Creativity in Education: Exploring the Imbalance (2013) - full transcript
The United States is a leading nation when it comes to innovation. It is a country that took man to the moon, and a nation that values our greatest asset, Human Creativity. Inspired by the Newsweek article 'The Creativity Crisis', educator Matthew Worwood uses his documentary project to explore how changes to education policy have reduced opportunities to nurture and cultivate creative thinking skills in the classroom. Using interviews with educators, academics and creativity scholars, 'Creativity and Education: Exploring the Imbalance' examines the challenges that educators now face when it comes to cultivating creativity in school while teaching the content that is measured on the test.
- [JFK] We choose to go
to the moon in this decade
and do the other things,
not because they are easy,
but because they are hard.
Because that goal...
- [Man] Three, two, one, zero,
all engines running, lift off!
We have a lift off, 32
minutes past the hour,
lift off on Apollo 11.
- [Neil Armstrong] Okay, I'm
going to step off the LM now.
That's one small step for man,
one giant leap for mankind.
(soft piano music)
- [John] The United
States is a leading nation
when it comes to innovation.
It is a country that took man to the moon,
and a nation that values
our greatest asset:
human creativity.
NASA and the space program
stand as an example
to America's ability to think creatively,
in order to solve problems
and achieve the impossible.
(soft piano music)
Human creativity has transformed man
from the primitive
species that we once were,
into the global phenomenon
that we see today.
As educators and parents,
we must take an interest in
what makes people creative,
and if it is something
that can be successfully
developed in school.
For nations that know how to cultivate
our most prized asset,
are more likely to thrive
in a future economy
built on ideas, and measured on a nations
ability to be inventive.
(soft piano music)
(bright piano music)
- [Susan] If we talk about
the people on the street
and what they believe about creativity,
you'll find that they
don't have to think about
what creativity is.
Or they believe that it is
in the realm of the arts,
or that creativity is something
that belongs to others
and they never really thought
about it for themselves.
- [Juliet] Every teacher
that I've ever spoken to
has a different definition of creativity,
that's one of the
interesting things about it,
it's not easy to define,
everyone has a take
it's so multi-faceted.
(bright piano music)
- [Cynthia] I work in a
creative studies department,
but when I tell people I teach creativity,
people automatically go to the arts.
I usually tell people I
teach creative thinking,
and people say, "Hm, tell me about that."
And then I tell them about
creative thinking skills,
and when I talk about
curiosity and openness,
and tolerance for ambiguity,
and solving problems,
then they start to understand
what I mean by creativity.
- [John] Creativity is not an
outcome limited to the arts,
but includes a way of
thinking that solves problems,
generates new knowledge,
and spearheads innovation.
In recent years, it has produced
a revolution in technology
where companies like Apple
and Google are quite literally
changing how we live,
learn, work, and play.
(bright piano music)
The conversation about creativity
expands beyond the outcome of a product.
In 1961, a creativity
scholar named Mel Rhodes
clarified the topic around four items
that included not only
products, but also the person,
the process, and environment, or press.
This was known as the Four
P's Model of Creativity.
- [Susan] We can talk about how creativity
has to do with personality,
and what kind of
characteristics are creative,
we can talk about
processes that people use
that lead to creative outcomes.
We can talk about environments,
particularly in education,
we talk about, and in the business world,
we talk about the conditions
that will allow for creativity.
(bright piano music)
- [John] The general
definition for creativity
is something new and useful.
While the word new can be
quickly defined as original,
the word useful requires
some more thought.
For exactly who must
find it useful in order
for it to be creative, is open for debate.
- [Susan] So if we say,
what is creativity?
Well, is it a product?
And if it is, how do
you define that product?
Is it new?
Well, if it's just new,
what if it's useless?
What if it's just nonsensical?
It doesn't mean anything to anyone.
Then we push back and say
well, that's not creative.
It has to have some value, it
has to have some usefulness.
- [John] As parents and teachers,
we often refer to the most
simple act as creative.
