit scholars wrote,
"Se see that by all means,
the old vulgar Latin translation
is approved, good, and better
than the Greek text itself and
that there is no cause why it
should give place to any other
text, copies, or readings."
16th century Anglican
scholar, William Whitaker
said that "The Papists contend
that their Latin text is
authentic of itself,
and ought not
to be tried by the
text of the originals."
Meanwhile, Protestant
scholar Francis Turretin
summed up the debate this way.
He said, "The question is
whether the original text,
in Hebrew or in Greek, has
been so corrupted either
by the carelessness of copyists,
or by the malice of the Jews
and heretics that it
can no longer be held
as the judge by which all
versions are to be judged.
The Roman Catholics
affirm this, we deny it."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
So Rome's position,
according to Turretin, was
that the Greek and the Hebrew
manuscripts had been
so corrupted over time
that they could not be trusted.
And therefore you shouldn't use
those manuscripts to correct
the Latin Vulgate, which is
what Erasmus had done back
right before the
Reformation began.
And that was their main issue.
NARRATOR: We also read that
"In the preface of the Douay,
Roman Catholics contended
that the Latin Vulgate was
translated from the
Hebrew and Greek texts
when they were more pure.
Therefore, many contended
that the Vulgate version
was dictated by the Holy
Spirit, was consequently
of divine authority, and
more to be regarded than even
the original Hebrew
and Greek texts."
Hence, the Jesuit
scholars at Reims
concluded that the Latin
Vulgate is not only better
than all other
Latin translations
but than the Greek
text itself in those
places where they disagree.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So
against Sola Scriptura were
operating on two fronts.
The first part was to discredit
the Greek and the Hebrew
manuscripts as being so full
of corruptions and errors
that they could not be trusted,
thus proving that the Latin
Vogate alone is
the superior text.
And step two, to argue
that because the Bible is
so difficult to interpret, it
is necessary to rely on church
tradition and the infallible
teachings of the pope.
So this is the
academic environment
that had developed for
several hundred years
before Tischendorf
shows up in 1844.
Now, Tischendorf had embraced
the rescention theory,
this idea that the Bible was
lost and needed to be found.
Then you add to that, you
had Catholic scholars,
like Cardinal
Wiseman, who argued
that the truest
representation of the Bible
would be found in
the Latin Vulgate.
And all of these elements came
together in the 19th century
and this is what
inspired Tischendorf
to take his famous journey.
NARRATOR: Tischendorf's
efforts were clearly
aimed against the
traditional Greek text.
In 1866, he would write that "We
have at last hit upon a better
plan which is to set aside this
Textus Receptus altogether,
and to construct a fresh text."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The curious
thing about that quote
is that when
Tischendorf says, we
have hit upon a better plan,
who does he mean by we?
It sounds as though he was
working with somebody else
but he doesn't exactly say who.
NARRATOR: For years
prior to his journey,
Tischendorf had been influenced
by a prominent Catholic scholar
named Nicholas Cardinal Wiseman.
Cardinal Weisman
developed a theory
that old Latin texts had been
developed in North Africa
by the second century.
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Wiseman's assertion
seems to have been an attempt
to try and prove that the Latin
Vulgate was closer to
the original manuscripts
than any known Greek
manuscript at that time.
And it was this theory
that made Tischendorf
partial to the Latin Vulgate.
NARRATOR: We read that,
"In 1842, while in Paris,
Tischendorf prepared an
edition of the New Testament,
intended for the
use of Catholics,
giving the Latin
Vulgate in a Greek text.
Rendered as far as
possible conformable
to it, in parallel columns."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
So what Tischendorf
did is he developed a
Greek manuscript that
would conform to
the Latin Vulgate.
He essentially reversed the
work of Erasmus of Rotterdam
from 300 years earlier.
Remember, Erasmus had
collated the Greek manuscripts
and then published the
first ever parallel Bible,
with the Greek in one column
and the Latin in the other.
And he used the Greek to
correct the errors in the Latin.
Well, now, hundreds
of years later,
Tischendorf reverses
the process.
He does a parallel Bible,
but he does it the other way.
He uses the Latin to
correct the Greek.
And he did this work for
the Catholic archbishop
of Paris, Archbishop Affre.
And so it shows his
relationship with the Catholic
Church at this time.
It's also worth mentioning that
one of Tischendorf's critics
said that Tischendorf only
understood Greek through Latin.
NARRATOR: Tischendorf would
make his great discovery in 1844
when he arrived at St.
Catherine's Monastery,
at the base of what is
called Mount Sinai in Egypt.
But before he arrived,
he took a journey to Rome
and was received at the Vatican.
In his memoirs, Tischendorf
wrote, "I here pass over
in silence, the interesting
details of my travels.
My audience with the Pope,
Gregory XVI, in May, 1843.
my intercourse with
Cardinal Mezzofanti,
that surprising and
celebrated linguist."
Mezzofanti was famous
for his ability
to speak more than 50
languages fluently.
Tischendorf wrote that,
"Mezzofanti honored me
with some Greek verses
composed in my praise."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Tischendorf was well
favored by Rome, which
is odd considering
his status as a
Protestant scholar.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: I can
never quite figure that out.
Why a Protestant
scholar, or one who
claimed to be a
Protestant scholar,
would be meeting with the
pope over the situation.
There's a lot of
unanswered questions.
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
goes to meet in a private
audience with the pope.
It's like going to meet the
president, or a prime minister,
or someone of that position.
And then we have this famous
Catholic cardinal, Mezzofanti,
writing him a poem in
Greek to praise him
as this great scholar and so on.
It's all very strange.
But Tischendorf was
welcomed into Rome
by some of the leading Catholic
authorities at that time.
In fact, in his
memoirs, he reveals
that it was Archbishop
Affre of Paris for whom he
had prepared the parallel Bible.
That gave him his
recommendation to the Vatican.
And then he was received
by Pope Gregory.
NARRATOR: Tischendorf
wrote, "Gregory XVI,
after a prolonged
audience granted to me
took an ardent interest
in my undertaking."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Pope Gregory's
interest in Tischendorf
is curious.
Especially when you consider
that it was the same Pope
Gregory that openly condemned
the Protestant Bible
societies of that time.
NARRATOR: In 1843, American
author John Dowling,
wrote that "The present
Pope, Gregory XVI,
and his predecessor
Pope Leo XII,
denounced all Bible societies
declaring that by the Bible's
they distributed they
converted the Gospel of Christ
into a human gospel.
Or, what is still worse,
the gospel of the devil."
In his encyclical against
the Bible societies,
Pope Gregory wrote "We
have taken great pains
to remind the faithful of
the ancient laws concerning
vernacular translations
of the scriptures."
The pope's wording is suspicious
because it was the ancient laws
of the Roman church that
had Bible believers burned
at the stake for reading or
handling the word of God.
But could this have
been what Pope Gregory
was referring to in his writing?
Several years after
Tischendorf's private audience
at the Vatican, it was
discovered that the Inquisition
had continued underground
in the ancient city.
Charles Spurgeon,
known to millions
as the prince of preachers,
documented the manner
of torture that
had been reported
once the papal
dungeons were revealed.
From Spurgeon's publication,
The Sword and the Trowel,
we read that "They invented
ovens, or furnaces, which being
made red-hot, they lowered
the condemned into them,
bound hand and foot,
and immediately
closed over them the
mouth of the furnace.
This barbarous punishment and
was substituted for the burning
pile and in 1849,
these furnaces at Rome
were laid open to
the public view
in the dungeons of the
Holy Roman Inquisition,
near the great church
of the Vatican,
still containing
the calcined bones."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: What's
disturbing is that these things
were revealed in 1849, just
six years after Tischendorf
visited the pope.
And it was only revealed because
the great general, Garibaldi,
and his revolutionaries,
captured Rome that year
and opened the papal dungeons.
