Rule 34 (2022) - full transcript

100 TOKENS = TAKE OFF CLOTHES

400 TOKENS = MASTURBATION

600 TOKENS = SURPRISE!

KINKYANGEL HAS ENTERED

Hi Kinky Angel.

How's it going?

SCHLONG32 HAS ENTERED

Schlong, it's been a while...

SCHLONG32: WHAT'S THE SHOW TODAY?

FUTURELESBIAN HAS ENTERED

Hi Lesbian, how are you?



KINKYANGEL: COME TO ME MY DEVIL

Hi little Angel,

I'll be your devil today.

I'll make you fall from heaven.

KINKYANGEL: YEAH! MAKE ME FALL

FAPHARRYPOTTER HAS ENTERED

JOYSTICK: I WANT TO KNOW
ABOUT THE SURPRISE

Wait, you disappeared...

JOYSTICK TIPPED 5 TOKENS

SCHLONG TIPPED 15 TOKENS

KIDNERD: SUCH GREAT TOKENS

Thank you, Joystick.

Thank you, Schlong.

So nice.



JACKBEAN TIPPED 5 TOKENS

JACKBEAN TIPPED 10 TOKENS

GOAL REACHED: TAKE OFF CLOTHES!

BULLCUCK: SUCH A NICE ASS

PERVERT_CARIOCA: LET ME SEE
YOU SQUEEZE THOSE TITS

DELUDED55: LOOKING FOR A SUB
WHO LIKES IT ROUGH

BULLCUCK TIPPED 10 TOKENS

CAIOPUBES TIPPED 5 TOKENS

PERVERT_CARIOCA: FUCKING NICE PUSSY!
PERVERT_CARIOCA: I'M IN LOVE.

FUTURELESBIAN: WANNA SEE YOU LICK ME
PERVERT_CARIOCA: NICE PUSSY!!!

BULLCUCK TIPPED 10 TOKENS

CAIOPUBES TIPPED 5 TOKENS

CAIOPUBES TIPPED 5 TOKENS

- PERVERT_CARIOCA: TIPPED 5 TOKENS.
- Thank you!

PERVERT_CARIOCA TIPPED 5 TOKENS
CAIOPUBES TIPPED 5 TOKENS

CAIOPUBES TIPPED 5 TOKENS

JACKBEAN TIPPED 20 TOKENS
SCHLONG32 TIPPED 5 TOKENS

JACKBEAN TIPPED 20 TOKENS
KINKYMINEIRO TIPPED 5 TOKENS

SCHLONG32: WANT TO SEE YOU CUM

KINKYMINEIRO TIPPED 5 TOKENS

YOU CURRENTLY HAVE 400 TOKENS
GOAL REACHED: MASTURBATION!

You guys are cheating.

CAIOPUBES TIPPED 5 TOKENS

JOYSTICK: WANT TO SEE YOU
COVERED IN CUM

BULLCUCK: ARE YOU ALWAYS
SO WELL BEHAVED?

CAIOPUBES TIPPED 5 TOKENS

WANKERRJ: COME FOR ME

SCHLONG32 TIPPED 5 TOKENS

Oh, hey there...

It's not an outfit, guys.

I got accepted.

Thank you all for getting me
where I am today, yeah?

Bye-bye!

I would like to start
by emphasizing something

I think is pretty obvious,
but important:

In law, we are not interested
in what really happened.

What we're really after
is a fair solution.

Nothing can fool you more than

that false, stupid translation
from Latin,

"sentencing is a sentiment".

God forbid being judged
by someone's sentiments.

If you want to convict someone,
you have to be sure.

And I don't mean
beyond a reasonable doubt.

No! I mean dead sure.

You have to be sure
it was Colonel Mustard

with the candlestick in the library.

If you can't show
the three cards that prove:

1- means, 2-materiality,
and 3-causality assessment,

it's not worth anything.

What I'm trying to say
is that criminal justice

revolves around controlling
the means.

No matter the end.

Put yourself in the place of a Judge:

You're judging a case, right?

A serious crime, for example,
the rape of a 12-year-old girl.