But how do we separate something
like a childhood painting,
produced in an elementary classroom,
to one by a professional
artist that's auctioned
for millions of dollars?
- [Sally] Creativity
consists of what I could call
personal creativity.
Some people would call this small C,
in the sense that all people
can live a more creative life.
They can take safe risks, they
can get out of their routine,
they can attempt to be more
creative in their work,
in their life, in their child raising,
in the things that they like to do.
And then, of course, there's
the other kind of creativity
which has been characterized
as big C creativity,
that makes a difference in your community,
your state, your region,
the country, the world.
(dramatic music)
- [John] While not every
person will have the talent
to paint like Picasso, or
play the piano like Mozart,
we all have the ability to be creative,
for we are born with
certain characteristics
that help us think creatively.
As children, we're naturally curious,
open minded, imaginative, and innocent
to the defined workings of the real world.
We can tolerate ambiguity, use fantasy,
visualize things from
different perspectives,
and quickly produce and
consider many ideas.
These characteristics have been identified
as a creativity skill
set, that can dwindle
unless consciously nurtured when young.
- [Juliet] It's definitely
part of the human condition,
I do believe that we are all
born as creative individuals,
but I do think that you
can unlearn creativity
as much as you can learn
to be more creative.
And I think that's something
that happens much more
in schools and institutions,
and with young people today,
probably more than learning to be creative
is that young people can
unlearn to be creative.
(soft piano music)
- [Joseph] I don't think
that the education system
does very well at teaching creativity.
About 99% of going to school
is finding the right answer.
I think that if you want to teach children
how to be creative,
you've got to give them
problems and opportunities
for which there is no single,
pre-determined correct answer.
- [John] Unfortunately, in our
current methods of schooling,
many of the problems and
activities that students encounter
are clearly defined with
right and wrong ways
to achieve a pre-determined outcome.
These circumstances do
not require students
to think creatively.
Instead, they condition them to behave
like a computer program,
designed to execute
a specific set of instructions,
in order to achieve the one
right answer on an exam.
- [Susan] Yeah, when you look at how well
the education system promotes creativity,
they probably get a D
(laughs)
at this point.
And it's starting to even decline more.
- [Cynthia] You know, what
our school system is missing
right now is this notion of teaching kids
how to think on their own,
to come up with their own
ideas, to ask questions,
and to ultimately become
life long learners.
- If I have pre-determined
what I want the outcome
to be, then the
opportunities for creativity
are not present.
- [John] If the students
ability to think creatively
is not adequately nurtured when young,
then the chances of them
growing into a person
who produces something new
and useful in a given field
is significantly reduced.
- [Juliet] If you go and
look at young children,
nursery aged children working,
you will see creativity really happening.
They're there collecting
the things they need,
moving from one place to another,
they may even be talking
it through for themselves.
"If I do this, then will this happen?
"What would happen if I did this?
"I know, I will go put this on that,
"and that will make something else."
And as children get older,
they start getting pushed into,
there's a right answer,
there's not a right answer,
there's only one answer,
you have to do it this way,
and so they can unlearn being creative
as much as they can learn it.
(children talking)
- [John] As children
progress through the grades,
the expectations of the
classroom change radically.
Children are no longer
given the same opportunities
to nurture the characteristics
we associate with creativity,
and as a person, they
become less creative.
Evidence shows that since the 1990s,
some of the most important
characteristics needed
for creativity have started to decline
as students progress through
the education system.
Dr. Kyung Hee Kim at the
college of William and Mary,
analyzed the results of
300,000 students and adults
who participated in a
series of creativity tests.
Her study showed that fluency,
the ability to produce
and consider many alternatives,
improves in young children
up until grade three,
where it then begins a journey of decline.
- [Joseph] So much of school
does follow a formula,
there's a right way to
solve a math problem
or come up with the right
answer in a history course
or a science course, and
so if we want them to think
divergently, looking in many,
many different directions
rather than convergently,
focusing on finding
a single pre-determined correct answer,
then we've gotta give them
experiences that not just
allow that, they value that,
because that's where
creativity comes from.