But then you have a
quote from W.C. Brownlee
that was published in 1843,
the same year Tischendorf
was at the Vatican.
And Brownlee says,
"The Inquisition--
the infernal
inquisition," he says,
"even at this day is in
full operation in Rome
under the patronage of
Pope Gregory Sixteenth."
The same pope that Constantin
von Tischendorf met with.
So while Tischendorf was in Rome
with his cardinal writing him
poetry to praise
him and so on, there
were people-- some of them
quite probably Christians--
who were still being
tortured for heresy
in the underground
inquisition nearby.
And they were being roasted
alive in these ovens
right next door to the Vatican.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Yes, the inquisition--
actually not just in Italy
but in other places--
went well into the 1800's.
NARRATOR: Discoveries of the
Inquisition during this era
were also exposed by
Doctor H. Grattan Guinness,
in the convent of Santo
Domingo, Mexico in 1861.
He published these photographs
of the remains of victims who
had been walled up
and buried alive.
The expressions of
their torment still
recorded in their countenance.
Charles Spurgeon wrote
that "The Inquisition
was the masterpiece of
infernal craft and malice.
There is a deep and indelible
sentence of damnation written
upon the apostate church for its
more than infernal cruelties.
And the curse is
registered in heaven.
Nor can any pretenses
to present liberality
reverse the condemnation.
Its infmay is engraven
in the rock forever."
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Rome did many,
many, many evil
and hateful things.
NARRATOR: Yet somehow,
during this era,
the Protestant Tischendorf
was not only accepted by Rome
but received special
treatment from the Vatican
and her priests.
Tischendorf's cooperation
with the Vatican
was a dramatic departure from
the resistance maintained
by other Protestant
ministers of that era.
Grattan Guinness called Rome
the masterpiece of Satan
and maintained that she had
never repented of her crimes.
In 1873, Charles Spurgeon wrote
that "The superstition of Rome
is the worst of all the evils
which have befallen our race.
May the Lord arise and
sweep it down to the hell
from whence it arose."
Spurgeon was so convicted
against the papacy that he once
declared "Popery is
abhorred of the Lord,
and they who help it wear
the mark of the Beast."
Yet in Rome, Tishcendorf was
not only welcomed by the pope,
but by two of the leading
cardinals at that time.
The first was the well known
linguistic, Mezzofanti,
while the other was a Jesuit
named Cardinal Angelo Mai.
During the 19th century, Mai
was the cardinal librarian
for the Vatican library and
was credited with recovering
many ancient manuscripts that
pertain to church history.
It was said that "There
is not a single century
of the Christian era, from
the second to the seventeenth,
from which he has not
produced important
and previously unknown works.
He had transcribed all with his
own hand entirely by himself."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: This quote
about be Jesuit Cardinal Mai
is very interesting
because it shows
us the nature of the times.
And so you've got
Cardinal Mai there,
who very much like Tischendorf--
Tischendorf is out journeying,
trying to gather all of
these ancient manuscripts--
at the same time,
Cardinal Mai is going
through old Vatican records
and he's producing all
of these works that nobody
had ever seen before,
that have to do with the
history of the Church.
Now what's disturbing
about this,
is that the collective
efforts of both Cardinal
Mai and Tischendorf would
end up dramatically changing
the academic world's view of the
Bible from that time forward.
During the same time that
Tischendorf was discovering
the first manuscript that would
change everyone's perception
about the Greek
text, Cardinal Mai
was in Rome working on
the other manuscript that
would accomplish the same thing.
And that was the Vatican's
version of the Bible,
a codex vaticanus, which today
is considered supreme over
all of the other Greek
biblical manuscripts
anywhere in the world.
VOICE OFFSCREEN: What we have
here is the Vatican manuscript,
also called Codex
B. I have it opened
to a very important section.
And you can see the
Vatican's seal here,
this is an exact facsimile.
NARRATOR: But before
Vaticanus would emerge
to dominate the world
of Biblical scholarship
the travels of Constantine
von Tischendorf
would yield the fruits
of his great ambition.
In his memoirs, he wrote
"It was in April, 1844
that I embarked at
Leghorn for Egypt.
The desire which I felt to
discover some precious remains
of any manuscripts, more
especially Biblical, of a date,
which would carry us back to
the early times of Christianity,
was realized beyond
my expectations.
It was at the foot
of Mount Sinai,
in the convent of
Saint Catherine
that I discovered the
pearl all my researches."
Tischendorf tells of how he
discovered this manuscript
in a trash basket
inside the convent.
The monks had been using its
pages as fuel for the fire.
He wrote "I perceived in
the middle of the great hall
a large and wide basket,
full of old parchments.
And the librarian told me that
two heaps of papers like this
had been already
committed to the flames.
What was my surprise to find
a mid this heap of papers,
a considerable number of sheets
of a copy of the Old Testament
in Greek, which
seemed to me to be one
of the most ancient
that I had ever seen."
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: He's
visiting the monastery in 1844.
And he is under the
patronage, sponsorship,
of Frederick Augustus,
kind of Saxony.
And while he's there, he
discovers an old manuscript
in a rubbish basket
and they were basically
using it as tinder
to start fires.
NARRATOR: According to his own
testimony, once he recogniz
the manuscript for
its ancient value,
Tischendorf responded
quickly and was
able to rescue many of the
pages from being burned.
He wrote "The authorities of the
convent allowed me to possess
myself of a third
of these parchments
as they were destined
for the fire.
But I could not
get them to yield
up possession of the remainder.
The too lively satisfaction
which I had displayed,
had arroused their
suspicions as to the value
of this manuscript."
In total, Tischendorf
recovered some 43 pages.
When he returned
from his journey,
he chose to publish the
pages, but secretly.
He wrote "I did not divulge
the name of the place
where I had found it in
the hopes of returning
and recovering the rest
of the manuscript."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So Tischendorf
published his Old Testament
portion of the Sinai
Codex, but he continued
to believe that
the New Testament
portion of the manuscript
was probably still
somewhere inside St.
Catharine's monastery.
Then he says he
returned again in 1853
and didn't find anything.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: So he
finally goes back in 1859.
He's able to get,
well, the remainder.
NARRATOR: It was during
Tischendorf's third journey
to St. Catharine's
monastery in 1859
that he made his most
famous discovery.
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Tischendorf says
that he was taking a walk
with a Steward of the convent
and that they returned to
his room at some point.
They were talking
about the Septuagint
and he says I, too,
have read a Septuagint,
meaning a Greek version
of the Old Testament.
So then he pulls out this bulky
manuscript, that was supposedly
wrapped in red cloth, and
shows it to Tischendorf.
NARRATOR: Tischendorf wrote,
"I unrolled the cover,
and discovered to my
great surprise not only
those very fragments
which, 15 years before,
I had taken out of
the basket, but also,
other parts of the Old Testament
and the New Testament complete.
I knew that I held
in my hand the most
precious Biblical
treasure in existence.
A document, whose
age and importance
exceeded that of all the
manuscripts which I had ever
examined during 20 years
of study on the subject."
Tischendorf would
transcribe and eventually
publish the manuscript under
the name Codex Sinaiticus.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN: In
relationship to the Sinaiticus
manuscript, it's republished
by Kirsa Blake in the 1800's.
In the Old Testament portion
you can see what appears to be,
even, burn marks on some of
the leaves that were recovered.
VOICE OFFSCREEN:
like he pulled that right
out of the fire, doesn't it?
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Yeah, it does.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Yeah, it does.
See?
See?
VOICE OFFSCREEN: So this
certainly confirms his story,
or it seems to.
That they were throwing
these pages into the flames.
PASTOR DAVID BROWN:
Well they were using it
like we use newspaper
to start a fire.