A terrible crime, unimaginable.

You're investigating the accused, OK?

Then, during the hearing,
you listen to a recorded phone call

in which the guy
confesses to a friend,

over the phone,

that he raped this 12-year-old girl.

You listen to the tape.

But this phone call had been recorded

on the 16th day after
the phone had been tapped.

What says the law?

That wiretapped conversations are
only valid for up to 15 days.

So, what do you do
with this evidence?

You leak it to the press!

No, precisely, you do not leak
the illegal conversation to the press,

you dismiss the case!

You say: listen,
the rules have been broken,

because criminal process is
about controlling the means,

not about reaching an end.

This is the reason why
that due process was created.

And us, public defenders

are also defenders of the fulfillment
of the due process of law.

It is up to us,
most of all, to resist

the eradication of the promises made
by the democratic Rule of Law.

Good luck.

Get your hips in line.

Put your legs back.

That's it.

Change sides.

You two, move a bit to the side.

Where you know him from?

- He is Caio's friends.
- Stop it.

Joaquim is friends with that guy?

I was in love with him
and you call him "that guy"?

- Here you go, girls.
- Thanks, Leandro.

Lúcia,

"let me keep it in
just a little more?"

"I'll control myself, come on"

- "I'll put a condom on later."
- "You're the only one..."

Fucking jerk!

The worst part is when
they say they won't put it in,

and then it kind of slips.

"I'm sorry, I didn't mean to,

it won't happen again, babe".

"Bad deeds are always rewarded."
Frida Kahlo.

- What?
- Frida didn't say that!

It must be from some
shitty quotes website, like:

"Dreams are whispers from your soul."

You think?

Hold on.

Quotes that were never said
by their supposed authors.

"Bad deeds are always rewarded."
Frida Kahlo.

No way!

Just for the record:
new photos on my blog.

Hey there.

So...

did you like it?

There's only one thing I didn't like.

That you're not in the pictures?

That you're going to become famous
and forget about me.

Correction: I'm going to be famous,

be involved in thousands of scandals

and then call you
to get me out of them.

Public defenders aren't lawyers,
OK girl?

Really?

But they can model?

You know it's not my thing, Nat.

Honey, BDSM doesn't mean
just dressing up...

- There are...
- Fifty Shades of Grey!

I was going to say there are thousands
of different flavors...

I have an idea.

You can shoot me chained and tied up.

Such an original image of a black woman
no historic references whatsoever.

What do you think?

And what will be the name of the
exhibit? Com'on, five seconds.

5, 4, 3, 2, 1

You must try to understand.
It's about your desire.

I'm not talking about that, Nat.

I'm talking about...

I'm talking about decolonization.
Building new images.

I'm talking about things
you don't understand.

Hi, tell me if this girl is reiterating
any historical references.

What are you doing?
You're so evil!

What have I just
demonstrated to you all?

Over the last 30 years

many theories have been created

seeking to decrease
the violence of the State,

to contain its excessive power.

Which of these theories
were really assimilated

by the courts
to reduce criminalization?

Think about it.

Why continue to create new theories

if they do not guarantee
anybody's freedom?

This is why I say

that criminal law's potential
for resistance is exhausted.

Excuse me.

It's very interesting.

We're all here sitting comfortably.

Under air conditioning,
big windows, great light.

Everyone is nicely dressed.

It's cool, right?

The calmness.

The possibility of discussing
the good of humanity

without anyone ever worrying
about having to lie down on the floor

in order to not be killed.

Very comfortable.

What's the point?
That this is a privileged discussion?

- Yes.
- It is, without a doubt!

But if we don't discuss,

here in the
public defense department,

ways to reach a more just society,
then we're all lost.

For us to become a more just society

we must all be connected
to this society

and not be discussing
utopic theories.

Sorry, but utopic for me is to believe
that the criminal system

is going to change in an instant.

After 200 years of failure.

My God! 200 years!

It's like a marriage that has been
going badly for 200 years

and then you think that it will change
by going to a marriage counselor.

My God!

But anyway, if we can't
move forward with this discussion,

what you must grasp here...

