Mars (1968) - full transcript
In the movie it is told (on the basis of scientific these 1960th years) about physical conditions on the planet Mars, a possibility of life and hypothetical forms of vegetation on her, about "canals" and "seas" of the red planet. The director has tried to recreate environment of one of the most mysterious planet of solar system.
Mars
Written and directed by P. Klushantsev
Everything has begun that fabulous night
in 1877, almost a century ago. Italian
astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli came
to his observatory. It was a very silent night.
Schiaparelli led his telescope to Mars. Even
in such good weather conditions the vision
is not clear. But then he saw the straight
lines on the surface of the planet. He
couldn?t believe his eyes. ?It?s not an illusion,
I must draw it down!? Schiaparelli called
those lines the channels. A conventional
name, because they were of many km in width.
Later he wrote about these channels:
?Their strange look and geometrical
correctness led many people to the thought
that they were built by some creatures
living on this planet. I can?t neglect this theory
because it has nothing impossible in itself.?
Schiaparelli had on his mind the opinion
of the American astronomer Percival Lowell.
Lowell had built a special observatory
to study Mars. He created a theory
of Martian civilization. This theory caused
a lot of arguments and worldwide attention.
But there were no proofs.
In 50 years science and technic developed.
The automatic prospectors flew to the planets
of our galaxy. ?Mars-1? was the first one.
The space era has begun. Still, Mars
is a mysterious planet. The main question is
if there is life on Mars. The famous Russian
scientist G. Tikhov, the founder of astrobotany,
has studied this question for many years.
Today many scientists write about the possibility
of life on Mars. But we must know
the physical conditions of the planet. So a great
work of gathering facts is necessary. A lot
of new sensational theories appear and become
the basis for serious scientific works. Then
the theories collapse, and the new ones
appear on their ruins.
But we are still far from the truth. Is Mars
a dead planet or a flourishing one?
Are the satellites of Mars artificial or not?
Mars became the main topic
in the arguments between optimists
and pessimists. The optimists are more
active ? they talk about mind on Mars.
What if there are Martians? Are they cruel,
as H. Welles thought, or kind and beautiful,
as in ?Aelita? by A. Tolstoy? It is very
interesting. The world is preparing
for the assault of Mars. Soon we will know
everything, but the truth can be staggering.
We must sort out all the materials that we
already have. So we shouldn?t waste our time.
What are the physical conditions on Mars?
We like warmth. Is there warmth on Mars?
It is far from the Sun; maybe it is unbearably
cold there. Here in Crimea observatory we?ve
measured the temperature on the surface of Mars.
V. Moroz, Ph. D, guided this work. Now we
know the temperature conditions on Mars
quite well. We can be carried there in our
imagination. It is warm on Martian equator
at noon, and it becomes cold in the evening.
And at night the strongest frost appears.
In the morning the temperature raises quickly.
The climate is harder then we have
in mountains. But in comparison
with the Moon Mars is a resort.
We, people of Earth, breathe. We need air.
Is there air on Mars? Yes, there is. Without the layer
of air Mars would look this way, as the Moon.
There is atmosphere, but what kind of it?
We use spectroscopy to find out.
The sunrays have complex nature.
The atmosphere detains some part
of the rays. The black lines appear in specter.
With the help of this analysis we found out
that the air on Mars contains a lot of CO2,
a bit of H2O, and the rest is either N2
(as on Earth), or Ar. So far no oxygen
has been found. V. Moroz thinks that
the density of atmosphere on Mars
is around 1/100 of atmosphere on Earth.
The American spaceship confirmed this theory.
It defined the density of atmosphere
on Mars by fading of radio signals.
Here on Earth the atmosphere is 100 times
rarified on the height of 30 km. Only
balloons and special planes can fly here.
They could fly also on Mars but near
the surface. But the ?Mariner? data can be
inaccurate. It could check the density
on the level of mountains, and near
the surface it could be higher. But we?d still
need the space suit.
We, people of Earth, drink. Is there water
on Mars? Now we are in the observatory
in Pulkovo. N. Kozyrev, Ph.D., leads
the observation. The dark masses on the surface
of Mars were initially mistreated as the water
resources. They were called seas. But water
would shine under the sun, and the seas are matt,
the whole planet is dry land. Still there is moisture.
We can observe morning fog and small clouds.
The main water resources on Mars are contained
in polar caps. It probably is a layer of hoarfrost.
How much water is there on Mars?
Let?s collect it and spill all over the planet.
The whole layer would be only a few mm deep.
The same operation on Earth would cause
a water layer 3 km deep. Mars is drier than Earth,
and far damper than the Moon. So what result
do we have? Mars has almost no water,
bits of atmosphere, probably without oxygen,
a bit of warmth. The conditions on Mars
are very hard. Is life there possible?
What does biology say? What does our
experience say? The life on Earth is impossible
without water. It is in all our organisms.
It contains nourishing elements. That?s why
life must have appeared in ocean.
And only then it came on land. It led
to certain problems, first of all, to the lack
of moisture. But life showed a great ability
of adaptation. Plants in desert learned to pull
water from the deep, to use morning dew,
to create water reserves inside themselves.
In general, plants do not need a lot of moisture.
A sunflower drinks a lot in summer.
But for the building of its tissue it spends
only a glass of water. Two more liters it needs
to saturate with juices. It also spends 55%
of moisture on evaporation, to avoid overheating.
There can be no such need on Mars. And such plant
would be satisfied with a spoon of water per day.