This was old, it
was brittle, so it
made good to start a fire
there in the cool mornings
and evenings at the monastery.
[APPLAUSE]
[LAUGHTER]
-I'm very thankful,
and grateful,
for this wonderful privilege.
NARRATOR: Once Sinaiticus
was fully published,
Tischendorf became a
world famous scholar,
practically overnight.
Nearly all the courts of
Europe showered honors
and distinctions on him
for his great discovery.
So much so, said his
son-in-law, that they
could not all fit
on one man's chest.
Oxford and Cambridge
universities
honored him with
their highest degrees.
In the midst of all this,
a copy of Sinaiticus
was sent to the pope
who wrote Tischendorf
an autographed letter
congratulating him.
Tischendorf even
mentioned how an old man
of distinguished learning
had said "I would rather
have discovered this Sinaitic
manuscript than the Koh i noor
of the Queen of England."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The Koh i noor
was the famed diamond of India
that was in possession
of the English throne.
And it's interesting
because that's
exactly how Tischendorf
described his manuscript.
As a diamond, he says,
in his possession.
And for him, it was.
NARRATOR: Because of
the Codex Sinaiticus,
Constantin von
Tischendorf would go on
to become one of the most famous
men of the academic world,
and perhaps the most celebrated
palaeographer of all time.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: And it's
an interesting contrast.
On the one hand, you've
got the reformers,
who are being persecuted and
killed by the Church of Rome
because of their faith
in the word of God.
Well on the other hand,
you've got Tischendorf, who's
being lauded by the pope
and celebrated like a prince
upon the earth
for his discovery.
NARRATOR: In the
the scripture says, concerning
the Great Harlot Mystery,
Babylon, that "By thy sorceries
were all nations deceived."
As part of their
Counter Reformation,
the Jesuits created
many fraudulent
and forged documents.
When they could not persuade
others by ordinary means
they would literally
create historic evidence
to support their claims.
Sometimes they dug up
old bones, pretending
that they belonged
to some saint.
And sometimes they
created fake documents.
19th century British
historian, Thomas Carlyle,
said that "Jesuitism
has poisoned
the wellsprings of truth
in the whole world."
Yet long before the
Jesuit order was formed,
Rome herself had
an ancient practice
of fraud and deception.
VOICE OFFSCREEN:
What was the purpose
of creating all these forgeries?
DR. HENRY HUDSON: Well, I
think it was enabling the pope,
the claims-- the papal claims--
to having absolute power.
Anything that could
buttress those claims.
And that's why they came in.
NARRATOR: Perhaps the
most famous forgery
in Rome's long history was
the donation of Constantine,
a document alleging that the
emperor Constantine the Great
gave all the lands of
the Western Roman Empire
to the pope as the
vicar of the Son of God.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: The donation
of Constantine, according
to Renaissance scholars who
first began to expose some
of these documents-- Lawrence
Lavallo for example--
tells us that that
document could not have
been written in
the fourth century.
NARRATOR: Today it is agreed
by Catholic and Protestant
scholars alike that the
donation was a forgery.
Most likely created between the
eighth and ninth century AD.
Developed alongside the
donation, where the Decretals
of Isidore, also known
as the False Decretals.
This elaborate forgery
involved a series of letters
from early figures
in Church history.
From Clement, in
the first century,
to Gregory the Great in the
sixth and seventh century.
The letters filled
more than 700 pages
and were cleverly interwoven
with real historic documents
to give them credibility.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The diabolical
genius of the False Decretals
is that it was truth
mixed with lies.
And it was very
elaborately done.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: If you're
going to the 11th century
when you have Gratian and his
compilation of the cannons,
you'll discover that in
support of papal power,
out of something
like 330 quotations,
313 of those
sources of authority
come from those false,
distorted documents.
DR. RONALD COOKE: The
Jesuits held them back,
but they finally came to view
that many of these documents
were forgeries and
they were forged
specifically to give Rome power.
And so that they would be
looked upon as the true Church
and as the seat of the
papacy and that this
was what the church
had written about
and what the church
supported when
in fact they were all forged.
NARRATOR: The
Decretals of Isidore
became the cornerstone of canon
law during the Middle Ages.
They would be used to deceive
the church for more than 600
years until they were
finally exposed by Calvinous
scholar, David Blondell in 1628.
But the false Decretals and
the donation of Constantine
are said to be just two of the
countless forgeries created
by Rome.
DR. HENRY HUDSON: They're
all basically the same.
They're the same as the Dictatus
Papae of Gregory VII, in which
they are claims made
about papl power.
NARRATOR: Pope Gregory
VII was perhaps
the most notorious
forger ever admitted
to by Catholic historians.
In the 11th century, he
drafted his Dictatus,
or list, of papal privileges.
Among his 27 points, he
declared the following.
"The pope can be judged
by no one on earth.
The Roman church
has never erred,
nor can it err, until
the end of time.
The pope alone can dethrone
emperors and kings,
and absolve their
subjects from allegiance."
And, "All princes are
obliged to kiss his feet."
To support these
ideas, Gregory relied
upon the forged
documents of the past,
but chose to go even farther
and create his own history
for the church and the world.
In the book Vicars of Christ,
former Jesuit priest Peter de
Rosa writes of Pope Gregory
VII and his school of forgers.
He says, "For seven
centuries, the Greeks
had called Rome the
home of forgeries.
Whenever they tried
talking with Rome,
the popes brought
out forged documents
which the Greeks,
naturally, had never seen."
De Rosa says "Gregory went
way beyond the Donation
of Constantine.
He had a whole school of forgers
under his very nose turning out
document after document, with
the papal seal of approval
to cater for his every need.
"Pope Gregory might
require justification
for some action against
a prince or bishop.
Very well, these
prelates literally
produced the
appropriate document.
No need for research, it was
all done on the premises.
Many earlier documents
were touched up,
to make them say the opposite
of what they said originally.
Some of these earlier documents
were themselves forgeries.
This instant method
of inventing history
was marvelously successful,
especially as the forgeries
were at once inserted
into canon law.
Thus was accomplished
the quietest and longest
lasting of all revolutions.
It was all done on paper.
DR. RONALD COOKE: They
propagated deceptions early on.
And I believe those
deceptions continue
right up into the 20th century.
NARRATOR: Evidence that
Rome continued her forgeries
into modern times
can be shown in
the late 19th and
early 20th centuries.
In 1873, Charles
Spurgeon documented
how the relic department
of the Vatican
had been exposed for
manufacturing false relics
and presenting them as the
bones of various saints of old.
We read that "so far back as
1828, this trade was going on.
With pieces of bones of sheep,
and hares, or of human bones
taken from the
catacombs, but such as
were probably those of pagans.
Certainly not of
saints and martyrs,
whose names they
affixed to them."
Spurgeon went on to say
that "The Jesuits play
a prominent part in
these transactions,
as they do in most
Catholic affairs."
Then, in the 20th century, it
appears that Jesuit deception
played a role in
the 1912 discovery
of the Piltdown Man, which
was declared to be the missing
link that would prove
Darwin's Theory of Evolution.
But 40 years after
its discovery,
Piltdown was proven
to be a hoax.
The chief culprit
in the deception
was said to be Charles
Dawson, an amateur British
archaeologist who
sought fame and glory.
Yet Dawson did not work alone.
His helper was a Jesuit priest
named Teilhard de Chardin.
In 1980, Harvard Professor
Stephen Jay Gould
would publish his belief
that Teilhard himself was
a co-conspirator
with Dawson, who
helped him create
the Piltdown hoax.
Yet another Jesuit trained
priest, named George Lemaitre,
would further these
ideas and develop
the Big Bang theory in 1931.
It might be said that no
doctrine has been more
devastating to
faith in the Bible
than Darwin's
Theory of Evolution.