- [John] Another characteristic to suffer
as children progress through the grades,
is their ability to be original.
Similar to fluency, this
skill improves through
elementary school, but around fifth grade
it falls drastically, and
only begins to recover
after students leave high school.
- [Susan] What we do in
the education system,
is counter to promotion of creativity.
And I hear this from
teachers all the time,
if I have to spend my time,
and assessments are important,
and standards are good,
and being accountable is very important,
but what we say those things are,
are pretty much messed up at this point,
particularly accountability.
- [John] A federal system of rigid testing
and high stakes
accountability now dominate
the education system,
and threaten our nations
most prized asset, the
ability to think creatively.
What appears to be a
decline in creativity,
has been referred to
as a creativity crisis.
In order to better
understand this problem,
we must examine the federal governments
mission in education, and
better understand how certain
event have shaped education policy,
and what we've come to most
value in our nations classroom.
(dramatic music)
- [Announcer] Today a
new moon is in the sky,
a 23 inch metal sphere placed in orbit
by a Russian rocket...
- [John] When the Soviet Union launched
the first satellite into orbit,
it was perceived as a
threat to national security,
and more importantly, economic supremacy.
How was it that the world
super power had fallen
so far behind in the space race?
In its aftermath, the United
States quickly attributed
this failure to education and
a lack of creative thinking
on the part of engineers and scientists.
- [Joseph] I think a real turning point,
as far as our concern
for developing high level
talent in this country,
occurred at the time Sputnik,
all of the sudden we realized
that we were not the leading
nation in the world when it
came to the exploration of space
and all the technology
that goes with that.
And so the federal government immediately
jumped into the act,
and they passed a bill,
and the name of the bill
was very interesting,
because they called it
The National Defense
Education Act, NDEA.
- [John] Under the leadership
of President Eisenhower,
the National Defense
Education Act allocated
one billion dollars for education
over a period of four years.
Designed to spearhead
innovation by promoting
science, engineering, and mathematics,
this act would demonstrate success
for the federal government in education,
and spark the kind of
creativity that would eventually
put man on the moon.
- Half a century ago,
when the Soviets beat us
into space with the launch of
a satellite called Sputnik.
We had no idea how we would
beat them to the moon.
The science wasn't even
there yet, NASA didn't exist.
But after investing in better
research and education,
we didn't just surpass the Soviets,
we unleashed a wave of
innovation that created
new industries and millions of new jobs.
- [John] Though short
lived, the National Defense
Education Act became the first
intervention to establish
a justified mission for the
federal government in education,
to defend the economy
and provide a work force
that could compete against
foreign competition.
Almost a decade later,
the federal government
would begin its second
mission under the leadership
of President Lyndon Johnson,
and establish legislation
that would be forever
used to shape the system
of schooling in this country.
- [Daniel] President
Johnson decided he was gonna
make one serious stab
at combating poverty,
it was known as the War on Poverty,
and he believed that if
you could inject a large,
sums of federal monies
directly into school districts,
that you may have a chance of dealing
with the problem of poverty.
- [John] Johnson's war on
poverty led to one of the largest
education bills of all time.
Signed into law outside
a Texas high school,
the 1965 Elementary and
Secondary Education Act
has been re-authorized
under nearly every president
since its inception.
On each occasion, it has
been revised to reflect
the educational policies
of each administration,
and used to implement
the federal governments
mission in education, which in
1983, would shift drastically
under the leadership of President Reagan,
where the needs of the
economy would once again
be placed at the forefront
of education policy.
- [Daniel] Since the
publication in 1983 of a very
powerful report known as A Nation At Risk,
that the federal government
has begun to clarify its role
as one of supporting schools,
essentially as agents
of economic growth and development.
- [John] A Nation at
Risk expressed concern
that the US was losing
its competitive edge
in terms of business and industry.
"Our once challenged
preeminence in commerce,
"industry, science, and
technological innovation
"is being overtaken by
competitors throughout the world."