You know what I like?

When they go like this:

"Thank you,

Thank you for speaking so sweetly.

Thank you for your patience...

Makes me want to punch someone.

Jesus Christ!
You have no idea how hard it is,

talking softly like this.

Once, I went to a lecture.

And the lecturer sat down,

crossed her legs...

And said:

You know what's missing?

I think it is missing some hate...

You know what it is missing?
For us to grab some guns.

To kill.

Because Urutu has come to steal,
kill and destroy.

Oh, gosh!
She is so incredible!

What are you doing?
You're so evil!

I will!

It's OK!

So beautiful, this red face!

1, 2, 3.

I'm going to count again...
1, 2, 3...

Now!

1, 2, 3...

Please...

I'm talking about every case,
including homicide ones.

But we can start talking specifically
about Domestic Violence Act.

I don't know if you are all updated,
but recently

the Supreme Court has modified
their understanding

and decreed that in
Domestic Violence's cases

any injury, no matter how slight,

should be transformed into an
unconditional liability lawsuit.

Yes, but in the case of the
Domestic Violence Act

the Supreme Court
ignored pre-existing laws.

Something they could not have done.

Unfortunately,
the Supreme Court has often

trespassed into the sphere
of our legislative body.

It only goes to show just
how badly we need someone

who really understands criminal law
in the Supreme Court.

What you're saying here

is that by supporting
the institution of femicide,

or the Domestic Violence Act
or the criminalization of racism,

that we would also be supporting
a police state?

What do you think?

That our duty is to defend
the population

against the violence of the State.

When organizing criminal law
around these types of violence,

of these aggressions to human rights,

we are defending
the population against violence.

Yes, these types
of violence are systemic.

But is increasing State oppression
the right way to resolve

these structural aggressions?

- I think the whole discussion is absurd.
- Why is that?

Because we are living
through dark times.

You can't simply abandon
all the rights we've conquered.

But, don't you think
that you're repressing the debate?

That debate must be suppressed.

Precisely, those people think that women,
gays, Blacks, should all be killed.

- Do you agree?
- Of course not.

You really question if
law is punitive or not?

Look, I just think that we have to
always debate criminal law.

If not, the laws
will all be crystallized.

I'm afraid of losing any law,
any right.

But when the state crosses a boundary, it
is very hard to get it to go back later.

Yeah, well who are the laws
protecting nowadays?

God, I love it when white folks
get stirred up about us blacks.

But still, Jana...

we can't stop pointing out
that criminal law is selective, right?

Look, you are oppressing
a man using a criminal system

which was built by
a patriarchal society.

- You are all being oppressors!
- Come again? Hold on.

They're not being oppressors,
the State is the oppressor.

Tell me, have you ever been afraid
to be at home alone?

Of being alone with a man
in an elevator?

Are you afraid
of walking down the street?

So, as long as women
suffer these threats,

don't talk to me
about how we're the oppressors.

There's this story that really
impressed me as a child.

A boy that lived next door.

He stole something

from a local grocery store.

His mother found out,
boiled a pot of water

and then stuck his hand in it.

Is that punishment?

What do you think?

Do you think it's atonement

to submit someone
to the same pain they caused, throw them

into the fire?

I'm not throwing anyone to the fire,
they did it to themselves.

But I'm talking about you.

Your role in all of this.

Because it is the duty of the
public defender to defend these guys.

And what do you suggest
as a solution?

- Put them in jail, punishment?
- It's not punishment!

Submit them to some kind of violence?

Because these men are victims too!

There are good people and bad people!

Very well.

Thinking along these lines,
that there are good and bad people.

For example, what if this boy
who had his hand burned

was a good person,
all you would have to do was talk to him

and he wouldn't steal anymore.

You wouldn't need to go
and stick his hand into the fire.

But then, if he was a bad person

would it make any difference to
burn Captain Hook's hand?

You two, pay attention to practice.

Kinda weak, huh?

Are you tired already?

I think it's time for someone
to get back to ballet class.

Oh, I'm sorry!

Lucia, what's going on?