Let?s come back to the desert. Plants collect
moisture inside themselves. Animals get
moisture by eating these plants. The bigger
animals get moisture by eating the smaller ones.
But what if there was no water at all?
The kangaroo rat can leave weeks without water.
It eats dry grains and produces water
with the help of special ferments, which split
molecules of carbohydrates. A lack of moisture
for plants and animals is an overcoming problem.
The other one ? cold ? is more serious.
The liquid protoplasm of living organisms
is against hard frosts of Arctic. And again
we can find examples of adaptation.
Lobelia, which grows in mountains, takes
the form of a sphere at night. There is positive
temperature inside. In the middle latitude,
some plants sleep the whole winter.
But the process of conifer?s photosynthesis
continues the whole year. Water in its cells
stays in liquid form, because of special ferments
that stop freezing. Many animals fall
in anabiosis in winter. Larvae of a corn
butterfly hide in corn stalks. They freeze
and the water in their tissues turns into ice.
In lab they can be frozen up to the temperature
of liquid Helium: -269 C.
They rock like stones.
But being warmed, they come back to life.
Warm-blood is a most effective way
of fighting cold. Such animals are heated
from inside. They create in themselves
an environment needed for a normal
functioning of their organisms. It is very cold,
but penguins are in a good mood. They walk
and sit out their nestlings. They are sure,
that there is no such cozy place in the world.
The adaptation of life is incredible.
The geysers have the temperature
of around 90 C, but water-plants are alive.
Their cells contain special protein,
that doesn?t coagulate in such conditions.
The seabed. Constant darkness, only bits
of oxygen. And still there is life. There is
no oxygen on the bottom of the Black Sea.
The water is full of hydrogen sulfide.
But if you take a sample of this water
you will find there some organisms, bacteria.
The microorganisms that can live without
oxygen are found even in oil taken
from the bowels of the earth. Different bacteria
can be found in the radioactive water
of the nuclear reactor, in sulfuric acid,
in the dust in stratosphere. The spores
of bacteria don?t die even in space,
under pressure of radiation.
Many scientists study the adaptability
of living organisms. In the Leningrad Institute
of Cytology, in the Laboratory of space biology
professor Lozina-Lozinsky tries to answer
a question if there is scope for life, and if yes,
is Mars included in it?
The Earth gives us many examples of hard
conditions. This device is called Photostat.
Ernest Zaar is one of its founders. Now another
group of earthmen goes to Mars: larvae
of a corn butterfly, worms unseen by unaided eye
and the smallest infusorian. Here they are
alive and active. We spill the water
with infusorian on the sand. Than we put
the subject of our experiment into the Photostat.
We asked to put there a glass of clear water
to show how quickly water evaporates in vacuum.
This water will disappear during the day.
Now air is being pumped out the camera,
and the nitrogen is being pumped in.
The pressure of atmosphere is as on Mars.
The automatic program of day and night
changing is switched on.
The experiment has begun.
It is hard for our animals.
They suffer from the lack of oxygen.
But atmosphere in this chamber is being
renewed every minute. Maybe this fact
will help them to gather appropriate amount
of oxygen. But still moisture evaporates very
quickly. There is such low pressure inside
the chamber that even cold water boils.
This way would our blood boil if we appeared
on Mars without the space suit. The special lamps
fill the chamber up with ultraviolet. The atmosphere
of Mars can?t delay this part of radiation.
The program says that it is night. The electric sun
sets. The radiation stopped. But the frost began
to intensify. How do our animals feel?
Maybe they are already dead? But then our hope
to find on Mars some creatures that look like us
will also die.
The experiment lasted a couple of days.
The 10th morning came. The sun rose
on our artificial Mars and it begun
to thaw out.
And we are running, hurrying,
hastening. Forgetting that at the same time
scientists solve such a grandiose problems.
Are we, the earthmen, alone? Or are we a part
of a Sun family, settled in different planets?
The larvae are dead. Vacuum killed them.
And what about nematodes? They are alive.
But they spent 10 days in anabiosis.
However, sleep is not death. The sand contained
water, and infusorian fell asleep only at night.
They led an active life, even propagated.
So our experiment succeeded, there are
such protozoa that can live on real Mars.
They would sleep in difficult periods of time,
and lead a normal life in favorable periods.
Life could have appeared on Mars billions
of years ago, and now there could be developed
forms of live.
However, the life on Mars is possible,
and if so maybe it can be discovered. But how?
What can we see on Mars through millions of km?
Here on Earth in such conditions the Crimea
would be an almost invisible dot. And it?s 300 km
in size. Still ac. Barabashov looks in the telescope.
Why? Isn?t this technic old?fashioned now,
when we send satellites in space to make photos
from close distance? These photos of Mars
made by ?Mariner-4?. Great photos, we can see
Martian mountains for the first time. Every photo
captured the area close in width to the Crimea.
This area looked like a dot in telescope,
but now we can see a lot of details.
But it is still not enough for the search of live.
The smallest object like this crater is a couple
of km in size. Look at the photos of Earth made
from satellite. That?s Italy. The white spots are clouds.
The Caspian Sea.
The Sinai Peninsula.
The Nile.
The Baltic Sea.
The Finnish Bay.
The Black Sea and the Crimea. Good photos,
but Martians wouldn?t find any life on Earth
with their help. Even such big cities like Leningrad
cannot be seen on them. So it?s pointless
to search life on Mars with ?Mariner?s? photos.