The report complained that
the gains made after Sputnik
had been squandered because
of a watered down curriculum,
that was described as, "A
cafeteria style curriculum,
"which the appetizers
and desserts can easily
"be mistaken for the main courses."
After A Nation At Risk, the
federal government increased
its funding and influence over schooling,
in an effort to better prepare students
to compete in the global economy.
This effort has slowly re-shaped the goal
of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act,
which is now focused as much
toward combating poverty
as it is toward promoting
economic development.
- [Daniel] Many of the
efforts that have been made
since 1983 and during the
presidency of recent presidents,
is to somehow shape schooling,
in a way that it develops curricula,
forms of assessment, forms
of teacher appraisal,
which feed into their
goal of seeing schools
as an arm of economic
growth and development.
- [John] But efforts to improve schooling
have failed to close the achievement gap,
and student test scores
in the United States
continue to decline when
compared to other nations
around the world.
In response to the perceived failure,
the federal government enacted
a back to the basics movement,
centered on a rigid
system of accountability
that has now become the backbone
of our education system.
- First principle is accountability.
Every school has a job to
do, and that's to teach
the basics, and teach them well.
- [John] In 2002, President
George W. Bush passed into law
his administrations
re-authorization of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act,
which received a new name,
and a significant makeover.
- It was right after 9/11,
and Congress wanted something
positive to happen, and my
sense is that they crafted it
without reading it.
They knew the title, No Child Left Behind,
and who could be opposed to that title?
But it had almost nothing
to do with the real mission
that was in the original Elementary
and Secondary Education
Act, which was for equality
of opportunity for all.
- [John] The No Child Left
Behind law placed greater
emphasis on annual tests.
Schools that made adequate
yearly progress would receive
an increase in funding,
but those that failed
would be punished, and this
was particularly challenging
when the benchmarks that it set
were considered unattainable.
- [Karen] In order to greet
adequately yearly process
they want every student in
the school to be achieving,
regardless of what sort
of special education needs
that the children have,
or what sort of backgrounds they have
Students for example, who speak English
as a second language.
They would be expected to
achieve at exactly the same level
as a student who'd been in
the school system for seven,
eight, nine years.
- [John] While assessment
is an important part
of our education system,
when too much emphasis
is placed on the outcome of a test,
the impact to the
curriculum can be severe.
As teachers begin to
devote much of their time
to teaching only the content
that will be measured on the test.
- [Elizabeth] When
teachers teach to the test,
what that means is that the
only thing teachers teach
is what they figure is probably
going to be on the test,
and they look at old tests,
and they see what it is,
and they teach the kinds of questions,
they teach the range of questions,
and they have the children
practice filling in forms,
and that's all the children are doing,
is getting ready for the test.
- [John] Like many of its predecessors,
the No Child Left Behind
law has done very little
to promote the natural characteristics
that make us creative.
Opportunities to nurture
curiosity, imagination,
and originality, have been
removed from many classrooms,
in order to prepare students
for high stakes examinations.
- I think the pendulum shifted
terribly in the opposite
direction during the Bush era,
with No Child Left Behind.
No Child Left Behind probably
was the biggest death knell
to creativity of anything that I've seen
in the 40 odd years that
I've been in education.
- [John] As students become
accustomed to being told
what they must do in order
to succeed on a test,
they become less likely
to think outside the box,
or produce work that
is considered original.
Instead, the develop comfort
in pre-determined outcomes,
that are clearly defined,
with specific information
that tells them exactly what they must do
and how they must do it.
- Watering it down to
things that are very basic,
we're not doing our job to
provide citizens that can think,
and provide a work force
with diverse skills
and the ability to tolerate
ambiguity, complexity,
think for themselves, and be original,
and produce in different ways.
- [John] While the importance
of learning content
is undisputed, the rigid
system used to evaluate
its progress has created
an unequal balance,
between nurturing creativity,
and teaching content
that can easily be measured on a test.
- There's this unequal balance,
when you think about content
versus creativity.