Sorry, coach.

Everybody back to work.
Pay attention, no big deal.

I'm sorry.

Fuck.

I didn't mean to, sorry.

Girl,

let me help you here.

Let me see.

Fuck, Simone!

The relationship between
the functionalist theory

and that of criminal cultures

is not one of reciprocal exclusion

and can be better understood
as both being compatible.

And can be better understood...

In reality, the two theories
are developed on two different planes.

The first endeavors...

The first...

The hypothesis suggested here,
replacing conventional theories,

is that white collar
delinquency itself,

as any other form of
systemic delinquency, is learned.

My relationship with my father ended
when I buried my sister.

When he and my mother got a divorce

he went to live with another woman
and had a daughter.

Time passed...

and then one day we were at home,
me, my mother and two sisters.

And my aunt Catu called to tell us
that our sister had died.

We all looked at each other,

"but Catu we're all here,
what sister are you talking about?"

And she told us how our father
had had another daughter

that he hadn't told us about.

And ever since that day any possibility
of me getting back with my father

was buried along with my sister.

In other words,
I don't want to have kids.

A toast.

A toast to all the parents
that fucked up our lives.

Cheers.

We are late.

To the public defender course.

Shall we go?

- What's your name?
- Nil.

Nil, welcome and thank you
for coming. OK?

You feel at ease
to tell us your story.

He hit me the first time in my face

during our first month of marriage.

One month later I became pregnant

and his aggressions
kept getting worse.

I did my best to hide my body,
not use deep cut dresses,

but it started changing.

I started to get fat.

And as I got fatter he would
put me down more and more.

He'd humiliate me the whole day.

He'd say things like...

"you're fat, you're ugly,

you can't do anything right,

you'll never pass in school,

you'll never get anywhere
without me..."

What he said the most was
"you'll never make it without me".

And just when I was all ready
to leave him,

I got pregnant with my daughter Duda.

And then it all started over again,

I was thinking what I could do
to not break up with him.

Last week Duda
had her third birthday.

And then, the day after,

around midnight.

The worst night in my entire life.

I went through...

He did what he thought he could

he did whatever he wanted to me.

And then later I spent
nearly three hours

in the shower scrubbing myself,

because I was disgusted with myself.

I felt dirty, you know what I mean?

Calm, calm down

I think you are right.

I think I'd be better off
getting back to ballet.

You have to defend yourself.

Is this some kind of game for you?

You scared?

Yeah.

I think your ballerina hands

are only good for getting
daddy's coffee.

I think it's despicable the way
you try to manipulate me.

But it is obvious that the girls
were all at a disadvantage here.

And that the professed use
of the establishment is only a façade.

Saying that place is not used exclusively
for the promotion of sex is absurd!

As if anyone would pay 100 R$
for an hour in a sauna!

You seem to know the prices...

No sexist jokes, please!

The question is

"Is it up to the public defense system
to discuss ethics or morality?"

Can you imagine a prostitute
coming up to the judge and saying,

"It's true, your Honor,

the place is horrible and everything
they say really happens."

She'd be dead the next day!

This "being dead the next day"
is what I want to get to here.

How can we protect this woman
who wants to talk

- but knows she could pay with her life?
- Regulating the profession.

Regulating the market.

You talk as if it was something cool,

Like, "I want to be a whore".

- It's not like that at all.
- You don't know that.

They are where they are
because they are excluded,

oppressed, to guarantee the financial
conditions for a respectable job for her.

- Respectable?
- Yeah.

We need to be against prostitution
and in favor of the prostitute.

Would you say the same thing
about housekeeping work?

They have lousy paying
jobs, as well, are exploited.

But you wouldn't call for
doing away with their profession.

Could you explain how you can,
simultaneously,

be in favor of the prostitute
and against prostitution?

Because it seems to me
that by eradicating prostitution

means doing away
with the prostitutes.

Prostitution isn't a life project!

We can't treat prostitution
in such a binary manner.

And what about the women who have been
fighting for years for their profession,

who have been fighting
their whole lives for their rights?