And how to search? How to distinguish organic
from inorganic? Now we see that telescope isn?t
old-fashioned. It helps to observe Mars for months,
and what is invisible in static becomes visible
in dynamic. Mars moves on orbit, the sun lights up
its pole, and this hemisphere has spring. Inorganic
is indifferent to it, but what about organic?
We have the melting of snow, the water warms up,
the ground comes to light, the first brooks purl and
interflow in rapid streams. The nature wakes up,
the great symphony of life begins. The colorless
vegetation darkens, becomes green.
Would Mars react on the appearance of warmth?
Look at the borders of the snow cover. See,
the seas near it darken and change their color.
The snow cover steps back to the pole. Imagine
how something alive reaches for the sun,
something familiar and clear.
Isn?t it beautiful?
But it?s only a dream. Let?s answer this question
in cold blood. The bright spots are dry and lifeless
deserts. The sands stretch for hundred and thousands
kilometers. But what can be the dark spots but
vegetation? What if it is some kind of a cloud?
No, the seas on Mars are too stable to be clouds.
Probably they are peculiarities of a relief.
As on the Moon, these seas can be plains of dark
stoned lava. Or they are the dark rocks in
the middle of deserts, or maybe none of it
because these areas have similar relief.
But they should differ from each other.
We managed to measure the temperature of seas
and deserts separately. The seas are warmer.
You think that this is the warmth of life but it isn?t.
Remember that leaves are colder than stones.
Plants spend part of warmth on evaporation
of water and on chemical processes, and the dark
stones are warmer than the light, just because
everything dark gets warmer.
So the easiest way to explain these seas is
to say that they are the dark rocks. But the rocks
are stable and the delineation of these seas change
with time. Here is the example. There were stains
here but now they are gone. The delineation
of the Sun Lake differs very much. Here the new
dark area appeared. Stones are incapable of this.
However the American scientist McLaughlin
thought that the inorganic could change due
to wind and dilapidation. Let?s concede, he said,
that Martian volcanoes produce a great amount
of dark dust. The wind moves these clouds,
and ash falls down creating the dark areas.
The sand covers this ash. After the new eruption
the wind can blow in other direction, so
the delineation of ashes varies. It would be
a good hypothesis if ash could flourish in spring.
In the Kharkov observatory ac. Barabashov
explores how Martian seas and deserts reflect
the light. The desert reflects light as plane
and smooth surface. The seas disperse light
that means that their surface is uneven.
Uneven and changing its colour surface has
the massif of plants. There is one more
argument pro plants. There are sandstorms
on Mars. It is scary in such time. The sand ocean
is awake; the vortex of stone dust gets wild,
the sand clouds hide the sun. Tornados mix
the desert with the sky. Millions of tones
of sand begin to whirl. And then it all falls
somewhere in hundreds of kilometers,
hides the dark stones and ashes, makes the planet
look like desert. But the dark spots on Mars
remain. Only life can resist the sandstorms.
Only organic can germinate through the sand.
So the dark spots on Mars can be explained
by vegetable life. Ac. Barabashow thinks
the same: ?There are enough evidences
to answer positively on a question about life
on Mars.? Martian seas are probably zones
of life. But what kind of life? Martian plants
should have a lot of peculiarities. How can we
find out anything? We know that there is
a special course of spring. Here on Earth plants
blossom out at first in South, in Crimea.
And then this process starts in North ?
in Kiev, then Moscow, Leningrad. The warmth
goes from equator to pole. And vise versa on Mars
- from pole to equator. This seems ridiculous.
Earth plants have routs in moist ground,
so they use local water. They need only warmth
to wake them up. Martian plants do not react
on warmth, because they are submerged
into dry ground. Water comes from pole,
from melting snow. This is imported water.
But how does water reach them? There is
not enough water on Mars to create a stream.
And probably moisture created by melting
evaporates avoiding liquid phase. This steam
can be transported by wind and at night it will
become hoarfrost. But winds cannot explain
the whole system of water supply on Mars.
Lowell thought that the mystery of hydrologic
cycle on Mars was connected with its strange
channels.
What are the Martian channels? These dark
lines are remarkable. They do not break
in the middle. It seems that they connect
some important centers. Mars is covered
with mountains and the channels use
the shortest ways ignoring all obstacles.
Here and there channels are seen against
the background of seas. Some channels
double themselves in a specific season.
In winter these mysterious lines cannot be
seen. In spring the surface of Mars darkens
beginning with seas and channels. They must
have similar nature. Being zoomed in, the channels
disintegrate into separate spots.
On these photos the channels
cannot be seen. That?s why skeptics doubt
that they exist at all. That?s not true.
Take a random newspaper photo and zoom it.
The image disappears, and only dots are left.
But you can?t claim that there is no photo.
It exists but the image can be read only
from distance. After the analysis of the photos
some spots and unevenness were discovered.
That can be lefts of plants that create an image
of lines from distance. So the channels are not
an illusion. But what will our satellites find
on their place? The file of craters with
green plants inside, or maybe the mountains
gathering moisture from air, or dunes covering
something alive from hurricanes, or ravines
where moisture comes out from depth?
Whatever it is, it?s still unclear why do these
details of relief create such a strange net.
Relief of a planet corresponds with fracture
in the rock strata. But on Earth relief doesn?t
create such net as on Mars. American scientist
Alan Webb mathematically analyzed the net
of Martian channels. He compared it to
the scratches on the dry ground, to the cracks
on a china vase, to a spider?s web, and
to the net of roads in Ohio, USA. The analysis
led to an interesting result. Martian channels
are close to an artificial net of roads. Webb
thought that these channels are traces of plants
along some service lines.