And for very simple reasons,
content knowledge is very
easy to measure.
Does it matter that we measure it?
Maybe, maybe not.
Creativity is much harder to measure.
- [John] As educators attempt
to satisfy government policy,
instructional practices have
moved away from activities
that challenge students
to think creatively,
and toward drill and
kill culture that focuses
almost entirely on memorizing the content
that will most likely appear on the test.
- So post Sputnik in
the United States, 1957,
post that period our
government started to value
scientific inquiry,
discovery, space travel,
it valued more challenging
content for students.
Now I think academically talented students
are being routinely held back
by test preparation policies
and I think there's very
little attention placed
on the highest level of talent, A,
or B, opportunities for high levels
of creativity in children.
- [John] The test prep
policies, which have emerged
in an era of accountability
and assessment,
fail to develop the
creative skills required
for our economy, and this is in conflict
with the governments main
mission in education.
(soft piano music)
- [Obama] None of us can
predict with certainty
what the next big industry will be,
or where the new jobs will come from.
30 years ago, we couldn't
know that something called
the internet would lead
to an economic revolution.
What we can do, what America
does better than anyone else,
is spark the creativity and
imagination of our people.
- [John] As our economy
becomes one centered
on information and technology,
the ability to think
creatively has become an
essential ingredient for success.
In an extensive IBM poll,
creativity was listed
as the most important
leadership skill by 1500 CEO's
from around the world.
Creativity is no longer a transient fad,
but something considered essential
to a nations economic growth.
- Creativity is so important in education.
Creativity is the
foundation for innovation,
and when you think about our society,
whether it be our national society,
or our global society, new
ideas are what are critical
to the success and growth
of the nation and the world.
- One single idea can
start an entire industry,
and we look at people like
Bill Gates and Steve Jobs,
for example, and think of the
millions of people employed
just because they came up
with certain kinds of ideas.
- You can name any career
field, and say why creativity's
important, but the problem
is, it's not being taught,
so people are going out
into the work force,
and I see this happen all
the time with our undergrads,
they go out into the work
force, and they don't know
how to be creative in their environment.
They don't know where to start,
they don't know how to
think for themselves,
and that's where the problem is.
- [John] Unfortunately, the
ambiguity that surrounds
creativity often leaves
most people to question
if it's something that
can be taught in school.
- [Cynthia] I have been
teaching creativity
for the last 12 years,
and I can absolutely,
100% tell you that
creativity can be taught,
and I've watched it with
people who have said,
"I'm not creative, I can't be creative",
to, "I really feel like
I'm a creative person
"and here's why: I'm a
better problem solver,
"I'm more curious, I'm more open minded,
"I can tolerate ambiguity."
- [John] Since the 1950s, a
tremendous amount of knowledge
has been generated about how
we can teach and cultivate
the characteristics we
associate with creativity.
A creativity scholar
named E. Paul Torrance,
is not only credited with identifying
many of our creative
characteristics, but also
instructional approaches
that have been used
to successfully teach creativity.
His most famous, the
Torrance Incubation Model of
Teaching and Learning,
is designed to teach
creativity while teaching the content.
- [Susan] One of the
breakthroughs in the field
of creativity, if you look at
the fact that you can teach
for creativity, while you
teach another content,
that took it to a different level...
What's unique about the
Torrance Incubation Model,
is the fact that teachers
are always saying,
"I don't have time" and they don't.
So how is it that we
could integrate creativity
into our daily practice and education,
to teach our content and
teach for creativity.
- [John] Called TIM for short,
this instructional approach
not only identifies
a content goal for a lesson,
but also a creativity goal
from the skill set than
Torrance identified.
This creativity goal is
then integrated into three
distinct components, that are
used to structure the lesson
and deliver its content.
- [Susan] It's one of the
few models that allows for
the integration of creativity
into whatever you're teaching,
so that you teach what you teach well,
and you teach it better because
you are teaching creativity.