But was it only coincidence
that Charles Darwin himself
published Origin of the
Species in 1859, the same year
that Tischendorf discovered
Codex Sinaiticus?
Just as La Peyrere's theory
about men before Adam
worked together with Richard
Simon's historic criticism,
so Darwin's theory of evolution
would work alongside Codex
Sinaiticus to destroy the
faith of countless millions
in the scripture as the inspired
and inerrant word of God.
It's important to consider that
from the period of 1828 to 1912
it can be shown that the
Vatican and her Jesuit priests
were involved in
fakery and forgery.
This is significant because
this time frame includes
the same period that Tischendorf
was working with Rome.
After Tischendorf revealed
his Codex Sinaiticus
he was hailed as a great
scholar and greeted
with laudation across Europe.
-(LAUGHING) Oh,
cheers my good friend.
NARRATOR: But shortly after
the work was published
it was challenged by a
prominent expert in paleography.
His name was
Constantine Simonides.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Constantine
Simonides is undoubtedly
the forgotten link in the
history of Codex Sinaiticus.
And it's because he waged
an open and a public debate
against Tischendorf
for about four years,
arguing that Codex Sinaiticus
was not an ancient manuscript.
And the more you
study Simonides you
realize that he was a very
important figure at that time.
NARRATOR: Alexander
Von Humboldt declared
that Simonides was an enigma.
Others believed
his understanding
of ancient languages
to be ingenious.
A 19th century
publication said of him
"Dr. Simonides is
a Greek by birth
and he speaks and writes
the classic language
of his forefathers with
fluency, purity, and elegance."
From his uncle, "Simonides
thoroughly acquired
the art of paleography and
became so great a proficient
therein that few surpass him
either in the practice of it,
or in the diagnosis
of manuscripts."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
Simonides had quite
a reputation in
the 19th century.
On the one hand, he was
a respected paleographer.
But on the other hand, he had
kind of a cloak and dagger
history and was looked upon as
sort of a Greek Indiana Jones.
Involved not only with
ancient manuscripts
but also fighting battles
as a Greek patriot
against the Ottoman
Turkish empire.
Which is an important part
of understanding who he was.
-Come, my brother, we shall
avenge the blood of our fathers
on this Turkish invader.
Let us be strong in our
weakness and with God's help,
we shall prevail.
[CHEERING CROWD]
[GUN SHOT]
NARRATOR: One of the
newspapers of the time
reported that "the
escapades of Mr. Simonides
extend over nearly 20 years.
In Alexandria, he contrived
to quarrel with some Arabs.
Pistolled two of them,
received some ugly wounds
on the head and
face from a third.
In Macedonia, his
native country,
he succeeded in getting
up a little insurrection
among his countrymen,
who joined him
in the leadership of
the patriot bands.
He fell on a detachment
of Turkish soldiers,
drove them into a river, and
destroyed some 150 of them."
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
These are the kinds
of stories recorded
about Simonides.
As a Greek patriot who was
still fighting against the Turks
in a conflict that dated
all the way back to the fall
of Constantinople in
1453, when the Turks
invaded the ancient capital
of the Greek Orthodox empire.
In the 19th century, the Greeks
remembered Constantinople
as if it had just
happened the day before.
-Constantinople
will be ours again.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Simonides
was apparently involved
in continued battles
with the Turks
and controversies against the
Latinizers, or Roman Catholics,
as he called them.
Because both the Turks
and the Catholic Church
had fought against the
Greek Orthodox kingdom.
And so, for Sinonides, the
Turks and the Catholics
were both ancient enemies.
And this conflict with
Rome in particular
would have everything to
do with his controversy
against Tischendorf.
And then as a scholar,
Simonides was equally
in the thick of debates
about ancient manuscripts.
He had presented his
work before kings,
nobles, foreign
ministers, diplomats.
He'd sold a number
of manuscripts
to the British Museum, and
other prominent institutions
in Europe.
So he was involved
in the highest levels
of the academic
world at that time.
NARRATOR: Simonides owned a
collection of more than 5,000
ancient manuscripts
that he had partly
inherited from his uncle.
As he traveled across Europe
he presented these works
at libraries and universities.
Their content often
sparked intense debate.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: Simonides'
debates usually centered
around the understanding
of ancient languages.
And he generally believed
that his own knowledge
was superior to
those around him,
although he did not have a
reputation for arrogance.
But while he was in Germany,
he got into a vicious conflict
with the scholars at the
University of Leipzig.
And it was there in
1855 that he made
enemies with Von Tischendorf.
So now, years later, when he
comes forward and questions
Codex Sinaiticus,
he does so as
Tischendorf's old nemesis.
NARRATOR: Simonides claimed
that Codex Sinaiticus was
no ancient manuscript at all,
but a modern work created
by himself and two
other Greeks in 1840.
-[LAUGHTER]
NARRATOR: While Tischendorf
was in the midst of enjoying
his fame, the story
of Simonides began
to be published in
the London newspapers.
-Simonides.
NARRATOR: Needless to say,
Tischendorf was furious.
-Idiot.
NARRATOR: What followed
would be a public debate that
would continue in
a variety of London
newspapers for the
next two years.
In July of 1861, a publication
called the Literary Gazette
reported that "We understand
that in literary circles,
a rumor prevails that the
manuscript now publishing
by the Russian government,
under the direction of M.
Tischendorf, purporting
to be a manuscript
Bible of the fourth century
is not an ancient manuscript
but is an entirely modern
production, written
by a gentleman now alive, who
will shortly take measures
to establish his claim
to the authorship.
The manuscript is known
as the Codex Sinaiticus,
and has attracted a large amount
of attention throughout Europe.
Should the rumor prove to be
correct, as we believe it will,
the disclosures
that will follow,
must be of the greatest
interest to archaeology."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: In
his letters, Simonides
says that the controversy
began over Codex Sinaiticus
when he first saw the
manuscript in Liverpool in 1860.
And then it was
the following year
that the newspapers
got hold of the story.
So this story first
appears in 1861.
But Simonides did not
publish his side of the story
until 1862.
The only reason he did so
is because he was drawn
in to the conflict by two
of the prominent scholars
at that time.
NARRATOR: The two
scholars in question
were Samuel P. Tregelles,
and Fenton John Anthony Hort.
Fragellis and Hort believed
Sinaiticus to be real
and took sides against
Simonides almost immediately.
Fragellis wrote that
"the story of Simonides
was as false and
absurd as possible."
In response, Simonides defended
his argument, as published
in The Guardian newspaper,
in September of 1862.
Where he said "When
about two years ago, I
saw the first facsimiles of
Tischendorf, which were put
into my hand at Liverpool by
Mr. Newton, a friend of Dr.
Tregelles.
I at once recognized
my own work,
as I immediately told him."
In the book Codex Sinaiticus
and the Simonides Affair,
author JK Elliot confirms
that Simonides spoke
of his authorship to a man
named JE Hodgkin in 1860,
and in a letter to Sir Thomas
Phillips on August 2, 1861.
Simonides claimed that the
manuscript had not been created
with any intention to deceive
but was intended by himself
and his uncle as a gift to Czar
Nicholas the First of Russia.
To prove his claims,
Simonides challenged
Tischendorf to a public debate.
Yet Tischendorf
refused to take part.
About this, Simonides wrote "The
real test of the genuineness
of the Codex Sinaiticus
is neglected.
The public were assured
that in May, Tischendorf
was to be in London,
armed with a portion
at least of his great codex.
I have waited in England,
hoping to have the opportunity
of meeting him, face to
face, to prove him in error.
But May has come and gone, and
the discover has not appeared.
Let the favourers of the
antiquity of the manuscript
persuade him to come at
once, and brave the ordeal,
or else forever hold his peace."
Yet despite the
evasiveness of Tischendorf,
most of the
newspapers in England
defended him and denounced
Simonides as a fraud.