We want to remind you of the words
of ac. Kuprevich: ?The origin of such formation
cannot be explained by natural causes.
This is a creation of mind and will?.
Well said, but let?s be careful. We finish
the study of channels with the following quotation:
?We can find all the truth only there, on-site?.
Now we?re able analyze on-site only on the Moon.
But soon the similar machines will land
on Mars too. And we will wait for the first reports.
At first the robots will look for bacteria.
The device will suck the dust from Martian
ground. Then the special process will show
if there are any bacteria. If yes, they will propagate.
The radio will inform that there is life on Mars.
This device will also look for bacteria.
If will fire a shot with a scotch tape and
?lick off? the dust. These robots will be very
complicated, but we will never be able to trust
them fully. Imagine this robot?s work on Mars:
it will land, turn an antenna, find Earth and say:
?Landed successfully?. Meanwhile, the robot
will start his analysis. It will examine the area
and show us the desert, the dead planet.
But the robot won?t examine the place
of its own landing.
We will be sad. Maybe there are at least
bacteria? The robot will act following
the program, but it can?t foresee everything.
The tape will gather some dust, and the capstan
will pull it into. The insect will get to the chamber
where analysis takes place. And then another
mistake will take place. The breeding ground
appears to be very tasty. We will wait but we
won?t be able to see that the light goes through
the empty glass. The robot will report that no
bacteria were found. So there is no life on Mars?
Complete silence. Strange world, dead world.
Despite all the progress in robot technics only
human can solve the mysteries of Mars.
It will take time to make it possible.
We will fly around and look closely. It?s scary.
There were examples that people sent animals
ahead. The first earthman on Mars will
probably be quadruped. What will it see?
We can try to imagine Martian plants,
departing from our plants living in hard
conditions.
Protect our plants from winds,
frost, and drought ? like many scientists did
thinking up Martian flora. The fundamental
works in this field belong to soviet scientist
G. Tikhov. He though that Martian plants look
similar to ours from tundra, mountains and
the Arctic. He said that these plants must be
undersized, grass and bushes at first. They can be
of blue or purple colour due to hard conditions.
Not everyone agrees with Tikhov. Soviet
astronomer Lubarsky claims the opposite:
?There should be red or brown colours, but not blue
as Tikhov claims.? But the words of American
astronomer Sallsbery sound also verisimilar:
?Temperature drop should?ve caused
the development of pigmentation which makes
the plants look black. Martian plants should
expose wide plane surface to the sun. Turning into
a tube at night would reduce the loss of warmth?.
On the other hand, ac. Fesenkov said that there
couldn?t be any higher plants on Mars at all.
But the existence of lichen, algae, and bacteria
cannot be neglected. Ac. Fesenkov describes
cheerless Mars. We prefer another, optimistic
theory of ac. Kuprevitch. According to him,
the relief that we believe to be covered with lichen
is covered indeed with higher plants.
We?d like to believe our quadruped astronaut'll see
such Mars, blooming, full of sounds and colors.
Sallsbery made an interesting claim. There are
indeed some forms of flora on Mars. It leaves
a step, but a huge step to higher forms of life.
We must be prepared for everything, to stand
the encounter with Martian inhabitants.
Everything is possible. And until the man lands
on Mars its mysteries will torment us.
The main question is who is there. The theory
of Martians wasn?t neither confirmed
nor disproved. What if Lowell was right?
What if we will see structures of a unique
civilization? What if the channels are a huge
irrigation system? With the help of these strange
hydro-technical devices Martians collect
the moisture from poles, and direct it to
the equatorial districts of the planet. It is easier
to live there. The tubes stretch for a thousand km.
The plantations are situated along them.
And the crossings of the channels are
the centers of Martian civilization, the cities.
But what if it is all opposite? We will see
the traces of a long-dead civilization:
the ruins sleeping for thousands of years,
the buildings, which were full of life many
years ago, the evidences of existence of
a mysterious nation that didn?t wait for us.
And only the orbital city, created by genious
engineers, continues to fly around the planet.
It flies in the dark abyss ? slowly, with its
lights off, a silent monument of the great mind.
It is Phoebus, the satellite of Mars, which will
never stop.
But probably everything will be much simpler.
And we will say about the channels:
?We should have guessed!? Let?s speculate.
The channels look like a system of
communication. But even animals sometimes
create structures that look artificial.
Bee honeycombs for instance, or beaver weirs.
What are the schemes of bird migration
or the tracks of eel that crossed Atlantic Ocean,
if not a system of communication? So
the channels can be routes of some living
creatures? migration. Guided by an instinct,
they bring moisture from poles to equatorial
lands. There are a lot of them. They move in
a shortest way, using the cracks of surface.
The plants grow along these tracks. They use
water and give these animals shadow
and food instead.
Sure, it is merely a fantasy. We can create
a lot of such theories. It is not bad, because
we cannot cognize the world without fantasy,
without this great quality of human soul.
Don?t be afraid to dream, go and make your
landing on Mars. Today! Now.
The first man on Mars. The sun will rise
in an hour and light this unique world up.
In an hour we will unravel all the mysteries
that bothered us for ages. But it?s so hard
to wait this hour. The sky lightens. These white
smokes must be geysers or evaporation of hoarfrost.
And what if they woke up? The lights flashed out
in mountains. That can be either the sun lights
or the lights in the castle of Aelita.