- [John] While a variety
of instructional methods
designed to teach creativity
have been proven successful,
the most appealing in
recent years has been
within the movement toward
teaching 21st century skills,
which manifest as part of a project-based
learning environment.
- [Joseph] You can't
teach 21st century skills
out of a book, you've
gotta get kids involved
in a self-selected project
that they can become
motivated and enthusiastic about.
You've gotta give them the
kinds of tools that make them
investigative thinkers,
rather than just simply
accumulating and storing
knowledge so they can
spit it back on the test.
- [John] In a survey of film students
who participated in a
project-based learning environment,
to produce content for
a student film festival
in the state of Connecticut,
68% listed creativity or problem solving
as the number one skill developed
as part of this process.
While project-based learning
has many different variations,
which include problem based learning,
design based learning,
and more recently,
challenge based learning,
they all share the goal
of challenging students
to explore a real world problem,
as part of a student centered environment
that remains absent of any
pre-determined outcome.
- So generally, they
are real world problems,
you want to try to find
something that has applicability
in the world so it has
relevance to the student.
- [Student] Red, yellow, I mean, the white
is for explorer questions, the light blue
is for constellation questions.
- [John] One appeal to
project-based learning
is the need for students to problem solve
and think independently
in order to generate
their own ideas as part
of a meaningful process
of creative problem finding.
- [Frank] I'm often
baffled when I hear about
teachers that send their
students home at night and say,
"come up with five ideas
for your project tomorrow."
And what a disservice
we're doing to students
by not letting them
experience problem finding,
looking at resources, evaluating options,
thinking about the choices
that will make them successful.
- [John] When implemented correctly,
not only do students have
an opportunity to generate
and explore new ideas, but
during the implementation
process, they also can
self-select the areas that most
appeal to their own creative
skills and interests,
and this has a long lasting
impact on a students
creative path in life.
- [Sally] The longitudinal
studies that we've done
of kids over decades have shown,
when children get involved
in highly creative,
productive project-based learning work,
they're more likely to seek
out that work in the future,
they're more likely to
do projects at home,
to seek work that is more creative.
- [Girl] See how they have like,
pumpkins in the pumpkin,
you could do that,
what are you gonna do for the thing?
- [John] Another appeal
to project-based learning
is the existence of a
student centered environment,
where the teacher merely
acts as the facilitator
of the learning process,
a role very different
from the teacher centered
approach that has manifested
in a world of accountability
and assessment.
- You can't do good
project-based learning,
in a step by step method.
These are ill defined
problems, problems that,
hopefully the teacher has no
idea what the solution is,
and the direction that
the students take the work
is critical to that process.
So if you don't know the
recipe to solving a problem,
that's a great thing.
- [John] As educators and
parents, we must begin
to use our own creativity,
to identify opportunities
for students to generate
original ideas that have value
beyond the classroom,
and while achieving this
in an era of accountability and assessment
can be difficult, it is possible.
- I think it's a little bit of a cop out,
to say that because we live
in an age of accountability
that we can't teach creativity,
because they absolutely can work together.
- Senate Committee on
Health, Education, Labor,
and Pensions will please come to order.
I'd like to thank all of
you for being here today
as we continue to discuss reauthorization
of the Elementary and
Secondary Education Act.
- [John] In 2009, President Obama released
his administrations education
blueprint for reform,
a proposal for the latest
reauthorization of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act.
While acknowledging some
of the perceived failures
of No Child Left Behind, the focus remains
toward economic development.
- Maintaining our leadership
in research and technology
is crucial to America's success.
But if we want to win the future,
if we want innovation to
produce jobs in America,
and not overseas, then we
also have to win the race
to educate our kids.
- [John] In exchange for federal funds,
some level of accountability
and assessment
must be expected, but
the federal government
must recognize that the greater emphasis
on examinations has not
improved test scores,
or closed the achievement gap.
What's required is an equal emphasis
in the development and
cultivation of the skills
associated with creativity,
so that a greater number
of students can join
what Richard Florida from the
Martin Prosperity Institute
has referred to as an
emerging creative class,
that is set to dominate
the future job market.