The attacks were
almost fanatical
and often unreasonable.
Could Tischendorf's
relationship with Rome
have had something
to do with it?
During this same era,
Protestant historian JA Wiley
wrote about the Jesuit's
influence in English media.
In his book on the Jesuit's
morals, maxims, and plots,
he said that "There are two
institutions in especial
to which the Jesuits
will lay siege.
These are the press
and the pulpit.
The press of Great Britain is
already manipulated by them
to an extent of which the
public but little dream.
The whole English press of
the world is supervised,
and the word is passed
round how writers, speakers,
and causes are to be handled.
And applause for
condemnation dealt out
just as it may accord with the
interests and wishes of Rome."
Yet Simonides was not
without his supporters.
Another paper, called
The Literary Churchman,
questioned the antiquity
of Codex Sinaiticus
and argued that Simonides
should be heard.
They said, "For
ourselves, we must
profess entire impartiality.
Though we were quite ready
from the first to admit
the importance of the discovery
of Tischendorf we are not
prepared, at this moment, to
say, with the Dr. Tregelles,
that the statements of Simonides
are 'as false and absurd
as possible.' Tischendorf
applies these terms,
false and absurd, just
now to Tregelles himself."
The reason Tischendorf attacked
Tregelles was because he
disagreed with him about the
writing of Codex Sinaiticus.
Tregelles said, "On one
point, I believe that I differ
materially from Tischendorf,
as to the writing
of the manuscript.
He thinks that he sees
traces of various hands
having been employed in such
a way that a change of writer
must have frequently
taken place.
I believe that the difference is
to be attributed to the scribe
having more or less
ink in his style,
the ink being more
or less thick,
and the surface of the
vellum slightly varying."
In other words, the scribe dips
his stylus into an ink well.
And when he first
begins to write,
there's a lot of ink on it.
But sooner or later
the ink runs thin.
In places where
the ink ran thin,
Tischendorf believed that this
signified a change of writers,
and hence the passage of time.
Tregelles, on the
other hand, believed
that it was the
same scribe, it's
just that he sometimes
ran low on ink.
That was the difference.
But when you factor in that
Tischendorf spreads his scribes
and correctors from the
fourth century all the way
to the seventh century,
a span of some 300 years,
you're left wondering
just how precise
the scientific methods
were that they employed.
Also, consider that
similar contentions
are made about
ancient bones that
are dug up out of the ground.
Where the scientists
tell us that these
are millions of years
old and so forth.
Do they really have the
ability to date bones that way?
And did Tischendorf
really have the ability
to date ancient manuscripts?
After the initial attacks
against him began,
Simonides asserted that
these scholars, in reality,
knew little or nothing
about ancient manuscripts.
In response to one
of his critics,
he wrote, "Neither
you nor Tischendorf
possess the true knowledge
of paleographical science.
You have only learned to say
at random this is genuine,
and this is spurious.
But you do not know the reason."
This comment might be brushed
aside but for the often
repeated testimony
that Simonides exceeded
his contemporaries
in the expertise
of manuscript evidence.
James Farrer, in his 1907
book on literary forgeries
wrote that "Tischendorf was
only the senior of Simonides
by five years and in the
science of paleography
had neither his knowledge
nor his experience."
Another scholar, whose
testimony was chiefly regarded,
was Henry Bradshaw,
keeper of manuscripts
at the Cambridge
University library.
Bradshaw sided with Tischendorf.
And once this was
known, he was confronted
in person by Simonides.
In a letter describing the
encounter, Bradshaw wrote,
"Dr. Simonides wrote to me,
to convince me and my friends
that it was quite
possible for him
to have written the
volume in question.
He had invited some of
us to Christ's College
to discuss matters fairly.
He could speak and understand
English pretty well
but his friend was with him
to interpret and explain.
They really seemed to believe
that all people in the West
were is ignorant of Greek
as the Greeks are of Latin.
But the great question was,
how do you satisfy yourselves
of the genuineness
of any manuscript?
I first replied that it was
really difficult to define.
That it seemed to be more a kind
of instinct than anything else.
Dr. Simonides and his
friend readily caught
at this as too much
like vague assertion
and they naturally
ridiculed any such idea.
But I further said
that I had lived
for six years past in the
constant, almost daily
habit of examining manuscripts."
Bradshaw then applied
this principle
to his opinion of
Codex Sinaiticus.
When Simonides
objected, Bradshaw said,
"I told him, as
politely as I could,
that I was not to be
convinced against the evidence
of my senses."
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So Bradshaw
essentially admitted
that there was no
real scientific proof
as to the age of
Codex Sinaiticus.
And he ultimately admitted
that all he trusted in
were his senses,
or his instincts,
about the manuscript.
And Bradshaw is very significant
because it was his reputation
as a scholar that
really compelled
people to embrace
Tischendorf's Codex.
NARRATOR: Bradshaw
further said that "Dr.
Simonides always
maintained that Mt.
Athos Bible, meaning Codex
Sinaiticus, written in 1840
for the emperor of Russia was
not meant to deceive anyone.
That it was professor
Tischendorf's ignorance
and inexperience which
rendered him so easily
deceived where no
deception was intended."
Mount Athos was the
location where Simonides
claimed he had
created the Codex.
He provided many details for how
the manuscript had been written
and how it came to
be at Mount Sinai.
He also provided many names of
those in the Greek world, who
he said could confirm that
he created the manuscript.
But strangely, most
of these details
were never investigated
either by the supporters
of Tischendorf or by the
newspapers of the time.
In 1907, James Farrer wrote that
the controversy "cannot be said
to have been settled by the mere
opinions Tregelles or Bradshaw,
who examined the codex two
months before Simonides had
made his claim to
it as his work,
so that they had no reason to
examine it with suspicion."
But could there have
been some other motive
that drove the critical
scholars at this time?
Simonides was a real threat
to the academic establishment
of Western Europe.
If what he claimed was
true, it would have shown
that Tregelles, Bradshaw,
Hort, and Tischendorf
knew little or nothing
about dating ancient texts.
So you can imagine how hard
they fought to discredit him.
Not only that, but Simonides
was working at the time
with a man named
Joseph Mayer, who
was the founder of the
Maery Museum in Liverpool.
And while there, Mr. Mayer had
him come and examine a series
of ancient Egyptian scrolls that
he had purchased years before.
So Mr. Mayer brings
Simonides to the museum
and what he uncovered were
first century fragments
and parchments that shattered
some of the claims that were
being made by the
higher critics.
He found a first
century fragment
of the Gospel of
Matthew that was dated
within 15 years of the
ascension of Christ.
And this proved that Matthew
was the first gospel, not Mark,
and that it was originally
written in Greek, not in Hebrew
or Aramaic as the
critics had speculated.
Also, he displayed a
first century scroll
that contained 1 John 5:7,
the Johannine Comma, which
is a hotly disputed verse
among higher critics.
And this proved
that they were wrong
and that the verse was not
invented in later centuries,
as they had been saying.
And this was on display
at Cambridge University
and then at the Royal
Society in London.
And if you read the
accounts, these things
were so controversial that
some later historians tried
to claim that Simonides had
sold this scroll of the Gospel
of Matthew to Mr. Mayer as some
kind of forgery or something.
But if you read the newspaper
accounts, it's very clear.
Mr. Mayer acknowledged
that, in fact, he
had purchased the
scroll years before he
ever met Constantine Simonides.
So there was a lot of propaganda
and false accusation that
came against Simonides because
these discoveries were so
threatening to what the
critics wanted to believe.
In December of 1862,
the London review
wrote that "The few
believers in Simonides
represented him as a man whose
towering genius had aroused
the envy, alike of Grecian
professors, German students,
and English librarians,
and banded them together
in a conspiracy to crush him."