People of Earth! Stand up, and be ready.
It?s a great moment ? we discover a new planet.
The discovery of Mars.
The end.
Written and directed by P. Klushantsev
Everything has begun that fabulous night
in 1877, almost a century ago. Italian
astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli came
to his observatory. It was a very silent night.
Schiaparelli led his telescope to Mars. Even
in such good weather conditions the vision
is not clear. But then he saw the straight
lines on the surface of the planet. He
couldn?t believe his eyes. ?It?s not an illusion,
I must draw it down!? Schiaparelli called
those lines the channels. A conventional
name, because they were of many km in width.
Later he wrote about these channels:
?Their strange look and geometrical
correctness led many people to the thought
that they were built by some creatures
living on this planet. I can?t neglect this theory
because it has nothing impossible in itself.?
Schiaparelli had on his mind the opinion
of the American astronomer Percival Lowell.
Lowell had built a special observatory
to study Mars. He created a theory
of Martian civilization. This theory caused
a lot of arguments and worldwide attention.
But there were no proofs.
In 50 years science and technic developed.
The automatic prospectors flew to the planets
of our galaxy. ?Mars-1? was the first one.
The space era has begun. Still, Mars
is a mysterious planet. The main question is
if there is life on Mars. The famous Russian
scientist G. Tikhov, the founder of astrobotany,
has studied this question for many years.
Today many scientists write about the possibility
of life on Mars. But we must know
the physical conditions of the planet. So a great
work of gathering facts is necessary. A lot
of new sensational theories appear and become
the basis for serious scientific works. Then
the theories collapse, and the new ones
appear on their ruins.
But we are still far from the truth. Is Mars
a dead planet or a flourishing one?
Are the satellites of Mars artificial or not?
Mars became the main topic
in the arguments between optimists
and pessimists. The optimists are more
active ? they talk about mind on Mars.
What if there are Martians? Are they cruel,
as H. Welles thought, or kind and beautiful,
as in ?Aelita? by A. Tolstoy? It is very
interesting. The world is preparing
for the assault of Mars. Soon we will know
everything, but the truth can be staggering.
We must sort out all the materials that we
already have. So we shouldn?t waste our time.
What are the physical conditions on Mars?
We like warmth. Is there warmth on Mars?
It is far from the Sun; maybe it is unbearably
cold there. Here in Crimea observatory we?ve
measured the temperature on the surface of Mars.
V. Moroz, Ph. D, guided this work. Now we
know the temperature conditions on Mars
quite well. We can be carried there in our
imagination. It is warm on Martian equator
at noon, and it becomes cold in the evening.
And at night the strongest frost appears.
In the morning the temperature raises quickly.
The climate is harder then we have
in mountains. But in comparison
with the Moon Mars is a resort.
We, people of Earth, breathe. We need air.
Is there air on Mars? Yes, there is. Without the layer
of air Mars would look this way, as the Moon.
There is atmosphere, but what kind of it?
We use spectroscopy to find out.
The sunrays have complex nature.
The atmosphere detains some part
of the rays. The black lines appear in specter.
With the help of this analysis we found out
that the air on Mars contains a lot of CO2,
a bit of H2O, and the rest is either N2
(as on Earth), or Ar. So far no oxygen
has been found. V. Moroz thinks that
the density of atmosphere on Mars
is around 1/100 of atmosphere on Earth.
The American spaceship confirmed this theory.
It defined the density of atmosphere
on Mars by fading of radio signals.
Here on Earth the atmosphere is 100 times
rarified on the height of 30 km. Only
balloons and special planes can fly here.
They could fly also on Mars but near
the surface. But the ?Mariner? data can be
inaccurate. It could check the density
on the level of mountains, and near
the surface it could be higher. But we?d still
need the space suit.
We, people of Earth, drink. Is there water
on Mars? Now we are in the observatory
in Pulkovo. N. Kozyrev, Ph.D., leads
the observation. The dark masses on the surface
of Mars were initially mistreated as the water
resources. They were called seas. But water
would shine under the sun, and the seas are matt,
the whole planet is dry land. Still there is moisture.
We can observe morning fog and small clouds.
The main water resources on Mars are contained
in polar caps. It probably is a layer of hoarfrost.
How much water is there on Mars?
Let?s collect it and spill all over the planet.
The whole layer would be only a few mm deep.
The same operation on Earth would cause
a water layer 3 km deep. Mars is drier than Earth,
and far damper than the Moon. So what result
do we have? Mars has almost no water,
bits of atmosphere, probably without oxygen,
a bit of warmth. The conditions on Mars
are very hard. Is life there possible?
What does biology say? What does our
experience say? The life on Earth is impossible
without water. It is in all our organisms.
It contains nourishing elements. That?s why
life must have appeared in ocean.
And only then it came on land. It led
to certain problems, first of all, to the lack
of moisture. But life showed a great ability
of adaptation. Plants in desert learned to pull
water from the deep, to use morning dew,
to create water reserves inside themselves.
In general, plants do not need a lot of moisture.
A sunflower drinks a lot in summer.
But for the building of its tissue it spends
only a glass of water. Two more liters it needs
to saturate with juices. It also spends 55%
of moisture on evaporation, to avoid overheating.
There can be no such need on Mars. And such plant
would be satisfied with a spoon of water per day.
Let?s come back to the desert. Plants collect
moisture inside themselves. Animals get
moisture by eating these plants. The bigger
animals get moisture by eating the smaller ones.