- Well I'll tell you an interesting story.
About six years ago, I
was teaching a course
here at Buffalo State,
and it was all freshman.
And I went in to teach an introduction
to creative studies course.
And when I was teaching this course,
they kept raising their
hand, and they kept saying,
"Okay, well what do we need to know,
"what do we need to know,
"what do we need to know?"
And I said, "What do you mean,
what do you need to know?"
"Well what's going to be on the test?"
What's going to be on the test?
There aren't any tests
in creative studies.
(soft piano music)
- [John] With the introduction
of the Common Core
standards in 2012, and
current advances in digital
technology, we now have a
real opportunity to explore
this content through original works of art
that can stimulate creative growth,
and engage a greater number of students
in our most important acronym,
but we must begin to equip
educators with the skills
required to cultivate creativity,
as they explore this content, otherwise
this opportunity will be lost.
- I think there will
always be some individuals
that are extremely creative,
that will buck the trend,
that will go against the grain.
They're not always easy
people to get on with,
they're not always
people that schools like,
they're not always people that get on well
with other people, because actually,
they're individualists, they
think their own thoughts,
they do their own things.
I think those people will always exist.
But, I think the huge majority of people
will not fulfill their own potential,
if they are pushed into
thinking only in a certain
way to pass a certain
test, if they're channeled
down routes that say
there's this right answer,
and that right answer,
and this wrong answer.
Then, we have got a problem.
- [John] While we may continue to progress
for some time on the backs
of a few individuals,
our eventual needs for
the many will become
too great, the cure for cancer,
the answer to our warming climate,
the solution to our growing population,
and the many wonders yet to
be discovered could be lost,
if the individuals with
the right combination
of knowledge and talent are
never given an opportunity
to fulfill their creative potential.
- [Joseph] We really need
to make sure that we provide
opportunities for creative
thinking on the parts
of larger numbers of kids,
we always revert to the same
two or three examples.
Imagine if we were able to talk
about a hundred Steve Jobs,
and a hundred Bill Gates, and
a hundred Steven Spielbergs,
and all of a sudden we realize
that there's so much more
that can be developed and
can be created and produced
by our society, by our culture.
- I think there's a
lot of dangerous things
happening in education, I
think that's a strong word
but I believe that
we're really undermining
our creative potential,
and it's critical as we look
at a more uncertain future,
that we are prepared for that.
I think more now than in any other decade,
if we are not willing to bring forward
the creative potential of our students,
knowledge alone is not
going to get us very far.
- [Obama] President
Eisenhower signed legislation
to create NASA and invest in
science and math education,
from grade school to graduate school.
- [Man] Space shuttle
now on internal power.
- [Obama] In the years that have followed,
the space race inspired a generation
of scientists and innovators.
- [Man] Liquid oxygen and liquid nitrogen
fill and drain valves are closed.
- [Obama] For me, the space
program has always captured
an essential part of what
it means to be an American.
Reaching for new heights,
stretching beyond
what previously did not seem possible.
- [John] We are all born
with natural characteristics
that make us creative.
Combined with individual
talent and motivation,
our creative potential
is part of a freedom
we hold so dear.
Many scientists and
scholars lost their lives
to bring forth new perspectives
and new knowledge for our world.
- [Man] And the hand-off
to Atlantis' onboard...
- [John] The period of
enlightenment that began
in Western Europe brought
forth a new nation,
built on ideas and innovation.
We have come too far to turn back now.
President Obama stated,
"This is our generations
Sputnik moment."
so let's do what we do
best and get creative.
With just a few small
steps, we can once again
cultivate creativity in our schools,
and bring about the next
giant leap for mankind.
(upbeat music)
(guitar music)
♫ Drove through a storm
♫ Of yellow butterflies
♫ Splattered on the windshield
♫ As we sped out of town
♫ Strange things happen in the desert
♫ Optical illusions
float by like tumbleweed
♫ Time bends around itself here
♫ I drifted off to sleep
♫ You're in my dreams