Yeah, it is very paternalistic
of us to think

we can speak out
in their name and say:

"Nobody is here
because they want to be".

- Who would want to be in their place?
- Their clients love it!

JOYSTICK: WANNA PLAY WHAT?

Roulette!

FRUSTRATED GAMER: I LOVE THIS GAME!

It's roulette day.

DANGERANGEL22: TELL ME WHAT TO DO

GOAL: 1.000 TOKENS = ROULETTE!

GAYHACKER1010: LET'S CUM! KAYKY_94:
I FEEL LIKE LICKING YOU ALL OVER

JACKBEAN: TIPPED 100 TOKENS

JACKBEAN: NIPPLE CLIPPERS

KIDNERD: TIPPED 100 TOKENS

NERDKID: TITTY FUCK!

KINKY_CARIOCA: YOU GUYS ARE LAME!
THIS WOMAN CAN HANDLE MORE!

SCHLONG32: I MISSED
THE SWAY OF YOUR HIPS!

AMERICAN_LOVER: WANNA FUCK YOU HARD!

JACKBEAN: I WANNA SEE YOUR CUNT!

CAIOPUBES: TIPPED 100 TOKENS

CAIOPUBES: SWALLOW THAT DILDO

BULLCUCK: GOOD ONE!
I WANNA SEE YOU SWALLOW IT.

PLAY WITH FRUITS IN YOUR CUNT

DANDERANGEL22:
1-NIPPLE CLIPPERS /2-TITTY FUCK

3- SWALLOW DILDO /
4-PLAY WITH FRUITS

BLACKIEBA38: YOU SWALLOW IT ALL?
MY DICK IS QUITE THICK.

KIDNERD: DAMN, I'M ALMOST
CUMMING HERE!

Still need two more.

WANKERRJ: WHAT ABOUT MINE?
DILDOS UP ASS!

MRCOCK2020 HAS ENTERED

MRCOCK2020: YOU GONNA START
WITHOUT ME, PRINCESS?

MRCOCK2020: WANNA SEE IF YOU
CAN HANDLE IT.

Last call.

MRCOCK2020: TIPPED 100 TOKENS

MRCOCK2020: SELF-ASPHYXIATION

Self-asphyxiation alone is dangerous,
no way.

MRCOCK2020: I THOUGHT WE WERE
MAKING THE CALLS.

CAIOPUBES: JEEZ!

MRCOCK2020: WASN'T IT WE ORDER
AND YOU OBEY?

OK!

ROLLING DICE...

RESULT: SELF-ASPHYXIATION!

MRCOCK2020: IT'S SEEMS I'M LUCKY.
FUTURELESBIAN: JEEZ, GIRL

MRCOCK2020: TIPPED 100 TOKENS
JACKBEAN: DON'T DO IT. IT'S DANGEROUS

MRCOCK2020: LET'S DO IT!

You're going to drop out
of law school

to fulfill your dream
of becoming a porn star.

I hate to tell you but
the retirement benefits are lousy.

I'm going to be a double agent.

Public defender by day,

pornstar by night.

Like you:

taking pictures of kid's parties by day,
and orgies by night.

No orgies!

Artistic sex images.

- Artistic sex?
- Yeah, artistic sex.

Yesterday some guy wanted me
to do self-asphyxiation...

I can teach you!
I can show you techniqu...

You're in São Paulo Nat,
I want to do it now.

No!

First you have to learn
how to minimize risks.

Shit Nat, what are you talking about?

I think you got this BDSM thing
all wrong.

It's all about trust, about exchange.

You see this?

Nice huh?

Goes up and down by itself.

Super safe.

Well, if that super safe cupboard
decides to fall,

you know I'm here, right?

Thank you.

He won't even let me go out alone,

or talk to my family
because he hid my mobile.

I was going to sign up
for a culinary course

but he hid my ID for me
to miss the deadline.

He's not bad,

he's a good man,

a deacon at our church, a thither,

doesn't drink.

Have you ever tried talking
to a friend about this?

Yeah.

A couple.

They say: "does he beat you?"