In December of
1862, a publication
called The Brighton Observer
reported that "Professor
Tischendorf having visited the
Holy Land, returned to Europe
with a voluminous
manuscript that he obtained
from the library of the
monastery of Mount Sinai.
The earliest known
copy of the Bible.
In time one of the parts fell
into the hands of Simonides,
who at once recognized
it as a manuscript
he had himself executed.
He made his assertion
public that the Codex
Sinaiticus had been
written by himself.
But Tischendorf and the
learned men of Germany
refused to recognize
the claims of Simonides
and continued its publication.
Things went on this way, some
persons believing Simonides,
some Tischendorf, when suddenly
a Greek Archimandrite wrote
to the English papers from
Alexandria, corroborating
the statement of Simonides."
And stating that he
remembered seeing Simonides
engaged in writing out
the copy of the Bible
in question in the ancient
Greek characters on Mount Athos.
The Greek monk
mentioned in the article
was a friend of Simonides
whose name was Kallinikos.
Kallinikos wrote a
series of letters
to the English
newspapers confirming
the story of Simonides and
denouncing Tischendorf, whom he
called "The master and pupil of
all guile, and all wickedness."
In one of his letters, published
in The Literary Churchmen,
Kallinikos wrote "I repeat
that the manuscript in dispute
is the work of the
unwearied Simonides,
and of no other person.
A portion of this was secretly
removed from Mount Sinai,
by Professor
Tischendorf, in 1844.
The rest, with
inconceivable recklesness,
he mutilated and tampered
with, according to his liking,
in the year 1859.
Some leaves he
destroyed, especially
such as contained the
Acrostics of Simonides."
What's interesting is
Kallinikos' mentioned
of how Tischendorf
destroyed the pages that
had the markings of
Simonides on them.
Which may explain why some
of the pages were burned.
NARRATOR: It's important to
remember that to this day
the monks at Mount Sinai
deny Tischendorf's story
and his claim that he found the
manuscript in a rubbish basket.
So where would the burned
pages of the manuscript
have come from?
Is it possible that Tischendorf
burned parts of them
to destroy the
markings of Simonides
as Kallinikos suggests?
And this might
explain why he came up
with a story about
the monks throwing
the pages into
the fire later on.
A story which nobody
really seems to believe.
Kallinikos claimed
that he himself
had been at St.
Catharine's monastery
when Tischendorf was there
and that Tischendorf took the
first pages of the manuscript
without permission.
He said, "I further declare that
the Codex which Dr. Tischendorf
obtained is the identical codex
which Simonides wrote inasmuch
as I saw it in the
hands of Tischendorf
and recognized the work."
Kallinikos also claimed that
the manuscript had been washed
with lemon juice and herbs
to weaken the appearance
of the letters and to give
it a more ancient look.
In response to these accusations
the supporters of Tischendorf
insisted that Simonides had
forged the letters themselves,
and they claimed that Kallinikos
was a fictional character.
Yet in his book, James Ferrar
tells us that Kallinikos was
indeed a real person and that
his letters cannot be brushed
aside as the testimony
of a fabulous being.
Yet the letters of
Kallinikos bear within them
an almost prophetic
warning about the codex.
He wrote to the
newspapers in 1862
that "you will greatly sin
in foisting on the world
a new manuscript as an old one.
And especially a manuscript
containing the Holy Scriptures.
Injury to the church must
accrue from all this,
even from the evidently numerous
corrections of the manuscript.
Tischendorf
originally documented
some 14,800 corrections.
Today, the Codex
Sinaiticus has its home
at the British
Library in London.
In 2009, they finished the
Codex Sinaiticus Project
which was aimed
at fully examining
Tischendorf's famous manuscript.
In 2008, we interviewed
Doctor Juan Garces,
one of the curators
of the project,
while the work was
still in progress.
-Part of the Codex
Sinaiticus Project
is to gather all the material,
commission top scholars,
to go through that material
and provide reports.
To sit around a table and
discuss it and publish it all.
First of all the
documents, but also
the history.
The great historical
account of how
it came from St.
Catharine's monastery.
I think the great
role of this project
is to produce this
history, which hasn't been
written, as we all
agree, well enough.
So I hope in 2009, July, we will
be able to tell the full story.
INTERVIEWER (OFFSCREEN):
Is there any truth
to the assertion that
Von Tischendorf found
the first manuscript
in a trash barrell?
-He said in his book that
he found it in a basket.
But, again, this is
one of the many voices
that make the whole
of the history.
And I'm in no
position to confirm
that as being probable or not.
NARRATOR: While we were
suspicious of this answer when
we heard it, we chose to
wait until they finished
their research before
jumping to a conclusion.
Yet incredibly, once the
British Library published
their website, we found
that they omitted most all
of the documented history
about Codex Sinaiticus.
They ignored Tischendorf's
own testimony
about finding the manuscript
in a rubbish basket.
Instead, they claim
that the monks
brought it to his
attention in 1844.
And while they said they were
going to tell the full story,
their website makes no mention
of the four year controversy
with Constantine Simonides.
We also spoke with Doctor Scott
McKendrick, the head of Western
Manuscripts, about
the comparison
between Sinaiticus and
the Codex Vaticanus.
-They're different also
in one critical way,
in that Sinaiticus-- or two
ways, actually, I should say.
Two ways.
One is that Vaticanus does not
have the extent of correction.
That's a very
critical difference.
Sinaiticus is the most corrected
manuscript, Greek manuscript,
of the scriptures.
The second is that Vaticanus now
has a very strange appearance.
When you look at it,
as a manuscript expert,
although you know
that people tell you
that it's a fourth
century manuscript,
it actually looks like a
fifteenth century manuscript.
And there's one very
simple reason for that.
Is that, almost the entire
text has been overwritten
by a fifteenth century scribe.
Not only that, he's added in
fifteenth century decoration,
titling, and so forth.
So it has a very
strange appearance.
NARRATOR: Is it possible that
the reason Codex Vaticanus has
a strange and even
newer appearance
is that it may not be a
truly ancient manuscript?
The earliest recorded
date for Vaticanus
is 1475 AD, when it
was first entered
into the record of
the Vatican Library.
The manuscript had formerly
been rejected by Erasmus
and the reformers because
they believed it was corrupt.
Yet somehow, the warnings
of the Reformation
were completely
ignored by Tischendorf
and the scholars
who supported him.
They all embraced Vaticanus
without questioning
its authenticity
or considering that
it may have been
one of Rome's many
historic forgeries.
Among this company of
scholars was FHA Scrivener,
another prominent
academic who also
opposed Constantine Simonides.
CHRISTIAN PINTO:
The strange thing
about all of these guys,
Bradshaw, Scribner, Tregelles,
Hort, all of them who supported
Codex Vaticanus and who
questioned
Constantine Simonides.
It's understandable that
they would question Simonides
because he had been
accused of forgery.
That makes sense.
That they would take the time
to investigate his claims.
But why they did not apply the
same standard to the Vatican--
when the Vatican has a much
longer and much more provable
history of forgery
and fakery and fraud--
why they didn't apply the
same standard when they were
examining Codex Vaticanus
just doesn't make any sense.
And in fact if you study
what happened when Tregelles,
for example, when he goes
to the Vatican library
to examine Codex
Vaticanus, the priest there
behaved in a very
strange manner.
And he said while he
was looking at the Codex
there were priests in the room
and they were making noise
and so on to try
and distract him.
And he said that if he spent
too much time looking at any one
page, for too long
and studying it,
they would come to and it away.
Almost as though
they didn't want
him to have an opportunity
to study it too closely.
NARRATOR: Among the more
startling features of Vaticanus
are its many omissions.
-In the Gospels
alone it leaves out
237 words, 452 clauses
and 748 whole sentences.
And other manuscripts agree
that those things are there.