But what if there was no water at all?
The kangaroo rat can leave weeks without water.
It eats dry grains and produces water
with the help of special ferments, which split
molecules of carbohydrates. A lack of moisture
for plants and animals is an overcoming problem.
The other one ? cold ? is more serious.
The liquid protoplasm of living organisms
is against hard frosts of Arctic. And again
we can find examples of adaptation.
Lobelia, which grows in mountains, takes
the form of a sphere at night. There is positive
temperature inside. In the middle latitude,
some plants sleep the whole winter.
But the process of conifer?s photosynthesis
continues the whole year. Water in its cells
stays in liquid form, because of special ferments
that stop freezing. Many animals fall
in anabiosis in winter. Larvae of a corn
butterfly hide in corn stalks. They freeze
and the water in their tissues turns into ice.
In lab they can be frozen up to the temperature
of liquid Helium: -269 C.
They rock like stones.
But being warmed, they come back to life.
Warm-blood is a most effective way
of fighting cold. Such animals are heated
from inside. They create in themselves
an environment needed for a normal
functioning of their organisms. It is very cold,
but penguins are in a good mood. They walk
and sit out their nestlings. They are sure,
that there is no such cozy place in the world.
The adaptation of life is incredible.
The geysers have the temperature
of around 90 C, but water-plants are alive.
Their cells contain special protein,
that doesn?t coagulate in such conditions.
The seabed. Constant darkness, only bits
of oxygen. And still there is life. There is
no oxygen on the bottom of the Black Sea.
The water is full of hydrogen sulfide.
But if you take a sample of this water
you will find there some organisms, bacteria.
The microorganisms that can live without
oxygen are found even in oil taken
from the bowels of the earth. Different bacteria
can be found in the radioactive water
of the nuclear reactor, in sulfuric acid,
in the dust in stratosphere. The spores
of bacteria don?t die even in space,
under pressure of radiation.
Many scientists study the adaptability
of living organisms. In the Leningrad Institute
of Cytology, in the Laboratory of space biology
professor Lozina-Lozinsky tries to answer
a question if there is scope for life, and if yes,
is Mars included in it?
The Earth gives us many examples of hard
conditions. This device is called Photostat.
Ernest Zaar is one of its founders. Now another
group of earthmen goes to Mars: larvae
of a corn butterfly, worms unseen by unaided eye
and the smallest infusorian. Here they are
alive and active. We spill the water
with infusorian on the sand. Than we put
the subject of our experiment into the Photostat.
We asked to put there a glass of clear water
to show how quickly water evaporates in vacuum.
This water will disappear during the day.
Now air is being pumped out the camera,
and the nitrogen is being pumped in.
The pressure of atmosphere is as on Mars.
The automatic program of day and night
changing is switched on.
The experiment has begun.
It is hard for our animals.
They suffer from the lack of oxygen.
But atmosphere in this chamber is being
renewed every minute. Maybe this fact
will help them to gather appropriate amount
of oxygen. But still moisture evaporates very
quickly. There is such low pressure inside
the chamber that even cold water boils.
This way would our blood boil if we appeared
on Mars without the space suit. The special lamps
fill the chamber up with ultraviolet. The atmosphere
of Mars can?t delay this part of radiation.
The program says that it is night. The electric sun
sets. The radiation stopped. But the frost began
to intensify. How do our animals feel?
Maybe they are already dead? But then our hope
to find on Mars some creatures that look like us
will also die.
The experiment lasted a couple of days.
The 10th morning came. The sun rose
on our artificial Mars and it begun
to thaw out.
And we are running, hurrying,
hastening. Forgetting that at the same time
scientists solve such a grandiose problems.
Are we, the earthmen, alone? Or are we a part
of a Sun family, settled in different planets?
The larvae are dead. Vacuum killed them.
And what about nematodes? They are alive.
But they spent 10 days in anabiosis.
However, sleep is not death. The sand contained
water, and infusorian fell asleep only at night.
They led an active life, even propagated.
So our experiment succeeded, there are
such protozoa that can live on real Mars.
They would sleep in difficult periods of time,
and lead a normal life in favorable periods.
Life could have appeared on Mars billions
of years ago, and now there could be developed
forms of live.
However, the life on Mars is possible,
and if so maybe it can be discovered. But how?
What can we see on Mars through millions of km?
Here on Earth in such conditions the Crimea
would be an almost invisible dot. And it?s 300 km
in size. Still ac. Barabashov looks in the telescope.
Why? Isn?t this technic old?fashioned now,
when we send satellites in space to make photos
from close distance? These photos of Mars
made by ?Mariner-4?. Great photos, we can see
Martian mountains for the first time. Every photo
captured the area close in width to the Crimea.
This area looked like a dot in telescope,
but now we can see a lot of details.
But it is still not enough for the search of live.
The smallest object like this crater is a couple
of km in size. Look at the photos of Earth made
from satellite. That?s Italy. The white spots are clouds.
The Caspian Sea.
The Sinai Peninsula.
The Nile.
The Baltic Sea.
The Finnish Bay.
The Black Sea and the Crimea. Good photos,
but Martians wouldn?t find any life on Earth
with their help. Even such big cities like Leningrad
cannot be seen on them. So it?s pointless
to search life on Mars with ?Mariner?s? photos.
And how to search? How to distinguish organic
from inorganic? Now we see that telescope isn?t
old-fashioned. It helps to observe Mars for months,
and what is invisible in static becomes visible
in dynamic. Mars moves on orbit, the sun lights up
its pole, and this hemisphere has spring. Inorganic
is indifferent to it, but what about organic?