And then when I tell them no,

because Andre has never raised
a finger against me,

they say he's just
overly zealous with me.

Not all violence is physical,
Dona Ivone.

I don't know if you are aware of it,

but many women try to get out
of this vicious cycle of violence,

want to go back to school,
get a job, like you did.

And the men think they can prevent
them from doing so,

And that is what your husband
is doing to you,

do you understand?

The law provides
for some forms of protection.

Would you like me
to explain them to you?

She doesn't want to file
a report against him.

Says she loves him,

that he's the father of her kids.

Why don't you talk to her husband?

Are you crazy?

I know this center for rehabilitation
of domestic abusers.

They have been very successful
in treating aggressive men.

Didn't you say that she has two kids
and no job,

that he's the only provider at home?

How'll she support herself?

This guy is using his power over
their financial situation against her

and you think it's alright?

I'm saying I understand her.

Oh, you Lucia, understand
what this woman's going through?

I'm just saying
that financial problems exist

and you have to understand
how they affect the family.

The guy doesn't even know that
what he is doing is violence,

Nobody explained it to him.

And you think you're going to be able to
undo an ingrained part of society

by talking to the guy?

You don't have a clue how money
affects this family, do you?

We all know that
the penal system is selective,

It incarcerates certain people
and not others.

Now, for Raúl Zaffaroni
what people don't say is that

this selectivity of the penal system
is not an error of the system itself.

It isn't that the system is unjust

and we all have to strive
for an egalitarian one.

For him this is something
that will never happen.

Because the selectivity of the system
is feature not a bug.

So what's new in the theory?

According to Zaffaroni when a judge
is about to sentence a defendant

he should think:

Look, I know that this person is here
because the system is selective,

so I'll have to revert things a bit,
compensate for its selectivity.

I need to treat unequally those
who suffer from inequality.

Have any of you ever seen a verdict
given with this in mind?

In "Operation Car Wash".

They used Zaffaroni's theory
against the businessmen

using the vulnerability theory
in reverse.

In other words, you who have been
well-educated must pay a higher price.

Unhappily an example that illustrates
what I have been saying:

all the theories created
to limit State violence,

to decrease injustice, are then
used to actually increase it.

As if they wanted to expand
selective penal injustice

and not level it out.

Yeah, but the problem
is that justice,

like Zaffaroni himself says,
cannot be homogenized...

Yes,

but what is the best strategy
to deal with this problem?

Disseminate injustice?

Aren't we focusing
on the wrong issue?

To not criminalize or to decriminalize
any specific conduct

is a far cry from approving it.

They always put the onions in.

What are you doing here?

I'm sorry.

You were right.

You're a great professional

- and I think that...
- If I hear another compliment from you.

I'll think you're not
on your right mind.

Circumcised.

- Is it?
- How can you tell?

Look at his bell end.

- Where?
- Where?

Hold it, ask him to move his hand.

Do you speak English?

We want to see your bell end.

It's all gooey.

- Is it?
- Of course man.

Let's tell him he rocks!

AUGUSTO: SHE'S GONNA CUM
FOR THE 5TH TIME!

MRCOCK2020: TIPPED 500 TOKENS

MRCOCK2020: FOR YOU, MY LOVE

REPENTANTLOVER14:
ISN'T THAT DANGEROUS?

PINKBELLEND: SHE'S PROBABLY
IN THE CLOUDS

YOUR ACCOUNT HAS BEEN SHUT DOWN DUE
TO THE VIOLATION OF COMMUNITY STANDARDS

Hi, how are you all? Paulo.

- Simone.
- Nice meeting you.

Welcome Paulo.

Thanks a lot for coming.

- My pleasure.
- Nice meeting you.

- I had great references from your work.
- That's nice.

A crime?

She's crazy!

Ever since she started going
to that school she's gone crazy.

You can ask in my street,
everyone'll tell you I'm a good guy.

I'm not going to ask anyone
because I'm not a police officer,

that isn't what we do here.

But if I were to investigate anything

I'd check out what goes
on inside your house.

Because on the street you're a nice guy,
but what about inside four walls?