NARRATOR: While Vaticanus
is known for its omissions,
Sinaiticus is famous for it's
more than 14,000 corrections.
Many more than the
average biblical codex.
While Tischendorf reported
some 14,800 corrections,
once the British library's
project was complete,
the number was
inflated dramatically.
In this BBC documentary the
latest number of corrections
is given by Doctor McKendrick
along with the theological
conclusions they
are said to imply.
-On closer inspection, the
text of the Codex Sinaiticus
is littered with revisions.
It is history's most
altered Biblical manuscript
and within those changes lie
it's real theological secrets.
-It has approximately
23,000 corrections
in all that survives, which
is an extraordinary rate
of correction.
It means that on
average there are
about 30 corrections
on each page.
-Given the quality
of the calligraphy,
scholars was surprised
to find so many changes.
Many scribes wrote for money.
They wrote quickly, which meant
they sometimes made errors.
But 23,000 corrections can't
be explained in this way.
There have to be
theological reasons too.
If the Biblical
text could vary, it
couldn't be the
immutible word of God.
What the Codex
Sinaiticus was revealing
was the instability
of the story.
-This volume is the
oldest surviving copy
of the New Testament, complete.
This is the ancestor
of all the Bibles
that everybody else
has in the world.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: So
right there notice
the conclusion that
the BBC is giving.
They're saying that if this
oldest Bible, supposedly,
had all these mistakes
and variance in it,
then that proves it
cannot be the immutable,
inerrant word of God, hence
confirming what the Jesuits,
and the Vatican, and all
the Catholic scholars,
and the higher critics had been
arguing for hundreds of years
in their attempts to
destroy the process
of doctrine of Sola Scriptura.
NARRATOR: This same BBC
documentary even goes on
to show how the influence
of Codex Sinaiticus
would specifically undermine
the Protestant faith
in the King James Bible.
-Here was a manuscript that
offered unique insights
into scripture and which made
scholars re-evaluate evaluate
the Bible that Victorian
Christians had relied on.
-The King James Bible, sturdy
and black on the shelves
was thought to be perfect
inerrant by many people
across the English
speaking world, which
was mostly Bible
believing Protestants.
But the fact of the matter
was that scholars had known
that the translations
were all based
on rather shaky
evidence, shaky texts.
So this is what drove Von
Tischendorf to go and search
across the ancient
Scriptorius, they were called.
DR. SCOT MCKENDRICK: When the
manuscript was first discovered
in 1844, this met exactly what
Tischendorf was looking for.
In other words, a very early
manuscript of the Christian
Bible.
And in particular, of course,
what he subsequently found
was the earliest
complete New Testament.
NARRATOR: But is Codex
Sinaiticus really
the earliest copy of
the New Testament?
Or is it a 19th
century work created
by Constantine Simonides?
A work that was somehow
tampered with and manipulated
to fulfill a
centuries old agenda?
After presenting many
names, dates, and places
to the scholars
of Western Europe,
Simonides himself seemed to
grow weary of the debates.
At one point he wrote "What
then have you to oppose
to the evidence of
living men, O zealous
defender of the
pseudo-Sinaitic Codex?
If you are still
incredulous, I say to you,
remain faithful in
your faithlessness.
I have proclaimed the truth,
for I will answer as I should
to the All-Seeing God
in the day of judgment.
Therefore, I have
spoken, I have no sin.
Wholly yours,
Constantine Simonides."
Simonides would publish
a final work in 1864
before leaving England for good.
In it, he reaffirmed his
claims about Sinaiticus
and included the testimonies
of those who believed him.
Yet and his enemies
in the press continued
to insist that he was
merely a liar and a forger.
The charge of forgery was
never proven against Simonides,
but can be traced to his initial
conflict with Tischendorf
at the University
of Leipzig in 1855
when Simonides presented
the first known copy
of the Shepherd of
Hermas in Greek.
CHRISTIAN PINTO: The reason
the Shepherd of Hermas
is important is because
it's a work that
was embraced by
the early church.
But in Western Europe, it
was only known in Latin.
And yet scholars
knew that it had
originally been
written in Greek.
But nobody had ever
found a copy in Greek.
Constantine Simonides
was the first man
to bring a Greek copy of
the Shepherd of Hermas
into Western Europe.
And that's very important
because the Shepherd of Hermas
is also found as part
of Codex Sinaiticus.
And this supports
the idea that he
could have created
Codex Sinaiticus.
Why?
Because he had access to a Greek
copy of the Shepherd of Hermas.
And he's the only
person in the world who
had a copy of the Greek version
of the Shepherd of Hermas.
That's why it's so significant.
NARRATOR: While most of
the scholars at Leipzig
embraced the Hermas
manuscript as genuine,
Tischendorf declared it
to be a forgery because it
disagreed with
the Latin version.
In response, Simonides argued
that "the manuscript Herams was
correct and that common Latin
translations from which it
different had been
made not in accordance
with the Greek
originals but to suit
the views of the Latin
translators who had put
into the mouth of Hermas
doctrinal opinions
eminently calculated to
strengthen the position
of the Catholic Church to which
the translators belonged."
Simonides' biographer wrote that
"as some of the chief dogmas
of the Latin Church
were severely attacked
by an exposure of the fraud
in the Latin translations,
Simonides gained much
ill-will among the members
of that church."
-This cannot be right.
This is a forgery.
NARRATOR: The charge
of forgery would
be exaggerated in the
English press to the point
that Simonides would eventually
be accused of forging nearly
everything he came
in contact with.
He is said to have left
England about 1864.
But then in 1870,
a number of the men
who opposed him would become
involved in the new revision
committee for the
King James Bible.
The committee was led by Fenton
John Anthony Hort, the friend
of Tregelles who
was among the first
to embrace the Codex Sinaiticus.
Under his leadership,
the committee
would create a new Greek
text in fulfillment
of what Tischendorf
had written in 1866.
They used as their
foundation Codex
Vaticanus and the
Codex Sinaiticus.
-It was an entirely
new Greek text.
It was different from
anything that existed before.
NARRATOR: Hort seems
to have been motivated
by a hatred for the traditional
Greek of the Reformation.
He referred to it as villainous
and as "that vile Textus
Receptus."
His partner was an Anglican
bishop named BF Wescott.
Other committee members
included Tregelles,
along with FHA Scribener.
It is interesting to note that
the committee also invited John
Henry Newman, who was at
the time, a Catholic priest.
And while he declined the
offer, their invitation
reveals much about the
theological opinions
of Wescott and Hort.
DR. RONALD COOKE: You know,
there's definite links
to Roman Catholicism there
in the different Bibles.
Wescott and Hort, they were
definitely
Anglp-Catholics at best.
INTERVIEWER (OFFSCREEN):
So you would
call Wescott and
Hort Anglo-Catholics?
DR. RONALD COOKE:
Yeah, I would think
that you would have
to class them as that.
You have your whole
Tractarian movement
going on at that time
in the Anglican church.
And that was the Anglo-Catholic
movement by John Henry Newman,
who later became a cardinal
in the Roman Catholic Church.
But he was in the Anglican
church at that time and John
Keeble, and Stride, and
many of the other writers,
they were all working to make
Anglicanism Roman Catholic.
They wanted to
introduce many Roman
Catholic practices
into Angilcanism.
And about 200 Anglicans
converted to Roman Catholicism
at that time, and
thousands of members.
So neither are but 1,000
and Anglican ministers
ready to convert to Roman in
the year of our lord, 2011.
So the whole
Anglo-Catholic movement
has been going on in England.
And out of that, in
Wescott and Hort,
they really were in the
midst of all that furor
about introducing Roman Catholic
ideas into the Anglican church.
-Wescott and Hort
in their letters,
they're very pro-Catholic.