We have the melting of snow, the water warms up,
the ground comes to light, the first brooks purl and
interflow in rapid streams. The nature wakes up,
the great symphony of life begins. The colorless
vegetation darkens, becomes green.
Would Mars react on the appearance of warmth?
Look at the borders of the snow cover. See,
the seas near it darken and change their color.
The snow cover steps back to the pole. Imagine
how something alive reaches for the sun,
something familiar and clear.
Isn?t it beautiful?
But it?s only a dream. Let?s answer this question
in cold blood. The bright spots are dry and lifeless
deserts. The sands stretch for hundred and thousands
kilometers. But what can be the dark spots but
vegetation? What if it is some kind of a cloud?
No, the seas on Mars are too stable to be clouds.
Probably they are peculiarities of a relief.
As on the Moon, these seas can be plains of dark
stoned lava. Or they are the dark rocks in
the middle of deserts, or maybe none of it
because these areas have similar relief.
But they should differ from each other.
We managed to measure the temperature of seas
and deserts separately. The seas are warmer.
You think that this is the warmth of life but it isn?t.
Remember that leaves are colder than stones.
Plants spend part of warmth on evaporation
of water and on chemical processes, and the dark
stones are warmer than the light, just because
everything dark gets warmer.
So the easiest way to explain these seas is
to say that they are the dark rocks. But the rocks
are stable and the delineation of these seas change
with time. Here is the example. There were stains
here but now they are gone. The delineation
of the Sun Lake differs very much. Here the new
dark area appeared. Stones are incapable of this.
However the American scientist McLaughlin
thought that the inorganic could change due
to wind and dilapidation. Let?s concede, he said,
that Martian volcanoes produce a great amount
of dark dust. The wind moves these clouds,
and ash falls down creating the dark areas.
The sand covers this ash. After the new eruption
the wind can blow in other direction, so
the delineation of ashes varies. It would be
a good hypothesis if ash could flourish in spring.
In the Kharkov observatory ac. Barabashov
explores how Martian seas and deserts reflect
the light. The desert reflects light as plane
and smooth surface. The seas disperse light
that means that their surface is uneven.
Uneven and changing its colour surface has
the massif of plants. There is one more
argument pro plants. There are sandstorms
on Mars. It is scary in such time. The sand ocean
is awake; the vortex of stone dust gets wild,
the sand clouds hide the sun. Tornados mix
the desert with the sky. Millions of tones
of sand begin to whirl. And then it all falls
somewhere in hundreds of kilometers,
hides the dark stones and ashes, makes the planet
look like desert. But the dark spots on Mars
remain. Only life can resist the sandstorms.
Only organic can germinate through the sand.
So the dark spots on Mars can be explained
by vegetable life. Ac. Barabashow thinks
the same: ?There are enough evidences
to answer positively on a question about life
on Mars.? Martian seas are probably zones
of life. But what kind of life? Martian plants
should have a lot of peculiarities. How can we
find out anything? We know that there is
a special course of spring. Here on Earth plants
blossom out at first in South, in Crimea.
And then this process starts in North ?
in Kiev, then Moscow, Leningrad. The warmth
goes from equator to pole. And vise versa on Mars
- from pole to equator. This seems ridiculous.
Earth plants have routs in moist ground,
so they use local water. They need only warmth
to wake them up. Martian plants do not react
on warmth, because they are submerged
into dry ground. Water comes from pole,
from melting snow. This is imported water.
But how does water reach them? There is
not enough water on Mars to create a stream.
And probably moisture created by melting
evaporates avoiding liquid phase. This steam
can be transported by wind and at night it will
become hoarfrost. But winds cannot explain
the whole system of water supply on Mars.
Lowell thought that the mystery of hydrologic
cycle on Mars was connected with its strange
channels.
What are the Martian channels? These dark
lines are remarkable. They do not break
in the middle. It seems that they connect
some important centers. Mars is covered
with mountains and the channels use
the shortest ways ignoring all obstacles.
Here and there channels are seen against
the background of seas. Some channels
double themselves in a specific season.
In winter these mysterious lines cannot be
seen. In spring the surface of Mars darkens
beginning with seas and channels. They must
have similar nature. Being zoomed in, the channels
disintegrate into separate spots.
On these photos the channels
cannot be seen. That?s why skeptics doubt
that they exist at all. That?s not true.
Take a random newspaper photo and zoom it.
The image disappears, and only dots are left.
But you can?t claim that there is no photo.
It exists but the image can be read only
from distance. After the analysis of the photos
some spots and unevenness were discovered.
That can be lefts of plants that create an image
of lines from distance. So the channels are not
an illusion. But what will our satellites find
on their place? The file of craters with
green plants inside, or maybe the mountains
gathering moisture from air, or dunes covering
something alive from hurricanes, or ravines
where moisture comes out from depth?
Whatever it is, it?s still unclear why do these
details of relief create such a strange net.
Relief of a planet corresponds with fracture
in the rock strata. But on Earth relief doesn?t
create such net as on Mars. American scientist
Alan Webb mathematically analyzed the net
of Martian channels. He compared it to
the scratches on the dry ground, to the cracks
on a china vase, to a spider?s web, and
to the net of roads in Ohio, USA. The analysis
led to an interesting result. Martian channels
are close to an artificial net of roads. Webb
thought that these channels are traces of plants
along some service lines.