I've never hit her.
I've never hit you.

André, being a man in society
isn't an easy job.

We think that just because we're men
we have to be the big-shot,

the guy responsible for everything,
the provider.

A man who dominates.

And then, when the women
want to open up their horizon,

it is normal for men
to feel insecure.

You yourself said,

"after she began going
to school she changed".

Of course she has!

Because education transforms people.

But you preventing her from going
to school is a crime man.

But, you know what I think?

I think that violence
it's something you learn.

And if you can learn,
what else can I learn?

Non-violence!
And we can teach you that man.

Look, Dona Ivone didn't want
to file a report against you,

but you can go down
to the center yourself if you want.

My first relationship

was with Jorge.

A guy from Rio Grande do Sul,

white,

privileged, rich.

And we went to live together,
like we were married.

But then, when my social life

came into contact with his.

I thought, "holy shit".

And his parents didn't know
that he was queer

nor that he was living
with a black guy.

And so, when he decided to tell them
that we were a couple,

the first thing his mother asked was,

"do you support him?"

Jorge was pretty important
in my life.

So first now you are able to look
critical on your relationship with him?

Simone, didn't anybody
ever teach you how to cook?

No way man...

May I?

- Keep going?
- Yes.

For real!

More.

Do it stronger!

Like this?

Even Chaturbate kicked you out, huh?

Very amateurish.

So you're going to do the honor
of helping me out this time?

CNC is not safe for beginners.

For a BDSM perv you're a bit
chickenhearted, huh?

You gave up on your desire,
is that it?

Simone, I'm not kidding.

Consensuality has to do
with information,

if you don't have the information
you can't consent to something.

You're being
overly paternalistic, Nat.

Man, I've seen submissive partners be
destroyed, with me pick up the pieces.

You can't guarantee that there is
no violation of BDSM consensuality.

"Nobody wants a Broken Toy."

Shit, Simone.

You can't look at BDSM
as if it were separated from society,

there are insane people out there.

All I'm only asking is for you
to keep up your guard.

And do you know
any sexy guard I can hire?

Jerk.

When the priest found out
that they had come here

he kicked them out of the church.

Andre had been sober for years.

And now Dona Ivone is in the hospital.
Still breathing, happily.

Sometimes...

I think that what we do here...

is no use at all.

All for nothing.

It's not your fault.

It's not.

He had never beaten her.

She'd be at home with her kids.

Shit man.

Missed you.

Serve the guest.

- Her glass is full man.
- Thank you.

Those are the rules...

Every un-circ...

un-circumcised dick,
or is it circumcised?

- I've forgotten.
- Un-circumcised, means we drink.

- Un-circumcised?
- Yes.

Those are less rare.

Rare? No way.

I'm gonna start.

A circumcised dick is a rare find.

Un-circumcised means we drink.

So, we drink too much!

Less rare.

Hold it, let's review it.

Where's the VR?

No, it's useless.

Circumcised tits?

Gosh, I kiss you!

- It's him guys!
- It's that guy.

We brought... he doesn't hear us...
we invited a friend.

He's fantastic,

this guy, we got him lots of times.

And you recognize him
because of his dick?

WHERE ARE YOU? MISS YOU

I'VE APPEALED, THEY'RE GOING
TO RESTORE MY ACCOUNT.

WASN'T THAT TOO PRUDE?

WHAT'S UP?

I REALLY LIKE
YOUR LAST TRANSMISSION.

I like more your violent side.

What'd you like best
about the last one?

Your trembling body,

teary eyes.

Want more?

I'd do anything to see
you suffocating again.

5.000 tokens

for an exclusive.

OK, count me in.

But I want to see you suffer.

Slaps in the face, flushing, cumming.

I want it all.

I'm not going to follow any
stupid jerk-off video rules.

OK, but I want to see
you suffer, a lot.

Just give me a call
if you need me, OK?

- OK.
- Take care.

For sure.

- Have a nice trip.
- Thanks.

MR COCK2020: I DIDN'T KNOW
THERE WOULD BE ONE MORE IN THE GAME

MR COCK2020: I HOPE HE MAKES
YOU SUFFER.