NARRATOR: At one point, Wescott
described seeing a Pietta
statue of the Catholic Mary
holding the dead body of Jesus.
He wrote "had I
been alone, I could
have knelt there for hours."
-And Hort said that there's
no difference between Jesus
worship and Mary worship
in it's causes and effects.
So there's a very strong
Catholic thing there,
as it was with the
American committee.
With Phillip Shaff.
He was very supportive
of Catholicism.
NARRATOR: Philip Shaff would
lead the committee that
would develop the American
standard version of the Bible
in 1901, based on
the same Greek text
created by Wescott and Hort.
Like Tischendorf, Shaff met
privately with Pope Gregory
the 16th and even admitted
to kissing his red slipper.
Shaff would become known as the
ecumenical profit who claimed
he was promoting the
germs of a new theology.
LES GARRETT: We know he was
hitting with all of that
because he was one of
the founders of the World
Parliament of Religion that had
their first meeting in 1893.
And the speakers at that were
from all sorts of religions.
They were from Buddhists,
Buddhism, Hinduism,
these were all the
speakers that spoke.
Shintoism, the bishop of
Japan spoke on Shintoism.
And the subjects that they
covered was quite amazing.
And so there was a
mixture of Islam,
there was a Muslim speaker, and
Christian Science, and New Age.
Annie Passat was
the opening speaker,
who was a co-author of the
magazine called Lucifer, which
was a part of the
society's publication.
So there was a real strong
root and connection there.
NARRATOR: During these
events , the Lord's Prayer
was retitled the
Universal Prayer.
Their motto was have
we not all one father?
Hath not one God created us?
If you read the historic
account of the Parliament
there's no question that
there was a very strong focus
on Christianity and the Bible.
But the idea was that
Christ was inclusive.
And so rather than
calling for all those
who worshiped idols to repent,
as Paul when he witnessed
to the Athenians, the
Parliament determined
that all the pagan
religions should be embraced
and intermingled
with Christianity.
Strangely, the subject
of Phillip Shaff's speech
was the reunion of Christendom.
In it, he said "There is a
unity of Christian scholarship
of all creeds.
This unity has been
strikingly illustrated
in the Anglo American revision
of the authorized version
of the scriptures"
Was Shaff somehow suggesting
that the revision committee
of 1870 was part of
a greater agenda?
It is worth considering that
when Wescott and Hort finished
their revision of
the King James Bible,
their new Greek text was openly
condemned by Dean John Bergen,
who published a critique
titled The Revision Revised.
In it he said "I frankly confess
that to me all this looks very
much indeed like what, in
the language of lawyers,
is called conspiracy."
-Do you believe that
the Jesuit's Counter
Reformation is going
on still today?
DR. RONALD COOKE: Oh yeah.
I believe that that's one of
the main efforts of the Church
of Rome to undo the work of
the Protestant Reformation.
I think the Jesuits, they
have been in the forefront
of the battle and
they were so evil
that the popes finally
disbanded them.
The first pope that was
going to do that was poisoned
and the second pope, he said
that they would probably
get him too, and he was also,
after he signed the bill
to suppress the order,
he suffered a long time
in agony from the
poison that he got.
But then they were reintroduced
again by the church
and so they're
still working today.
They've changed their
tactics I believe
to work in the
ecumenical movement.
In the 20th century, the
Vatican would take the concept
of ecumenical community
to a global level
through Vatican Council II,
which redefined the position
of Rome on all the
religions of the world.
But exactly what role will
the revision of the Bible
play in this new movement?
At the world parliament
in 1893, Philip Schaff
said, "Christ
promised us one flock
under one shepherd,
but not one fold.
The famous passage, John
10:16, has been mistranslated--
And the error has passed into
the King James's version.
Christ flock is one, but
there are many folds.
We must look therefore
to a much broader union."
In the scripture, Jesus said,
"I am the way, the truth,
and the life: no man cometh
unto the Father, but by me."
While the apostle
Peter declared,
"Neither is there
salvation in any other.
For there is none other
name under heaven given
among men whereby
we must be saved."
Meanwhile, the apostle
Paul warned the church
when he said, "If any man
preach any other gospel--
let him be accursed.
Yet, if men could believe that
the earliest New Testament
manuscripts were full of errors,
and that early Christians were
unsure of what to
believe, then it
could be possible that such
bold verses in the scripture
are not so decisive after all.
And hence, the door to many
religions could thus be opened.
Is this perhaps what
Rome desired all along?
Many examples might be given
for the influence of Rome
in modern times.
But among the more interesting
is an interview with Leo
Hindery, the managing partner
of Intermedia Partners.
His company took
possession of the largest
Christian publishing
house in the world,
Thomas Nelson Publishers.
In this interview,
Hindery was asked
about what drove him
to be successful.
-What gave you the ambition
to go from you know,
sort of blue collar jobs
to wanting to become I
guess a business man.
-Lots of demons,
lots of devils that
have already caused
me to want to succeed.
I was blessed with
some some intellect
that some intellectual curiosity
as well that just drove me.
I had a lot of my
early influences
came from the Jesuits.
I was Jesuit trained
in both the high school
level and the College.
And I always knew that I wanted
it to be something special.
I don't mean that
self-servingly,
but I didn't want to succeed
and be well thought of.
And I give a lot of the early,
early credit to the Jesuits.
NARRATOR: In 2011,
Intermedia Partners
sold possession of Thomas Nelson
to Rupert Murdoch, most famous
for his ownership of Fox News.
Murdoch is also a Knight
of the Pontifical Order
of Saint Gregory, knighted
by the pope for his service
to Rome.
Through Thomas Nelson,
Murdoch's company
now publishes the
new King James Bible.
And through Zondervan, he
publishes the NIV Bible
as well.
Interestingly, Mr. Murdoch
also owns HarperCollins that
publishes the Satanic Bible
for the Church of Satan.
But are these things just
strange coincidences,
or could there be
other powers at work?
We considered this interview
with the late Malachi Martin,
a former Jesuit priest, and
author of a best selling book
on the history of
the Jesuit order.
In this interview,
Martin reveals
what are said to be the
dark powers at work in Rome.
-"Father uh, I've got an
article here, entitled,
Two Eminent Churchmen Agree
uh-- that there actually is--
this is a shocker
to a lot of people.
Uh, there is-- There are
Satanic practices going on
at the Vatican--
could that be true?"
-"Yes.
Now when we say in the Vatican,
it's at a certain level,
and um there's no doubt about
it, that there have been
and still are practices
that are uh formally
uh venerating Lucifer,
the prince of this world."
NARRATOR: In the
scripture the destruction
of spiritual Babylon
is clearly foretold.
We read that, "Babylon
the Great is fallen,
is fallen, and has become
the habitation of devils,
and the hold of
every foul spirit,
and a cage of every
unclean and hateful bird.
And I heard another
voice from heaven saying,
'Come out of her my people
that ye be not partakers of her
sins, and that ye receive not of
her plagues.' For her sins have
reached on to
heaven, and God hath
remembered her inequities."
In the Gospel of Matthew,
Jesus told the parable
of a man who sowed
good seed in his field.
But while men
slept, an enemy came
and sowed tares among the wheat.
The tare is said to be a type
of weed, known as the darnel.
The darnel is sometimes
called false wheat,
because as it grows it
appears almost exactly
like the real wheat
surrounding it.
But as it nears the harvest,
the wheat terms golden brown
but the darnel turns black, and
its seeds are full of poison.
Jesus said, "He that soweth the
good seed is the son of man;
the field is the world.
The good seed are the
children of the kingdom.
But the tares are the
children of the wicked one.
The enemy that sowed
them is the devil."
With these things in mind, we
ask the question, when it comes
to the history of the Church and
the Bible, who are the tares,
and who are the wheat?
And for which of them,
has been preserved
the true and faithful
record of the word of God?