We want to remind you of the words
of ac. Kuprevich: ?The origin of such formation
cannot be explained by natural causes.
This is a creation of mind and will?.
Well said, but let?s be careful. We finish
the study of channels with the following quotation:
?We can find all the truth only there, on-site?.
Now we?re able analyze on-site only on the Moon.
But soon the similar machines will land
on Mars too. And we will wait for the first reports.
At first the robots will look for bacteria.
The device will suck the dust from Martian
ground. Then the special process will show
if there are any bacteria. If yes, they will propagate.
The radio will inform that there is life on Mars.
This device will also look for bacteria.
If will fire a shot with a scotch tape and
?lick off? the dust. These robots will be very
complicated, but we will never be able to trust
them fully. Imagine this robot?s work on Mars:
it will land, turn an antenna, find Earth and say:
?Landed successfully?. Meanwhile, the robot
will start his analysis. It will examine the area
and show us the desert, the dead planet.
But the robot won?t examine the place
of its own landing.
We will be sad. Maybe there are at least
bacteria? The robot will act following
the program, but it can?t foresee everything.
The tape will gather some dust, and the capstan
will pull it into. The insect will get to the chamber
where analysis takes place. And then another
mistake will take place. The breeding ground
appears to be very tasty. We will wait but we
won?t be able to see that the light goes through
the empty glass. The robot will report that no
bacteria were found. So there is no life on Mars?
Complete silence. Strange world, dead world.
Despite all the progress in robot technics only
human can solve the mysteries of Mars.
It will take time to make it possible.
We will fly around and look closely. It?s scary.
There were examples that people sent animals
ahead. The first earthman on Mars will
probably be quadruped. What will it see?
We can try to imagine Martian plants,
departing from our plants living in hard
conditions.
Protect our plants from winds,
frost, and drought ? like many scientists did
thinking up Martian flora. The fundamental
works in this field belong to soviet scientist
G. Tikhov. He though that Martian plants look
similar to ours from tundra, mountains and
the Arctic. He said that these plants must be
undersized, grass and bushes at first. They can be
of blue or purple colour due to hard conditions.
Not everyone agrees with Tikhov. Soviet
astronomer Lubarsky claims the opposite:
?There should be red or brown colours, but not blue
as Tikhov claims.? But the words of American
astronomer Sallsbery sound also verisimilar:
?Temperature drop should?ve caused
the development of pigmentation which makes
the plants look black. Martian plants should
expose wide plane surface to the sun. Turning into
a tube at night would reduce the loss of warmth?.
On the other hand, ac. Fesenkov said that there
couldn?t be any higher plants on Mars at all.
But the existence of lichen, algae, and bacteria
cannot be neglected. Ac. Fesenkov describes
cheerless Mars. We prefer another, optimistic
theory of ac. Kuprevitch. According to him,
the relief that we believe to be covered with lichen
is covered indeed with higher plants.
We?d like to believe our quadruped astronaut'll see
such Mars, blooming, full of sounds and colors.
Sallsbery made an interesting claim. There are
indeed some forms of flora on Mars. It leaves
a step, but a huge step to higher forms of life.
We must be prepared for everything, to stand
the encounter with Martian inhabitants.
Everything is possible. And until the man lands
on Mars its mysteries will torment us.
The main question is who is there. The theory
of Martians wasn?t neither confirmed
nor disproved. What if Lowell was right?
What if we will see structures of a unique
civilization? What if the channels are a huge
irrigation system? With the help of these strange
hydro-technical devices Martians collect
the moisture from poles, and direct it to
the equatorial districts of the planet. It is easier
to live there. The tubes stretch for a thousand km.
The plantations are situated along them.
And the crossings of the channels are
the centers of Martian civilization, the cities.
But what if it is all opposite? We will see
the traces of a long-dead civilization:
the ruins sleeping for thousands of years,
the buildings, which were full of life many
years ago, the evidences of existence of
a mysterious nation that didn?t wait for us.
And only the orbital city, created by genious
engineers, continues to fly around the planet.
It flies in the dark abyss ? slowly, with its
lights off, a silent monument of the great mind.
It is Phoebus, the satellite of Mars, which will
never stop.
But probably everything will be much simpler.
And we will say about the channels:
?We should have guessed!? Let?s speculate.
The channels look like a system of
communication. But even animals sometimes
create structures that look artificial.
Bee honeycombs for instance, or beaver weirs.
What are the schemes of bird migration
or the tracks of eel that crossed Atlantic Ocean,
if not a system of communication? So
the channels can be routes of some living
creatures? migration. Guided by an instinct,
they bring moisture from poles to equatorial
lands. There are a lot of them. They move in
a shortest way, using the cracks of surface.
The plants grow along these tracks. They use
water and give these animals shadow
and food instead.
Sure, it is merely a fantasy. We can create
a lot of such theories. It is not bad, because
we cannot cognize the world without fantasy,
without this great quality of human soul.
Don?t be afraid to dream, go and make your
landing on Mars. Today! Now.
The first man on Mars. The sun will rise
in an hour and light this unique world up.
In an hour we will unravel all the mysteries
that bothered us for ages. But it?s so hard
to wait this hour. The sky lightens. These white
smokes must be geysers or evaporation of hoarfrost.
And what if they woke up? The lights flashed out
in mountains. That can be either the sun lights
or the lights in the castle of Aelita.
People of Earth! Stand up, and be ready.
It?s a great moment ? we discover a new planet.
The discovery of Mars.
The end.