Woww!

Fuck you!

MR COCK2020: HIT HER AGAIN

MR COCK2020: SHE LIKES IT

Is that all you got?

Screw you.

Give it to me.

Com'on!

Give it to me.

Give me.

Let it go!

We don't have to do this anymore, OK?

I know.

I don't know,

the next time we can use some kind
of safe word, just in case.

It's OK.

I'm OK!

Simone,

someone here to see you.

You shouldn't be here.

No way.

I bent his arm to tell me
what happened.

How are you?

I'm fine.

- Yeah right, just fine?
- Yeah, I am.

Simone, have you looked
your body in the mirror?

Don't get me wrong,
but I'm an full-grown women.

If I'll fuck myself up, or to get
fucked up, that's my business.

I see.

And if this starts affecting your work,
that's your business too?

This has nothing to do with my work.

I like it. It excites me.

You know what that is?

- Lust?
- So tell me,

where does all this lust come from?

Who do you think controls
the website you upload to?

A bunch of empowered women?

And who gets fucked up
by seeing you get fucked?

Who's problem is that?

What if I'm doing everything
the sex industry taught me? So what?

What do you think I should do?

Repress myself?

Listen, I'm real sorry if my sexual
desires aren't political enough for you.

For my part this conversation is over.
You can leave now!

Go on,

Get out!

Cristina Viana was viciously beaten
by her own husband,

the defendant Antonio Pereira.

There is reasonable evidence

to believe that the defendant
had the intention of killing her.

There were...

There were two cuts to the head
and a triple fracture in one of her arms

caused by the blunt force of a crowbar.

A hideous crime.

Another crime born from within
this patriarchal society

in which we live.

Brazil has the fifth highest
femicide rate worldwide.

Every two hours a woman is murdered.

Cases such as Cristina Viana's

however must be taken in context.

Antonio Pereira is the son of Ismael
Pereira and Maria dos Santos.

Ismael, poor, alcoholic,

beat Maria on a regular basis.

As well as often beating his own son,
the defendant, Antonio.

This history of abuse
doesn't justify the crime

but helps us put the act
into the correct context to better

understand the vicious circle of
violence in which this man is inserted.

Therefore, your honor,
there was a crime, for sure.

But we must be careful when stipulating
his culpability.

Antonio Pereira is an offspring

of the patriarchal system
in which we live.

We must consider culpability due to
vulnerability in this case.

I ask you, your honor:

Are we correct in strictly demanding

normal behavior of all
the Antonio's existing in Brazil?

Shouldn't that demand be minimized by
giving him a smaller custodial sentence?

Your Honor, she can't do that!

Why?

There must be an aggravating factor in
the offense because of gender identity.

No matter what you decide
to do with criminals

offenders against black, indigenous,
LGTBS communities,

There has to be an
aggravating factor.

It is not a common crime.

No, it is not a common crime.

It is a crime arising from
within this male chauvinistic society.

It is therefore up to us
public defenders

to understand our role
in transforming Brazilian society

by acting against the gargantuan
increase of the punitive State.

Today we should celebrate an
important stage in this process.

But remember that your real training
only ends in three years,

at the end of the probationary stage.

Congratulations and good work!

Hold it Lucia, just a minute.

Congratulations!

Hello.

Hi, Simone,

Hey, I believe we need to talk.

Sorry, it's just that I worry
about you.

I know.

I'm here.

Let's drink?

Bye.

I love you.

You're drunk, call me tomorrow.

- Take care of her.
- I will.

Let's go?

Do me a favor?

Sleep over at Lucia's place tonight.

OK.

Hey, Lucia.

I'm going to sleep at your place, OK?

Take care.

Whoop it up!

20.000 TOKENS FOR YOU TO COME TO MY
PLACE AND DO WHATEVER YOU WANT.

THE ONLY RULE...

THE ONLY RULE IS THAT
THERE ARE NO RULES!

THE PAYMENT

MR COCK: ADDRESS?

MR COCK: ???????

782 DOUTOR JULIO OTONI ST.